On Mon, 2004-11-29 at 12:41, Tom Eastep wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-11-29 at 12:32 -0800, Mike Noyes wrote:
> > Either way, your SR should
> > be attended to by one of the SF staff members shortly.
>
> No particular hurry -- I've turned off SPF screening in my MTA until the
> problem is resolved.
Tom,
On Mon, 2004-11-29 at 12:32 -0800, Mike Noyes wrote:
> Either way, your SR should
> be attended to by one of the SF staff members shortly.
No particular hurry -- I've turned off SPF screening in my MTA until the
problem is resolved.
-Tom
--
Tom Eastep\ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently
On Mon, 2004-11-29 at 12:32 -0800, Mike Noyes wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-11-29 at 11:33, Tom Eastep wrote:
> > At http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php, I see SPF mentioned 6 times
> > (including my own report).
>
> Tom,
> Thanks for the aid. I'll monitor it.
>
> https://sourceforge.net/sup
On Mon, 2004-11-29 at 11:33, Tom Eastep wrote:
> At http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php, I see SPF mentioned 6 times
> (including my own report).
Tom,
Thanks for the aid. I'll monitor it.
https://sourceforge.net/support/tracker.php?aid=1075459
I suspect SPF still isn't implemented a
On Mon, 2004-11-29 at 11:31 -0800, Mike Noyes wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-11-29 at 11:10, Tom Eastep wrote:
> > In case you are unaware, the current SPF configuration of
> > lists.sourceforge.net is hosed. As a result, SPF-aware MTAs are
> > rejecting all list traffic. There are many open trouble reports
On Mon, 2004-11-29 at 11:10, Tom Eastep wrote:
> In case you are unaware, the current SPF configuration of
> lists.sourceforge.net is hosed. As a result, SPF-aware MTAs are
> rejecting all list traffic. There are many open trouble reports on this
> issue (including the one I just opened after I inv
