> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Mike Noyes
> Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 5:55 PM
> To: leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [leaf-devel] Project description
>
> On Thu, 2008-03-06 at 18:58 +0100, Martin Hejl wrote:
> >
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Martin Hejl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> this is a little depressing. After spending years (and tons of emails)
> discussing the need for a kernel 2.6 version of LEAF, there has been no
> response on this list on the topic. Is somebody actually interes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
| Everyone,
| We seem to have agreement on a name switch from Firewall to Framework. I
| think we can make this change now, and continue work on a description
| for later adoption. Is this acceptable?
|
| Mike Noyes +1
Charles Steinkuehler +1
- --
Ch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Erich Titl wrote:
| Actually playing with e1000 for 2.4 reset me a little lately. Definitely
| I am convinced that if LEAF wants to go on strongly we need to be on par
| with other project which do similar work, e.g. 2.6 is a must.
|
| And for all you
Hi Nicol,
thanks for your feedback,
> I had no trouble running the 3.1 release candidate with a static 2.6 kernel;
Well, but doesn't a static kernel (I assume you mean that everything you
needed was compiled into the kernel statically, rather than as a module)
pretty much stand against everythin
Hi Charles,
> Besides driver issues, another reason to migrate to a 2.6 kernel is
> support for IPV6, which will become vastly more important in the years
> to come, particularly outside the US, where the IPV4 address pool is
> already beginning to be exhausted.
Good point. I haven't had to touch
oops - sorry
> Hi Nicol,
make that "Hi David"
sorry about that
Martin
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct
> But sooner or later, floppy support will have to go anyway - since there
> won't be any new systems that are shipped with a floppy. For embedded
Who dedicates a new box to running a LEAF firewall with all the free
old boxes around? ;-)
"But seriously folks", for those who DO use old hardware t
