[Leaf-devel] Small routers

2001-01-02 Thread Mike Sensney
I just saw a reference to this and thought it might be interesting enough to pass along. They are based on PC/104 architecture. They have a serial port, a 10baseT port, and between 1 and 4 PC Card slots for wireless radios. http://www.mite.cz/wireless-en/wireless-en.html

[Leaf-devel] Packaging & Butterfly

2001-01-02 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
Recently Dave Cinege contacted me about doing some work with him on the new packaging format for Butterfly. Since I've been banging my head against the existing LRP packaging scheme already, I told him I'd probably be willing to help. To get things going, Dave called me, and I wound up chatting

Re: [Leaf-devel] Firewall Design

2001-01-02 Thread David Douthitt
On 30 Dec 2000, at 20:06, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: > The use of shell-functions for building the rules for a DMZ would be > quite handy here, as you could have a generic 'add this function to > the DMZ rules', and a 'wrapper' shell function would call the > appropriate lower-level functions ba

[Leaf-devel] Site Update

2001-01-02 Thread Mike Noyes
Everyone, I hope you all had a pleasant holiday season. SourceForge ssh and scp seem to work now. :) I backed up the DocManager this morning, and updated our temporary home page. SourceForge has done something to Apache. Some of our links are broken e.g. leaf.sourceforge.net/pub . It looks lik

[Leaf-devel] Vote on web & logo entries

2001-01-02 Thread Mike Noyes
Everyone, I believe it's time to vote on the web and logo entries. I'd like to complete the vote by Monday. All developers have a vote, and non developers can express their opinions. I'll tally the votes, and post a running total daily. If the vote is close there will be a run-off. If there is

Re: [Leaf-devel] Packaging & Butterfly

2001-01-02 Thread Jack Coates
this sounds interesting. Is the new system going to be 2.4 based? I ask because 2.4 is supposed to have stateful inspection, which makes firewall a much more applicable term. I'd be interested in helping out on a firewall script system, but I don't have a great deal of time. Have you checked out

Re: [Leaf-devel] Vote on web & logo entries

2001-01-02 Thread George Metz
On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Mike Noyes wrote: > Everyone, > I believe it's time to vote on the web and logo entries. I'd like to > complete the vote by Monday. All developers have a vote, and non developers > can express their opinions. I'll tally the votes, and post a running total > daily. If the vo

Re: [Leaf-devel] Packaging & Butterfly

2001-01-02 Thread Eric Wolzak
Hello > this sounds interesting. Is the new system going to be 2.4 based? I ask > because 2.4 is supposed to have stateful inspection, which makes firewall > a much more applicable term. i would like that also very much > > I'd be interested in helping out on a firewall script system, but I don't

Re: [Leaf-devel] Vote on web & logo entries

2001-01-02 Thread Jack Coates
I like my logo best (otherwise I wouldn't have gone to the trouble of making it). Eric's web page is the nicest, though. -- Jack Coates Monkeynoodle: It's what's for dinner! On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Mike Noyes wrote: > Everyone, > I believe it's time to vote on the web and logo entries. I'd like to

Re: [Leaf-devel] Vote on web & logo entries

2001-01-02 Thread David Douthitt
On 2 Jan 2001, at 17:42, Mike Noyes wrote: > I believe it's time to vote on the web and logo entries. I like Erik Wolzak's site the best, with no changes. As for logo's, I think I like Pedro's logo best (black and white) - wasn't that it on your site, Mike? Then, I like Jack's logo for a seco

Re: [Leaf-devel] Vote on web & logo entries

2001-01-02 Thread Mike Noyes
At 03:37 PM 1/2/01 -0500, George Metz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Mike Noyes wrote: > > > Everyone, > > I believe it's time to vote on the web and logo entries. > > >Currently, Pedro's webpage entry is unreachable, Everyone, Pedro's entry should be available for viewing by to

Re: [Leaf-devel] Vote on web & logo entries

2001-01-02 Thread Mike Noyes
At 01:02 PM 1/2/01 -0800, Jack Coates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I like my logo best (otherwise I wouldn't have gone to the trouble of >making it). Eric's web page is the nicest, though. Jack, I have you voting: for Eric Wolzak's web entry. for Jack Coates's logo entry. Everyone, If you want t

Re: [Leaf-devel] Vote on web & logo entries

2001-01-02 Thread Mike Noyes
At 03:27 PM 1/2/01 -0600, you wrote: >On 2 Jan 2001, at 17:42, Mike Noyes wrote: > > > I believe it's time to vote on the web and logo entries. > >I like Erik Wolzak's site the best, with no changes. David, 1 vote for Erik Wolzak's web entry. >As for logo's, I think I like Pedro's logo best (bla

Re: [Leaf-devel] Vote on web & logo entries

2001-01-02 Thread Mike Noyes
At 04:08 PM 1/2/01 -0600, David Douthitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On 2 Jan 2001, at 22:04, Mike Noyes wrote: > > > I just fixed the links. You should be able to browse them now. I > > still haven't figured out what the SF staff did to Apache to cause > > the old links to fail. > >All of those

Re: [Leaf-devel] Vote on web & logo entries

2001-01-02 Thread David Douthitt
On 2 Jan 2001, at 22:04, Mike Noyes wrote: > >Currently, the only logo I can display webwise is Jack Coates' entry, > >just so's you know. > I just fixed the links. You should be able to browse them now. I > still haven't figured out what the SF staff did to Apache to cause > the old links to fa

Re: [Leaf-devel] Vote on web & logo entries

2001-01-02 Thread George Metz
On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Mike Noyes wrote: > Please scp it into /home/groups/ftp/pub/leaf/logo/wolfstar . I'll update > the links so everyone can take a look at it. Done. Really simple change, but hey. =) -- George Metz Commercial Routing Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] __

Re: [Leaf-devel] Packaging & Butterfly

2001-01-02 Thread Jack Coates
On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Paul Batozech wrote: > Eric Wolzak wrote: > > > > Hello > > > this sounds interesting. Is the new system going to be 2.4 based? I ask > > > because 2.4 is supposed to have stateful inspection, which makes firewall > > > a much more applicable term. > > i would like that also v

Re: [Leaf-devel] Packaging & Butterfly

2001-01-02 Thread Paul Batozech
Eric Wolzak wrote: > > Hello > > this sounds interesting. Is the new system going to be 2.4 based? I ask > > because 2.4 is supposed to have stateful inspection, which makes firewall > > a much more applicable term. > i would like that also very much > > > > I'd be interested in helping out on a

Re: [Leaf-devel] Vote on web & logo entries

2001-01-02 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
Current favorites: Web look: Eric Wolcak's site: http://leaf.sourceforge.net/ericw/index.php NOTE: I don't really care about php vs plain HTML, but the site looks cool Logos...I really have two favorites, and they're enough different I think they both have application: Simple logo: Pedro's

Re: [Leaf-devel] Vote on web & logo entries

2001-01-02 Thread Paul Batozech
Well this is tough as all are quite good, but here goes. Web Site: Eric's Logo: For a graphic type I'd say Jack's For a nice simple text type, Pedro's, the one with the vertical 'LEAF' I would change it to dark green instead of black. I think there is room for both as at times the

[Leaf-devel] Grand New Firewall Paradim

2001-01-02 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
Since no-one seems to be quite catching on to what I mean when about a new way to do firewalls, this is an attempt to explain myself. I apologize in advance for re-hashing any concepts already understood. Current solutions: Various scripts like sea-wall, Matthew Grant's scripts, and many 'click

Re: [Leaf-devel] Grand New Firewall Paradim

2001-01-02 Thread George Metz
On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: > Current solutions: > Various scripts like sea-wall, Matthew Grant's scripts, and many 'click the > box & build a script' type programs. These solutions can be very easy to > use, and configurable (to an extent), but they quickly run into problems

Re: [Leaf-devel] Vote on web & logo entries

2001-01-02 Thread Mike Noyes
At 05:28 PM 1/2/01 -0500, George Metz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Mike Noyes wrote: > > > Please scp it into /home/groups/ftp/pub/leaf/logo/wolfstar . I'll > > update the links so everyone can take a look at it. > >Done. Really simple change, but hey. =) George, It now has a l

Re: [Leaf-devel] Vote on web & logo entries

2001-01-02 Thread Mike Noyes
At 07:52 PM 1/2/01 -0600, Paul Batozech <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Well this is tough as all are quite good, but here goes. > >Web Site: Eric's Paul, One vote for Eric Wolzak's web entry. >Logo: For a graphic type I'd say Jack's One vote for Jack Coates's logo entry. > For a nice simple

Re: [Leaf-devel] Vote on web & logo entries

2001-01-02 Thread Mike Noyes
At 07:34 PM 1/2/01 -0600, "Charles Steinkuehler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Current favorites: > >Web look: >Eric Wolcak's site: >http://leaf.sourceforge.net/ericw/index.php Charles, One vote for Eric Wolzak's web entry. >NOTE: I don't really care about php vs plain HTML, but the site looks >co

Re: [Leaf-devel] Vote on web & logo entries

2001-01-02 Thread Mike Noyes
At 11:36 PM 1/2/01 -0500, George Metz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Mike Noyes wrote: > > Did you use the GIMP native xcf file to modify it? > >Nope, I opened up the .png and modded that. Considering this is the first >time - ever - that I've even started GIMP, it was a rather i

Re: [Leaf-devel] Vote on web & logo entries

2001-01-02 Thread George Metz
On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Mike Noyes wrote: > At 05:28 PM 1/2/01 -0500, George Metz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Mike Noyes wrote: > > > > > Please scp it into /home/groups/ftp/pub/leaf/logo/wolfstar . I'll > > > update the links so everyone can take a look at it. > > > >Done. Real