Mike Noyes, 2001-04-19 13:39 -0700
>Scott C. Best, 2001-04-19 11:43 -0700
>>Mike:
>> I'm not so worried about how far "down" they certify
>>as much as how far "up". Certainly, everything downstairs will
>>be LGPL (so mods cannot be taken private, but it can be combined
>>with closed-source
Scott C. Best, 2001-04-19 11:43 -0700
>Mike:
> I'm not so worried about how far "down" they certify
>as much as how far "up". Certainly, everything downstairs will
>be LGPL (so mods cannot be taken private, but it can be combined
>with closed-source apps),
Scott,
I don't think so. Read th
Mike:
I'm not so worried about how far "down" they certify
as much as how far "up". Certainly, everything downstairs will
be LGPL (so mods cannot be taken private, but it can be combined
with closed-source apps), and so I'm hoping for something as
straightforward as: 2.2.19 kernel, uLibC,
Scott C. Best, 2001-04-18 19:58 -0700
>Mike:
>
> I agree: a potentially watershed article. Quoting
>from a juicy bit:
>
> Cool. This will make my echowall porting efforts
>go that much smoother. ;)
Scott,
I like the idea, but not who proposed it. Inder Singh's opinions concern
me
Mike:
I agree: a potentially watershed article. Quoting
from a juicy bit:
"Our objective is to encourage the adoption of a single
unified embedded Linux 'platform' for embedded middleware
and application software, so that software developers can
rely upon the APIs being available in a
Mike Noyes, 2001-04-18 08:52 -0700
>Everyone,
>I belive this ELC announcement is significant. Opinions?
>
>Unified Embedded Platform Specification Established and
>Promoted by Embedded Linux Consortium Board
>http://www.embedded-linux.org/pressroom.php3#66
For those that are interested, a dissent
that sounds like a good thing.
--
Jack Coates
Monkeynoodle: It's what's for dinner!
On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Mike Noyes wrote:
> Everyone,
> I belive this ELC announcement is significant. Opinions?
>
> Unified Embedded Platform Specification Established and
> Promoted by Embedded Linux Consortium
