Re: [leaf-devel] [leaf:bering-uclibc] New commit by kapeka

2015-12-11 Thread Erich Titl
Hi Folks I am working on new Kernel config stuff, based on 4.1.13 and I would like to get this work into maint. Am 11.12.2015 um 16:49 schrieb LEAF Linux Embedded Appliance Framework Git repository: > > Branch: maint > > kernel: updated to upstream version 4.1.14 Could someone please let m

Re: [leaf-devel] [leaf:bering-uclibc] New commit by kapeka

2015-12-11 Thread Andrew
Just merge, and rename your configs to 4.1.14... 11.12.2015 19:52, Erich Titl пишет: > Hi Folks > > I am working on new Kernel config stuff, based on 4.1.13 and I would > like to get this work into maint. > > Am 11.12.2015 um 16:49 schrieb LEAF Linux Embedded Appliance Framework > Git repository:

Re: [leaf-devel] [leaf:bering-uclibc] New commit by kapeka

2015-12-11 Thread Erich Titl
Am 11.12.2015 um 20:40 schrieb Andrew: > Just merge, and rename your configs to 4.1.14... This, I believe, is insufficient, as the configs have changed and we store just the cdiffs now cheers Erich -- ___

Re: [leaf-devel] [leaf:bering-uclibc] New commit by kapeka

2015-12-11 Thread Andrew
I'm not sure that configs are changed... 11.12.2015 21:57, Erich Titl пишет: > Am 11.12.2015 um 20:40 schrieb Andrew: >> Just merge, and rename your configs to 4.1.14... > This, I believe, is insufficient, as the configs have changed and we > store just the cdiffs now > > cheers > > Erich > > > >

Re: [leaf-devel] [leaf:bering-uclibc] New commit by kapeka

2015-12-11 Thread Erich Titl
Am 11.12.2015 um 21:16 schrieb Andrew: > I'm not sure that configs are changed... Yes, I know, but the config headers for sure, if they were built with 'make oldconfig'. And I don't know if there were any new options introduced with 4.1.14, so safe thinking makes me assume this. cheers ET

Re: [leaf-devel] [leaf:bering-uclibc] New commit by kapeka

2015-12-11 Thread kp kirchdoerfer
Am Samstag, 12. Dezember 2015, 01:17:30 schrieb Erich Titl: > Am 11.12.2015 um 21:16 schrieb Andrew: > > I'm not sure that configs are changed... > > Yes, I know, but the config headers for sure, if they were built with > 'make oldconfig'. And I don't know if there were any new options > introduce