Re: [leaf-devel] 2.6.x kernel support?

2005-08-23 Thread Mike Noyes
On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 10:25, Homer Parker wrote: > The Gentoo Network APpliance (GNAP) is an embedded distro using 2.6 and > initramfs. Homer, It looks like Bering uClibc for kernel 2.6. The only bad thing I see is GNAPs 16MB footprint. This is probably caused by the kernel and lack of busybox in

Re: [leaf-devel] 2.6.x kernel support?

2005-08-23 Thread Homer Parker
On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 08:26 -0700, Mike Noyes wrote: > Homer, > It looks like Bering uClibc for kernel 2.6. The only bad thing I see is > GNAPs 16MB footprint. This is probably caused by the kernel and lack of > busybox in GNAP. Yea, but might give some ideas on the conversion. Though, as

Re: [leaf-devel] 2.6.x kernel support?

2005-08-23 Thread Natanael Copa
I CC this to gentoo-embedded since it is related to both. Mike Noyes wrote: >On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 10:25, Homer Parker wrote: > > >>The Gentoo Network APpliance (GNAP) is an embedded distro using 2.6 and >>initramfs. >> >> > >Homer, >It looks like Bering uClibc for kernel 2.6. The only bad

Re: [leaf-devel] 2.6.x kernel support?

2005-08-23 Thread Mike Noyes
On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 09:14, Natanael Copa wrote: > I have been working on a proof-of-concept distro lately that I would > like to describe as something in between GNAP and Bering uClibc. The > codename is Alpine. > The purpose is a Bearing uClibc like distro that is scaleable, that can > update p

Re: [leaf-devel] 2.6.x kernel support?

2005-08-23 Thread Mike Noyes
On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 09:06, Homer Parker wrote: > On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 08:26 -0700, Mike Noyes wrote: > > It looks like Bering uClibc for kernel 2.6. The only bad thing I see is > > GNAPs 16MB footprint. This is probably caused by the kernel and lack of > > busybox in GNAP. > > Yea, but mi

Re: [leaf-devel] Re: Guides

2005-08-23 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Mike; I still don't see that bucu-upnpd.html is updated in the Bering-uClibc User's Guide. kp Am Mittwoch 17 August 2005 19:17 schrieb Mike Noyes: > On Fri, 2005-08-05 at 02:33, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: > > can please restart the job who generates the guides? > > KP, > I'm still performing manual

Re: [leaf-devel] 2.6.x kernel support?

2005-08-23 Thread Natanael Copa
Mike Noyes wrote: >Natanael, >Would you like to join us, and make Alpine a LEAF branch? > > Thank you very much for the invitation. I have to think about it (talk with some other ppl too), but that is not impossible. You should know that Alpine will sacrifice size for faster development. I a

Re: [leaf-devel] Re: Guides

2005-08-23 Thread Mike Noyes
On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 15:00, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: > I still don't see that bucu-upnpd.html is updated in the Bering-uClibc > User's Guide. KP, The chapter linked below? I built from cvs, and it should be current. Would you like me to build our documentation again? Chapter 17. Configure

Re: [leaf-devel] 2.6.x kernel support?

2005-08-23 Thread E . Spakman
Mike, Homer, >> >> Yea, but might give some ideas on the conversion. Though, asides from a >> floppy, what can you buy today that wouldn't hold a 16MB image? > > Homer, > Not much. > LEAF runs in RAM, so it's not only a matter of 16 Mb storage but also the availability of internal RAM. This shoul