Re: [Leaf-devel] More on dates

2002-02-09 Thread Matt Schalit
David Douthitt wrote: > > On 2/9/02 at 6:18 AM, Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > I use UTC/GMT for my router, because I think it's harder > > to track abuse across disparate systems that use local TZ. > > Is this reasoning sound? If you are going to be sharing your log with respect

Re: [Leaf-devel] More on dates

2002-02-09 Thread Matt Schalit
David Douthitt wrote: > > On 2/9/02 at 2:14 AM, Michael D. Schleif <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > However, since we are limited to shell scripting and my > > recent work on leaf has required me to compare dates and > > times, a working-as-advertised -d operation would simplify > > alot for me

Re: [Leaf-devel] More on dates

2002-02-09 Thread David Douthitt
On 2/9/02 at 2:14 AM, Michael D. Schleif <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > However, since we are limited to shell scripting and my > recent work on leaf has required me to compare dates and > times, a working-as-advertised -d operation would simplify > alot for me . . . > > What do you think? The da

Re: [Leaf-devel] More on dates

2002-02-09 Thread David Douthitt
On 2/9/02 at 6:18 AM, Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I use UTC/GMT for my router, because I think it's harder > to track abuse across disparate systems that use local TZ. > Is this reasoning sound? Not sure. The usual reason given for using GMT (on the hardware, anyway) is so that the

Re: [Leaf-devel] More on dates

2002-02-09 Thread Mike Noyes
David Douthitt, 2002-02-09 01:41 -0600 >On 2/8/02 at 5:23 AM, Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >wrote: > > I use rdate on my current floppy to set the time on boot. > > rdate connects a server on my lan, and my server connects > > to a timeserver on the Internet with xntpd. I use this > > setup for

Re: [Leaf-devel] More on dates

2002-02-08 Thread Michael D. Schleif
David Douthitt wrote: > > On 2/8/02 at 5:23 AM, Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > At 2002-02-08 00:43 -0600, David Douthitt wrote: > > > > >So how important is setting the time/date with date? Is rdate > > >(or ntpclient) enough? > > > I think it's important to have the correc

Re: [Leaf-devel] More on dates

2002-02-08 Thread David Douthitt
On 2/8/02 at 5:23 AM, Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 2002-02-08 00:43 -0600, David Douthitt wrote: > > >So how important is setting the time/date with date? Is rdate > >(or ntpclient) enough? > I think it's important to have the correct date. My ISP > NOC wont accept abuse repo

RE: [Leaf-devel] More on dates

2002-02-08 Thread Richard Doyle
> I figured out some of the confusion I was seeing: > 6) There is a NTP client - ntpclient appropriately - which > could replace rdate, if it is small enough... On my system, ntpclient is 12320 bytes compiled under uClibc (0.9.9+), 6474 bytes zipped at maximum compression. > David Douthitt >

Re: [Leaf-devel] More on dates

2002-02-08 Thread Mike Noyes
At 2002-02-08 00:43 -0600, David Douthitt wrote: >So how important is setting the time/date with date? Is rdate >(or ntpclient) enough? David, I think it's important to have the correct date. My ISP NOC wont accept abuse reports without valid time stamps in syslog. I use rdate on my curre