Re: [Leaf-devel] Converting Documentation to DocBook - progressreport

2002-08-28 Thread Mike Noyes
On Tue, 2002-08-27 at 22:21, Greg Morgan wrote: > David Douthitt and Mike Noyes wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 05:54:58AM -0700, Mike Noyes wrote: > > > On Thu, 2002-08-22 at 20:14, David Douthitt wrote: > > > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 04:44:47AM -0700, Mike Noyes wrote: > > > > > FreeBSD shou

Re: [Leaf-devel] Converting Documentation to DocBook - progressreport

2002-08-22 Thread Mike Noyes
On Wed, 2002-08-21 at 20:39, David Douthitt wrote: > On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 11:28:28AM -0700, Mike Noyes wrote: > > > Recent versions of Abiword will read RTF and export to DocBook XML. > > Excellent! I've Abiword in several places (both FreeBSD and Linux I think). David, FreeBSD should have

Re: [Leaf-devel] Converting Documentation to DocBook - progressreport

2002-08-21 Thread Mike Noyes
On Wed, 2002-08-21 at 08:23, David Douthitt wrote: > Then there's a RTF-to-DocBook converter - but it isn't free. David, Recent versions of Abiword will read RTF and export to DocBook XML. Gnome Office http://www.gnome.org/gnome-office/abiword.shtml > It sounds like the usual way is to edit Doc

Re: [Leaf-devel] Converting Documentation to DocBook - progressreport

2002-08-21 Thread Mike Noyes
okPackages Here is a link containing a list of XML editors. http://www.xmlsoftware.com/editors.html XML parsers http://www.xmlsoftware.com/parsers.html XSLT processors http://www.xmlsoftware.com/xslt.html Please review my earlier post for DTD, XSL style sheet, and authoring template recommendations.

Re: [Leaf-devel] Converting Documentation to DocBook - progressreport

2002-08-21 Thread Mike Noyes
On Wed, 2002-08-21 at 08:23, David Douthitt wrote: > On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 03:27:30PM +0100, Julian Church wrote: > > >I see that DocBook (v3.1) exists for Red Hat 6.2; will this > > >be sufficient? Do I have to upgrade? Will new versions work > > >on Red Hat 6.2? > > > > I'm sure they will -

Re: [Leaf-devel] Converting Documentation to DocBook - progressreport

2002-08-21 Thread Mike Noyes
On Wed, 2002-08-21 at 07:27, Julian Church wrote: > Hi David > > At 08:48 21/08/02 -0500, David Douthitt wrote: > >I've decided I need to revisit the LEAF Developer's Guide, > >and want to know what I need to do to make it ready for > >this "DocBook" format. > > I've been working on converting y

Re: [Leaf-devel] Converting Documentation to DocBook - progressreport

2002-08-21 Thread Mike Noyes
On Wed, 2002-08-21 at 06:48, David Douthitt wrote: > I've decided I need to revisit the LEAF Developer's Guide, > and want to know what I need to do to make it ready for > this "DocBook" format. David, Julian has almost completed the conversion to DocBook XML for you. [Leaf-devel] Converting Doc

Re: [Leaf-devel] Converting Documentation to DocBook - progressreport

2002-08-16 Thread Mike Noyes
On Fri, 2002-08-16 at 01:25, Julian Church wrote: > At 07:47 15/08/02 -0700, Mike Noyes wrote: > >LDP Author Guide > >http://tldp.org/LDP/LDP-Author-Guide/index.html > > Many thanks for that - it's got a lot of info, and links to loads more. I > was aware of the Linux Documentation Project, but

Re: [Leaf-devel] Converting Documentation to DocBook - progressreport

2002-08-16 Thread Mike Noyes
On Fri, 2002-08-16 at 06:46, Mike Noyes wrote: > daily.sh crontab shell script (feedback on this script is appreciated) > http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/leaf/devel/mhnoyes/sf-admin/ Everyone, I just added a crontab entry for daily.sh. It will run daily at 1:15 AM PST/PDT. -- Mik

Re: [Leaf-devel] Converting Documentation to DocBook - progressreport

2002-08-16 Thread Mike Noyes
On Fri, 2002-08-16 at 02:11, Julian Church wrote: > At 23:55 15/08/02 -0700, Greg Morgan wrote: > >Perhaps then the question is how can documents be checked in via cvs, > >then deployed on the leaf site? I don't know all that you can do with > >SF, but is this possible? > > Does anyone know what

Re: [Leaf-devel] Converting Documentation to DocBook - progressreport

2002-08-15 Thread Mike Noyes
On Fri, 2002-07-12 at 08:10, Julian Church wrote: > I've a few questions. Julian, I apologize for the severe lag in responding to your post. > 1. What should I do about version numbering? I've been careful not to > change the text in any substantial way so going all the way from 1.2 to 1.3 >