On Sunday 20 January 2002 00:31, David Goodrich wrote:
i tried using the _ and it didn't work. unless being on the
internal network has something to do with it ...
http://complex.wox.org... any ideas? thanks in advance
-david
Is the complex.wox.org your site? If so, it works from here. I
Hi Charles,
If I check my /lib folder in the dachstein floppy release I get the
impression that
you are using glibc 2.1.3 (because of the filenames).
But I can't seem to find any confirmations on that major change in the docs.
Am I missing something? Is dachstein floppy using 2.1.3 or
Ray Olszewski wrote:
snip
Having found it, we still have to fix it. I don't use the Dach default
firewall, but someone else can tell you the edit for it ... or you can try
scanning the list archives (the external-privvate-address problem comes up
regularly on the list). [Mike, is this problem
At 13:24 20/01/2002, Ewald Wasscher wrote:
Kim Oppalfens wrote:
Hi Charles,
If I check my /lib folder in the dachstein floppy release I get the
impression that
you are using glibc 2.1.3 (because of the filenames).
Ecuse me, but when I list /lib I see for example:
libc-2.0.7.so
and not
PS - for those who use rtl8139.o - the new 8139too.o is on the CD.
I'll soon build a test machine (I have a PPPOE connection I want to see if
upgrading the cpu I use on my firewall would improve my connection
speed by how much) that will uses rtl8139 NICs and I was wondering was
advantage
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would any of the people who already tried (and preferably succeeded)
upgraded to glibc 2.1.3 give a little bit more explanation at how it is done?
I am running a dual floppy eigerstein for the moment and would like a shot.
I'm not sure if this is still a
At 16:45 20/01/2002, Nicolas Riendeau wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Comments inline
Would any of the people who already tried (and preferably succeeded)
upgraded to glibc 2.1.3 give a little bit more explanation at how it is done?
I am running a dual floppy eigerstein for the moment and
On Sunday 20 January 2002 08:48, Nicolas Riendeau wrote:
Is there really an advantage to using one over the other (the page at
http://www.scyld.com/network/rtl8139.html#8139too kinda makes me
wonder...)
No, there doesn't seem to be an _advantage_ to using *too. From the
linked info, it seems
Kim Oppalfens wrote:
At 16:45 20/01/2002, Nicolas Riendeau wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
According to the following URL
http://www.gnu.org/software/libc/FAQ.html#s-2.27
most of what has been compiled for glibc 2.0 should work with glibc
2.1 so I hadn't recompiled any of the
Anyone know how to get rid of this error in the logs? Running IPSec 1.91
from Charles site on Dachstien CD 1.02.
router kernel: ip_demasq_esp(): Inbound from 65.xx.xx.xx SPI EBC4FE83 has no
masq table entry
Thanks
___
Leaf-user mailing list
Am Freitag, 18. Januar 2002 08:48 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Aanhalen Nicolas Riendeau [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Would any of the people who already tried (and preferably
succeeded) upgraded to glibc 2.1.3 give a little bit more
explanation at how it is done? I am running a dual floppy
eigerstein
I've done this ISO-Image and it is a little bit more than just to
replace libraries (see the README). The few other necessary changes
We where both talking (I think?) of what was needed to go from glibc 2.0
to glibc 2.13. Your image goes beyond only changing the librairies
(it corrects a
Nicolas Riendeau wrote:
[Actually, double Oops since I forgot to post in on the mailing list...]
Oops, I forgot something...
I'm not sure if this is still a requirement with Dachstein but
with ES2B the
libraries apperently had to be stored in root.lrp (it would crash
otherwise, I
Hello,
I need some help working with LRP.
I have the Eigerstein pppoe version beta 0.4
running on an old Pentium box as my router.
Internet connection is a dynamic IP via ADSL from Earthlink.
(I want static IP, but Earthlink tells me,
Static IP has been used up in your area.
Call Verizon for
Hi all,
I have set up a stock EB2 box at my wife's house (she's in school, not that
it matters :)) and it works (sort of). Here is my situation/problem(s).
1. The provider here in Blacksburg is providing ethernet directly, and is
offering a static external address, but only for external
Morgan Reed wrote:
Hi all,
I have set up a stock EB2 box at my wife's house (she's in school, not that
it matters :)) and it works (sort of). Here is my situation/problem(s).
1. The provider here in Blacksburg is providing ethernet directly, and is
offering a static external address,
Tom Atwater wrote:
snip
There is a newer Dachstein-PPPoE package available here:
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/khadley/
The current problem I have is this:
When Earthlink updates the dynamic IP,
the LRP box does not update the port forwarding
from address with the new dynamic IP.
That's
hi all,
hi Bela
I've tried your advice but there's still some problems.
1. secondary legal_IP of eth0 wasn't recognized by the outside world. the
ping retruned request timed out but I could ping it from my internal
network.
2. from my internal network I could open the web page of both the
I'm on Sympatico in Ontario and notice that my ip changes quite
frequently. It is stable for a week, then I get bumped twice in a single
day. Now, the system renegotiates just fine, however, because network.conf
has not been re-run, all my port forwards are broken until I do so
(which doesn't
Gregor --
First, which address is which. Using the FQDNs you mention below, I find
they both resolve, as follows:
inf.uajy.ac.id = 202.149.81.61
mail.uajy.ac.id = 202.149.81.55
Replies to your specific questions assume these are the right FQDNs and I am
resolving them to the
At 20:06 20.01.2002 -0800, you wrote:
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 00:34:25 +0100
From: Ewald Wasscher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tom Atwater [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Leaf-user] Updating port forwarding with dynamic IP
Tom Atwater wrote:
snip
There is a newer Dachstein-PPPoE
21 matches
Mail list logo
