Larry & All
>>I think that will work but I hope the documentation will also be changed
>>as It has been the same since LRP day
I'll write a little something for that now that I have started to dive into
the XLM documentation :-)
Best regards
Jørn
-Original Message-
From: Larry Platzek
Hello Jorn & All,
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006, Jorn Eriksen wrote:
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 17:48:26 +0200
From: Jorn Eriksen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 'Larry Platzek' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [leaf-devel] Hosts.deny & hosts.allow
Hello Larry & All,
What I wan
Hi Larry and Jorn,
please post plain text messages only - text + HTML can be rejected by
the list-server/list-admin.
> I expected others to have said some for or against the proposed change.
> Oh well...
This has been discussed about two weeks ago on leaf-user (which was the
reason I didn't say a
Martin Hejl wrote:
The short version is that it's a sane default, and somebody who wants to
get rid of libwrap checking can simply add "ALL: ALL" to hosts.allow.
IMHO, the default config should not be as open as possible, but rather
as secure as possible, and somebody who wants to open the box to
Paul G Rogers wrote:
I second the opinion that the server LFS needs must be beyond reproach,
like Caesar's wife.
Took me a while to realize (I think) that you were not talking about
Linux From Scratch (LFS). I thought they were above reproach already :-)
(I do not personally endorse any add
Martin & All
>>This has been discussed about two weeks ago on leaf-user (which was the
>>reason I didn't say anything earlier).
I've given up trying to floow all the users lists for all my projects thus I
did not see that discussion. I've read trough and it seams to me that there
is issues with l
