Re: [leaf-user] Using HOSTS file

2002-06-06 Thread Ray Olszewski
At 12:07 AM 6/6/02 -0500, guitarlynn wrote: On Wednesday 05 June 2002 21:54, John Mullan wrote: I have tried that as well. It allows the LEAF box to resolve mullan.dns2go.com to 192.168.1.128 (by using PING on the LEAF box) but nobody else on the network. They still get the external IP as

[leaf-user] port forwarding to DMZ

2002-06-06 Thread GREGOR
Hi, I'm using DCD-1.02 and has been working great. So far I've been using DMZ=PRIVATE to do port forwarding. I put them in DMZ_SERVER0 to DMZ_SERVER4 switch, and they're working fine. . . . DMZ_SERVER4=tcp 64.110.181.168 110 192.168.15.202 110 Now I have new servers, I put them in

RE: [leaf-user] Using HOSTS file

2002-06-06 Thread Erich Titl
Hi At 09:33 06.06.2002, you wrote: Message: 9 From: John Mullan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Lee Kimber' [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [leaf-user] Using HOSTS file Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 22:54:53 -0400 At 08:38 PM 6/5/2002 -0400, you wrote: I use DNS2GO to handle my

Re: [leaf-user] Using HOSTS file

2002-06-06 Thread Brad Fritz
On Thu, 06 Jun 2002 00:09:38 PDT Ray Olszewski wrote: Jeff's response is the right one here -- the router (or some other host on the LAN) needs to run a DNS server that resolves FQNs of hosts on the LAN to their private addresses and forwards all other requests to a real nameserver. The

Re: [leaf-user] port forwarding to DMZ

2002-06-06 Thread Jon Clausen
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 02:34:13PM +0700, GREGOR wrote: How do I solve this problem? Are the switches limited for only 5 DMZ? I have nine entries like that, which work as intended, so no there's no limit. (Not at 5 anyway ;) But you have three external IPs... Are you certain that works? If

Re: [leaf-user] Bering, non-root crontab and more...

2002-06-06 Thread Greg Morgan
Jon Clausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip resulting QUERY_STRING, and echo back to a new page. This all works pretty much as I want it, even if my sed scripts *are* a bit clunky... Next step will be to have that data written to a file instead of just out to a page. Now, since this whole

[leaf-user] linksys wmp11 wireless network card

2002-06-06 Thread Kim Oppalfens
Hi all, has anyone had any succes using this wireless nic or does anyone know of a pretty cheap wireless pci adapter that works with bering? Thanks in advance Kim ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's

Re: [leaf-user] Bering, non-root crontab and more...

2002-06-06 Thread Jon Clausen
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 02:46:01AM -0700, Greg Morgan wrote: Take it one step at a time. I'd make a backup of the files you will be modifying. Experiment with what you want to do as root, then worry about the uid thing. It is not like you're going to have to send hours reinstalling a

Re: [leaf-user] Using HOSTS file

2002-06-06 Thread guitarlynn
On Thursday 06 June 2002 02:09, Ray Olszewski wrote: At 12:07 AM 6/6/02 -0500, guitarlynn wrote: By chance have any of you attempted to declare files before dns in /etc/nsswitch.conf??? By doing this, any host/network listed in nsswitch.conf should resolve according to the order listed in

[leaf-user] rebooting

2002-06-06 Thread J
Okay, i've come to the conclusion that bering (at least in my config) can't reboot my machine. That said, what would be the best way of achieving the same effect as a reboot? ie. how would I flush everything and rerun all the startup scripts? I need to do this, as pump is incapable of holding

Re: [leaf-user] rebooting

2002-06-06 Thread guitarlynn
On Thursday 06 June 2002 10:25, J wrote: Okay, i've come to the conclusion that bering (at least in my config) can't reboot my machine. That said, what would be the best way of achieving the same effect as a reboot? ie. how would I flush everything and rerun all the startup scripts? Change

Re: [leaf-user] rebooting

2002-06-06 Thread T Burt
On Thu, 6 Jun 2002, J wrote: The fact that you are unable to reboot indicates that you have a problem. This could be a hardware problem or a configuration issue. Reloading the init scripts is not likely to fix your problem, so heading in that direction is not advised. Try the generic lrp

[leaf-user] lrpkg bug?

2002-06-06 Thread Jeff Newmiller
I inadvertently used the .lrp extension yesterday, as in # lrpkg -i sshd.lrp instead of # lrpkg -i sshd and to my later surprise, it worked. (... perhaps because I was working from an msdos filesystem?) Unfortunately, when I later went to backup sshd, the backup screen showed it as

Re: [leaf-user] Combining NAT with PAT

2002-06-06 Thread Omar D. Samuels
One learns something new everyday... does PAT stand for Private Address Translation? Is it different from NAR (Network Address Retention)? Okay, just wanting to learn. Thanks. - Original Message - From: Nachman Yaakov Ziskind [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday,

[leaf-user] Combining NAT with PAT

2002-06-06 Thread Nachman Yaakov Ziskind
I'd like to combine NAT with PAT in Dachstein 1.0.2; e.g. to have private addresses on 10.1.1 to PAT to a single public IP number, except for 10.1.1.[1- 5], which should each NAT to a (separate and distinct) public IP address. I've looked through the FAQ's, the sample network.conf/ipfilter.conf

[leaf-user] Zeroing out ipchains

2002-06-06 Thread Nachman Yaakov Ziskind
Say, how come I can't zero out the ipchains counters? # ipchains -nvL Chain input (policy ACCEPT: 15420 packets, 3599705 bytes): Chain forward (policy ACCEPT: 178 packets, 13155 bytes): Chain output (policy ACCEPT: 8343 packets, 3177138 bytes): # ipchains --zero # ipchains -nvL Chain input

Re: [leaf-user] Combining NAT with PAT

2002-06-06 Thread Nachman Yaakov Ziskind
Omar D. Samuels wrote (on Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 05:09:49PM -0500): | What do you mean, I still don't understand. | | | One learns something new everyday... does PAT stand for Private Address | | Translation? | | NAT = Network Address Translation (one to one). | PAT = Port Address Translation

Re: [leaf-user] Zeroing out ipchains

2002-06-06 Thread Jeff Newmiller
On Thu, 6 Jun 2002, Nachman Yaakov Ziskind wrote: Say, how come I can't zero out the ipchains counters? You can... some of them. # ipchains -nvL Chain input (policy ACCEPT: 15420 packets, 3599705 bytes): Chain forward (policy ACCEPT: 178 packets, 13155 bytes): Chain output (policy ACCEPT:

[leaf-user] Port Forwarding Failure

2002-06-06 Thread James K. Wiggs
Hello Folks, Uncertain which mailing list is the correct and active one, so I'm posting to both. I'm trying to get voice over IP working between two boxes; each is behind a basic EigerStein LRP box, both configured as firewalls. Almost all ports on both boxes are closed. One of the boxes

RE: [leaf-user] Using HOSTS file

2002-06-06 Thread John Mullan
OK Brad. I've put tinydns on. I left the tinydns option for internal IP at 127.0.0.1 Is this the proper loopback interface address? -Original Message- From: Brad Fritz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 4:42 AM To: John Mullan Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re:

Re: [leaf-user] Combining NAT with PAT

2002-06-06 Thread Jeff Newmiller
On Thu, 6 Jun 2002, Nachman Yaakov Ziskind wrote: Omar D. Samuels wrote (on Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 05:09:49PM -0500): | What do you mean, I still don't understand. | | | One learns something new everyday... does PAT stand for Private Address | | Translation? | | NAT = Network Address

Re: [leaf-user] Using HOSTS file

2002-06-06 Thread Brad Fritz
On Thu, 06 Jun 2002 20:40:25 EDT you wrote: OK Brad. I've put tinydns on. I left the tinydns option for internal IP at 127.0.0.1 Is this the proper loopback interface address? Yes, it is: $ cat /etc/tinydns-private/env/IP 127.0.0.1 --Brad

[leaf-user] tftp and network.conf

2002-06-06 Thread jofficer
I'm trying to get something working at work, and I need to be able to allow tftp and ultimately an x-server. first I assume that I can add a a few lines into the network.conf similar to the following EXTERN_UDP_PORTS=ip.ad.dr.es/32_tftp EXTERN_PROTO0=69 ip.ad.dr.es/32 I would presumably also

Re: [leaf-user] Port Forwarding Failure

2002-06-06 Thread guitarlynn
On Thursday 06 June 2002 18:12, James K. Wiggs wrote: running OpenH323 and GnomeMeeting 0.85; the other is an NT 4.0 box running NetMeeting 3.01. I've configured snip Load the ip_masq_h323 module in /etc/modules. This is a helper module to get it to work right. -- ~Lynn Avants aka

RE: [leaf-user] Using HOSTS file

2002-06-06 Thread John Mullan
Thanks for you help so far Brad.. I'm sure I'm missing something, but no luck. I had tried to set it up so that dnscache watches 192.168.1.254 and looks to tinydns. Not sure if that is what is supposed to happen or if I even got it that way in any of my attempted combinations. If it

Re: [leaf-user] Combining NAT with PAT

2002-06-06 Thread Richard Doyle
On Thu, 2002-06-06 at 15:35, Nachman Yaakov Ziskind wrote: Omar D. Samuels wrote (on Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 05:09:49PM -0500): | What do you mean, I still don't understand. | | | One learns something new everyday... does PAT stand for Private Address | | Translation? | | NAT = Network

Re: [leaf-user] Using HOSTS file

2002-06-06 Thread Michael D. Schleif
John Mullan wrote: Thanks for you help so far Brad.. I'm sure I'm missing something, but no luck. I had tried to set it up so that dnscache watches 192.168.1.254 and looks to tinydns. Not sure if that is what is supposed to happen or if I even got it that way in any of my

Re: [leaf-user] Using HOSTS file

2002-06-06 Thread Brad Fritz
On Thu, 06 Jun 2002 23:01:43 EDT you wrote: Thanks for you help so far Brad.. Glad to help. I'm sure I'm missing something, but no luck. I had tried to set it up so that dnscache watches 192.168.1.254 and looks to tinydns. Not sure if that is what is supposed to happen or if I even

[leaf-user] (no subject)

2002-06-06 Thread Brad Fritz
Fcc: +sent Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Using HOSTS file In-reply-to: Your message of Thu, 06 Jun 2002 22:40:16 CDT. [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Thu, 06 Jun 2002 22:40:16 CDT mds wrote: John Mullan wrote: To recap: The plan is to force internal network to resolve