[Leaf-devel] Segmentation fault in Busybox

2001-04-18 Thread Eric Wolzak
Hello David and all others. Recently there was a thread about segmentation faults in busybox. I didn't have the problem before. Encountered it today for the first time. myrouter: -root- # mount -tmsdos /dev/fd0u1680 /mnt Segmentation fault but # mount -t msdos -r /dev/fd0u1680 /mnt

[Leaf-devel] Unified Embedded Platform Specification

2001-04-18 Thread Mike Noyes
Everyone, I belive this ELC announcement is significant. Opinions? Unified Embedded Platform Specification Established and Promoted by Embedded Linux Consortium Board http://www.embedded-linux.org/pressroom.php3#66 -- Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://leaf.sourceforge.net/

Re: [Leaf-devel] Unified Embedded Platform Specification

2001-04-18 Thread Jack Coates
that sounds like a good thing. -- Jack Coates Monkeynoodle: It's what's for dinner! On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Mike Noyes wrote: > Everyone, > I belive this ELC announcement is significant. Opinions? > > Unified Embedded Platform Specification Established and > Promoted by Embedded Linux Consortium

Re: [Leaf-devel] Unified Embedded Platform Specification

2001-04-18 Thread Mike Noyes
Mike Noyes, 2001-04-18 08:52 -0700 >Everyone, >I belive this ELC announcement is significant. Opinions? > >Unified Embedded Platform Specification Established and >Promoted by Embedded Linux Consortium Board >http://www.embedded-linux.org/pressroom.php3#66 For those that are interested, a dissent

Re: [Leaf-devel] Unified Embedded Platform Specification

2001-04-18 Thread Scott C. Best
Mike: I agree: a potentially watershed article. Quoting from a juicy bit: "Our objective is to encourage the adoption of a single unified embedded Linux 'platform' for embedded middleware and application software, so that software developers can rely upon the APIs being available in a

Re: [Leaf-devel] Unified Embedded Platform Specification

2001-04-18 Thread Mike Noyes
Scott C. Best, 2001-04-18 19:58 -0700 >Mike: > > I agree: a potentially watershed article. Quoting >from a juicy bit: > > Cool. This will make my echowall porting efforts >go that much smoother. ;) Scott, I like the idea, but not who proposed it. Inder Singh's opinions concern me