Hi Folks
What is the significance ot the cdiff files in the kernel directory and
what is the canonical way now to make changes to the config files? This
all appears way non standard.
chees
ET
--
Go from Idea to Many App
Am 17.04.2015 um 12:12 schrieb Andrew:
> Hi.
> It sounds good - it'll simplify maintenance.
> But IMHO we should leave kernel major/minor versions - just because we
> may have different kernel versions for different platforms in future
> (for ex., some SoC may require specified kernel version for
Hi.
It sounds good - it'll simplify maintenance.
But IMHO we should leave kernel major/minor versions - just because we
may have different kernel versions for different platforms in future
(for ex., some SoC may require specified kernel version for Soc-related
patches).
17.04.2015 08:58, Erich
Hi Folks
I have been thinking some more on the way we handle our kernel config
files and looked at the rather complicated way we handle them in
buildtool.mk.
We keep the version number of the kernel in the config files. This
completely defeats the purpose of a version control system, as this is
o
Hi KP
Am 16.04.2015 um 19:23 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
> Hi Erich;
>
...
>
> I suggest you commit your changes to branch next (I think we need to merge
> master into next before?) or a a topic branch. Either way we can test your
> work before make it into master.
And even then we need a bit o
Am 16.04.2015 um 14:00 schrieb Andrew:
> 16.04.2015 14:48, Erich Titl пишет:
>> Am 16.04.2015 um 13:06 schrieb Andrew:
>>> Hi.
>>> 16.04.2015 11:02, Erich Titl пишет
>> ...
>>> AFAIR we decided to store config files just for cases when patch doesn't
>>> lays on new kernel config, for easier trouble
Hi Erich;
Am Donnerstag, 16. April 2015, 10:02:58 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi KP
>
> I had a quick look in the kernel config files and came up with a few
> questions you may be able to answer. All my findings are based on the
> latest git master version.
>
> Bering-3.14.20.config-versatile Beri
16.04.2015 14:48, Erich Titl пишет:
> Am 16.04.2015 um 13:06 schrieb Andrew:
>> Hi.
>> 16.04.2015 11:02, Erich Titl пишет
> ...
>> AFAIR we decided to store config files just for cases when patch doesn't
>> lays on new kernel config, for easier troubleshootong.
> So if you don't trust patch, why pa
Am 16.04.2015 um 13:06 schrieb Andrew:
> Hi.
> 16.04.2015 11:02, Erich Titl пишет
...
> AFAIR we decided to store config files just for cases when patch doesn't
> lays on new kernel config, for easier troubleshootong.
So if you don't trust patch, why patch?
>> So I would like to see the Berning-
Hi.
16.04.2015 11:02, Erich Titl пишет:
> Hi KP
>
> I had a quick look in the kernel config files and came up with a few
> questions you may be able to answer. All my findings are based on the
> latest git master version.
>
> Bering-3.14.20.config-versatile Bering-3.14.36.config-i486.patch
> Be
Hi KP
I had a quick look in the kernel config files and came up with a few
questions you may be able to answer. All my findings are based on the
latest git master version.
Bering-3.14.20.config-versatile Bering-3.14.36.config-i486.patch
Bering-3.14.36.config Bering-3.14.36.confi
Am 18.12.2011 14:10, schrieb david M brooke:
>
> On 17 Dec 2011, at 18:56, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
>>
>> Does any of the telephony applications (yate, asterisk) do need ISDN
>> support?
> Asterisk does not need ISDN and I don't think yate does either (though I
> haven't checked).
>
>> Otherwise
On 17 Dec 2011, at 18:56, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
>
> Does any of the telephony applications (yate, asterisk) do need ISDN
> support?
Asterisk does not need ISDN and I don't think yate does either (though I
haven't checked).
> Otherwise it may removed from the kernel.
>
> kp
I think it is OK t
Am 17.12.2011 20:39, schrieb KP Kirchdoerfer:
> Hi;
>
> results of current status of the kernel review in size (for changes pls
> have a look at
> https://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/leaf/index.php?title=Bering-uClibc_4.x_-_Changelog#Changes_between_4.1.1_and_4.2-beta1)
>
> kernel size
> linux
Hi;
results of current status of the kernel review in size (for changes pls
have a look at
https://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/leaf/index.php?title=Bering-uClibc_4.x_-_Changelog#Changes_between_4.1.1_and_4.2-beta1)
kernel size
linux-2.6.35.14-geode 1,2MB -> 937kb
linux-2.6.35.14-i486 1,3MB ->
Am 11.12.2011 17:06, schrieb Andrew:
> Hi all.
> I made some changes into kernel config today (I replaced cache allocator
> from slab to slob on non-SMP embedded targets - slob seems to have less
> resource consumption due to it's simplicity, and is targeted for small
> systems); also I enabled
Hi all.
I made some changes into kernel config today (I replaced cache allocator
from slab to slob on non-SMP embedded targets - slob seems to have less
resource consumption due to it's simplicity, and is targeted for small
systems); also I enabled heap randomization (it's recommended value),
a
17 matches
Mail list logo
