On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Ewald Wasscher wrote:
> > Perhaps a way to think about it is from the point of view
> > of the newcomer.
>
> I think we really should.
Agreed. This, however, is more a function of marketing than the
engineering behind it. Easy enough to do, once we have that base system
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Scott C. Best wrote:
> George:
>
> Sorry for the late reply...
Not a problem. I've only off-and-on been paying attention to e-mail and
stuff I've been working on the past few days.
> I more or less agree with your generalization. I think
> Eigerstein proves your
On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Mike Sensney wrote:
> >Okay. I got the basic-level kernel compiled. Here's what we have:
> >
> >-rw-r--r-- 1 wolfstar root 470k Apr 23 16:14 kernel.standard
> >-rw-r--r-- 1 wolfstar root 404k Apr 23 16:15 kernel.upx
> >
> >Before we get too excited, I'm st
On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Jack Coates wrote:
> I rather like this idea. Might be a pipe dream, but would be nice.
Pipe dream, no, but a little ways off most likely. Lot of work to be done
there for starters, just setting up the parameters for the config file
mods, such as setting the variables. It's
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Eric Wolzak wrote:
> The problem was that the exclude option
> overrides
> the include option.
> I used the following command
> tar -c -v `cat $INCLUDE` -X $EXCLUDE | gzip
> >$DIR/$PACKAGE.lrp
So, uh, call me stupid and feel free to point and laugh and stuff, but
can't y
Mike Noyes, 2001-04-24 15:21 -0700
>Mike Noyes, 2001-04-24 12:19 -0700
>>Our site is down again. I think the SF staff is working on my support
>>request. As soon as I know more I'll post an update.
>>
>>[ #418583 ] Unable to change MySQL password
>>https://sourceforge.net/tracker \
>>/?func=detai
At 04:44 AM 04/25/2001 -0400, George Metz wrote
>On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Mike Sensney wrote:
> > Would it possible to create a "base" .config then create a series of
> patch
> > files to modify the .config file? Would this be manageable or would it
> be a
> > can of worms best not visited?
>
>It's
For those working on updating EigerStein, there are a couple of things I
recently remembered that should not be overlooked:
Migrate the POSIXness script (/bin/grep) to the multi-file version I created
for LRP 2.9.8 (easier to edit/maintain, and it runs faster)
Grab the updated vi and new pico co
Charles Steinkuehler, 2001-04-25 12:45 -0500
>I'm currently banging on the ELJ eval kit, trying to get it to do
>something useful...I'll report on BlueCat linux when I get a bit farther
>along. They do something like we were talking about for development.
>They build an entire directory structure
> Charles Steinkuehler, 2001-04-25 12:45 -0500
> >I'm currently banging on the ELJ eval kit, trying to get it to do
> >something useful...I'll report on BlueCat linux when I get a bit farther
> >along. They do something like we were talking about for development.
> >They build an entire directory
Am Montag, 23. April 2001 20:41 schrieben Sie:
> KP Kirchdörfer wrote:
>
> >> 22-4add e3 (the pre 1.5 from oxygen) as the default editor
> >
> > Is this a version of e3, which don't make a backup of the original file?
> > This feature of e3 is just wasting space, especially within lrcfg.
>
>
Hello all
I just finished my early beta version of a shellscript based weblet.
It is ment to configurate a firewall with shorewall, but this does a lot
more as iptables include also portforwarding etc.
IMHO The rules are also more logical, as the routing is done before
with destination nat o
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Mike Sensney wrote:
> >It's easily possible, yes. The only problem I see is that there may be
> >issues where it's best left to the person building the kernel to go in and
> >verify by hand. [...]
>
> Not a problem. Use the base config and appropriate standard patches to
> cr
13 matches
Mail list logo
