Re: [leaf-devel] Site Update (2004-02-02)

2004-02-02 Thread Martin Hejl
Hi Mike, Nice work - that should make the links for pointing people to the right package a lot shorter (and hopefully solve the problems with slow CVS servers). Our project is a small percentage of the overall load placed on the SF cvs pserver. lol - I know. I didn't mean solve the problem for S

Re: [leaf-devel] Site Update (2004-02-02)

2004-02-02 Thread Mike Noyes
On Mon, 2004-02-02 at 12:33, Martin Hejl wrote: > Nice work - that should make the links for pointing people to the right > package a lot shorter (and hopefully solve the problems with slow CVS > servers). Martin, Thanks. :-) Our project is a small percentage of the overall load placed on the SF

Re: [leaf-devel] Site Update (2004-02-02)

2004-02-02 Thread Martin Hejl
Hi Mike, Mike Noyes wrote: Everyone, Our binary packages directory[1] in cvs is now exporting daily to our shell space on SF. I haven't completed population of glibc-2.0[2] or nolibc yet. Also, I haven't worked out how I want to auto index our package repository. Anyway, you can now link to any of

[leaf-devel] Site Update (2004-02-02)

2004-02-02 Thread Mike Noyes
Everyone, Our binary packages directory[1] in cvs is now exporting daily to our shell space on SF. I haven't completed population of glibc-2.0[2] or nolibc yet. Also, I haven't worked out how I want to auto index our package repository. Anyway, you can now link to any of our current packages from: