RE: [Leaf-devel] My 'compile for LEAF' experience...

2001-11-29 Thread Luis.F.Correia
>Luis F. Correia wrote: >> Dunno, I got them from the RedHat CD. >> >> One thing to take in account is the name may be different, but the >> words 'compat' and '5.2' must be present. >> >> On RedHat 7.1 and 7.2 there are other 'compat' libraries in which the >> names change to '6.2' >That's

Re: [Leaf-devel] My 'compile for LEAF' experience...

2001-11-29 Thread David Douthitt
Luis F. Correia wrote: > Dunno, I got them from the RedHat CD. > > One thing to take in account is the name may be different, but the words > 'compat' and '5.2' must be present. > > On RedHat 7.1 and 7.2 there are other 'compat' libraries in which the names > change to '6.2' That's because 5.2

RE: [Leaf-devel] My 'compile for LEAF' experience...

2001-11-29 Thread Luis.F.Correia
>On 11/29/01 at 9:38 AM, Luis.F.Correia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >wrote: >> After a sucessfull install, I booted and installed the extra >> 'compat' rpms. As a note, one should use the RPM's stated in >> http://www.redhat.com/knowledgebase/glibccompat/building.html >Are they the same as the ones on t

Re: [Leaf-devel] My 'compile for LEAF' experience...

2001-11-29 Thread David Douthitt
On 11/29/01 at 9:38 AM, Luis.F.Correia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > After a sucessfull install, I booted and installed the extra > 'compat' rpms. As a note, one should use the RPM's stated in > http://www.redhat.com/knowledgebase/glibccompat/building.html Are they the same as the ones on the LR