Hello;
Am Montag, 13. Januar 2014, 22:07:22 schrieb Andrew:
> Hi.
> I think that we should rename ARM_EDITOR var to some more generic name,
> because we should be targetted not only for ARM arch (for ex., MIPS).
> Maybe, PLATFORM_EDITOR?
Fine with me.
> Also, do we really need nano? Maybe it'll
Hi.
I think that we should rename ARM_EDITOR var to some more generic name,
because we should be targetted not only for ARM arch (for ex., MIPS).
Maybe, PLATFORM_EDITOR?
Also, do we really need nano? Maybe it'll be better to use busybox's vi
(it has just some kb size)?
Also, we have a lot of sm
Hi;
Rebased git branch master and now build the toochains (which will take hours
including testing, but I'm now in the mid of x86 and so far it looks good)
I've had a patch for etc on non-arm platforms as well waiting to be pushed,
but I've learned that ifdef/else/endif are possible in our bu
07.01.2014 19:28, KP Kirchdörfer пишет:
> Hi Andrew;
>
> Am Montag, 6. Januar 2014, 19:44:35 schrieb Andrew:
>> Hi all.
>>
>> At least I've got an idea how to easily maintain different targets with
>> different kernels, and how to simplify config/patches/etc storing with
>> minimum modifications of
Hi Andrew;
Am Montag, 6. Januar 2014, 19:44:35 schrieb Andrew:
> Hi all.
>
> At least I've got an idea how to easily maintain different targets with
> different kernels, and how to simplify config/patches/etc storing with
> minimum modifications of logic.
Nice coincidence - I've worked towards a
