On Fri, 2002-08-30 at 21:40, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
>
> I'm well aware of mini_httpd, but it's 40K...sh-httpd is about 9K
> (including the conf file), and it's text so it compresses well in *.lrp
> packages!
>
Agreed!
> There's also micro_httpd, but it won't do CGI...
>
> You can "wrap"
> On Thu, 2002-08-29 at 21:59, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> > > > using sh-httpd. or a
> > > > small server (boa, thttpd)
>
> It looks as if almost noone knows about mini_httpd
> (http://www.acme.com/). It's from the same authors as thttpd. It's a
> little slower than thttpd, but smaller (40k vs.
On Friday 30 August 2002 14:04, Ewald Wasscher wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-08-29 at 21:59, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> > > > using sh-httpd. or a
> > > > small server (boa, thttpd)
>
> It looks as if almost noone knows about mini_httpd
> (http://www.acme.com/). It's from the same authors as thttpd. It
On Thu, 2002-08-29 at 21:59, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> > > using sh-httpd. or a
> > > small server (boa, thttpd)
It looks as if almost noone knows about mini_httpd
(http://www.acme.com/). It's from the same authors as thttpd. It's a
little slower than thttpd, but smaller (40k vs. 71k) and it
>I also agree perl would be an overkill. What we need is to create a
>framework like we have for lrps for web based management. Every lrp must
>have a web based config template that will be used by a master web script.
>The template format and scripting needs to be developed and standardised.
Wh
Hi Eric, Lynn, Charles
Asking for permission to come aboard.
regards
Erich
THINK
Püntenstrasse 39
8143 Stallikon
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Fingerprint: BC9A 25BC 3954 3BC8 C024 8D8A B7D4 FF9D 05B8 0A16
---
This sf.net email is sponsore
Hello Charles, Lynn , list
> > > Alternatively, use the same fields and write the
> > > engine in shell.script or php using sh-httpd. or a
> > > small server (boa, thttpd)
> >
> > It can be done with sh-httpd. Mosquito has used thttpd,
> > but thttpd is considerably larger (and more versitile).
>
