Michael, I think you have confused the issue for John. There is nothing
magic about the last two pieces of a domain name; a DNS server can assert
it is authoritative for a domain name that has 3 or 4 or 5 pieces.
(Examples are fairly common in TLDs that end in country codes; for example,
here
Good day,
I am trying to get 2 leased-line modems to connect using multilink. I am
unsure which file does what and hope that someone has some guidance for me,
please.
TIA
Glyn
__
The information contained in this email is intended solely for the
use
Oops. Bloody. Forgot to mention that I had that module
installed, as well:
# lsmod
Module PagesUsed by
ip_masq_h3236868 0 (unused)
ip_masq_mfw 3076 0 (unused)
ip_masq_portfw 2296 12
ip_masq_autofw 2356 0 (unused)
ip_masq_user
Gentlemen,
My BERING box seems to be having some connection problems. I'm on aDSL using
PPP PPPoE to connect. My connection will stay up for a period of time, up to
a couple of days, then reconnect, last a few hours and then fail. It then
requires a reboot to reconnect. Here's a logfile
Ray Olszewski wrote (on Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 11:38:09PM -0700):
| One low-tech solution that should work, BTW, is to add the hostname/IP
| address pair to the hosts file on each workatation (/etc/hosts for Linux
| workstations; I don't know the WinXX analog, though I do know there is
| one).
Following the instructions in
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bupppoe.html#AEN343
I added the net/ppp0/- line to the Interfaces file and commented out the
eth0 line. Should I have left eth0 in? Do I need the dhcp, routefilter,
and norfc1918 options added to the ppp0 line?
#ZONE
Tom, I'm with you on all of the points below, except the dial-up. These
instructions are specific to pppoe. There's a separate dial-up page, and
these appear to have been copied and pasted from there and should be
updated.
Thanks for all of your work on Shorewall!
George
PS. I have since
On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, George Luft wrote:
Following the instructions in
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bupppoe.html#AEN343
I added the net/ppp0/- line to the Interfaces file and commented out the
eth0 line. Should I have left eth0 in?
No.
Do I need the dhcp, routefilter,
and
Another question for the list: can Linux cum Dachstein
a) alias the eth0
(external) interface to multiple ip numbers (in SCO unix we use 'ifconfig
alias'
Yes
b) pass along somehow (to ipchains or whatever) which ip number the
packet arrived with?
Of course...this is pretty much *ALWAYS*
Hej All!
Since several Weeks I got the following problem, that doesn't seem to be
normal.
I use a dachstein 1.02.1 with glibc 2.1.3 on CD and the hardware is a IBM
PC 330 (P-166) with 64 MBytes RAM ant two Realtek 8139 NICs. The system is
stable and doing everything I want, but:
After the
Possible? Yeah sure, I suppose it is possible. But you'd do better to
give us a more systematic profile of what the router is doing if you want
good opinions.
The load average numbers that various apps report are sort of odd things.
They don't represent a true system load, at least not to my
Hello Georg
Are these (Bering) modules necessary for pppoe?
ppp_async.o
AFAIK no
ppp_deflate.o
could be useful by decompressing
AFAIK no
ppp_mppe.o
They don't show up in lsmod.
Correct
They are not loaded in the standard setup .
That's nearly 70KB. Ka-ching!
uncompressed that is :)
Boris,
On Fri, 07 Jun 2002 09:28:43 PDT Ray wrote:
1. How does CPU utilization change with this change in load? If you have
top available, it calculates and reports the numbers I have in mind; if
not, you'll need to get the raw data from /proc/stat and do the arithmetic
yourself.
Looks
You most definitely want a 2.14.18 or later kernel with netfilter.
The iptables tool for configuring netfilter can do, probably,
anything you want.
You can start with Dachstein or Bering and roll your own kernel,
though Bering is probably fine as is.
If you are a serious experimenter, I would
I have been combing the list archive for info and it seems clear the configuring at
least Dachstein or other than Bering with two active external interfaces is indeed a
daunting task. Getting the two interfaces to work looks fairly easy, it is then all
about the firewall.
A fairly
Eric,
Thanks for the swift response. SHOREWALL is fine, and lets everything I want in
and out. It's not that the PPPoE connection goes down and comes back up again,
I appreciate that is what my ISP does, it's just that the PPP connection
accasionally goes down and stays down, requiring a
On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Richard Amerman wrote:
I have been combing the list archive for info and it seems clear the
configuring at least Dachstein or other than Bering with two active
external interfaces is indeed a daunting task. Getting the two
interfaces to work looks fairly easy, it is then
I am running Bering and connecting to it via SSH using puTTY as my
client--from the outside. Everything works fine but in my syslog, exactly
every minute, I get a packet dropped and logged on port 20041 from my client
IP. I've poked around on the web and found some vague references to SSH, so
I appreciate the reply Tom!
You have just caught me digging through your Shorewall site in search of hints on this
very topic. I have also just downloaded the Shorewall 1.3.1 lrp and was about to send
a message to the LEAF list to see if anyone had tried using this version with the
I assume you use pap for pppoe : ?
if so then you don't need provider, isp login script
Here are my PPP/PPPoE scripts. Are the settings valid for a dynamically
assigned aDSL connection?
Provider file:
# ISP pppd options file
# What follows is OK for Compuserve
#
noauth
debug
Is there a suggested standard way to set up static routes with Oxygen?
I'm looking for something similar to /etc/sysconf/static-routes
If not, how does Bering or Dachstein do this?
Thanks in advance.
___
Don't miss the 2002
Le Vendredi 7 Juin 2002 15:12, George Luft a écrit :
Following the instructions in
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bupppoe.html#AEN343
snip
B/ The masq file (entry 7). With a dial-up modem setup it should look like:
(...)
#INTERFACE SUBNET
ppp0eth0
Hi,
I'm doing something a little different this time. I have 1 routable IP and
2 private networks which I want to masquerade from behind the firewall, but
keep separate from each other. The eth1 network works great, masquerades
like it's supposed to, NAT's like it's supposed to. However, my
I'm doing something a little different this time. I have 1 routable IP
and
2 private networks which I want to masquerade from behind the firewall,
but
keep separate from each other. The eth1 network works great, masquerades
like it's supposed to, NAT's like it's supposed to. However, my
Hi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote the following at 05:03
07.06.2002:
To recap: The plan is to force internal network to resolve
MULLAN.DNS2GO.COM to 192.168.1.128. External requests of course will
already find their way to 192.168.1.128 via the INTERN_SERVERS in
network.conf
You are trying to masq
Thanks Charles, worked like a charm. However, I don't see *how* it
works. This notation suggest to me that all internal traffic is going
over eth1, but I know it's not because I have them physically separated
on different switches.
INTERN_IF=eth1
INTERN_NET=192.168.1.0/24 192.168.212.0/24
Thanks Charles, worked like a charm. However, I don't see *how* it works.
This notation suggest to me that all internal traffic is going over eth1,
but I know it's not because I have them physically separated on different
switches.
INTERN_IF=eth1
INTERN_NET=192.168.1.0/24 192.168.212.0/24
Boy, this seems to be the thread that never ends. :) I have to
politely disagree on several of your statements, Erich. tinydns
and dnscache config files for a working setup are included below
as well.
Re-quoted slightly for readability...
On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 10:51:02PM +0200, Erich Titl
I'm running Dachstein, and I was wondering if there were an packages to
throttle bandwidth. The reason I ask is that at my work we rent out
space to some other people, and they share our T1. Problem is they are
hogging bandwidth and even if institute some rule or policy, I still
want to make sure
Jonathan Berglund wrote:
I'm running Dachstein, and I was wondering if there were an packages to
throttle bandwidth. The reason I ask is that at my work we rent out
space to some other people, and they share our T1. Problem is they are
hogging bandwidth and even if institute some rule or
Sounds like I started something!! Just to add fuel to the fire (or more
hopefully, slow it down), I do know that since 'mullan.dns2go.com' is a
smaller 'chunk' of names to resolve that it is possible to have the
server understand that DNS2GO.COM domain gets resolved out-of-house but
Hi, John. Sounds like you're getting close. More inline...
On Fri, 07 Jun 2002 20:39:21 EDT John Mullan wrote:
I have made all the required changes. I even changed the network.conf.
The variable you mention seems to be CONFIG_DNS=NO
Resolv.conf still gets overwritten with 'nameserver
UPDATE: I have found where the changes to resolv.conf are coming from.
Dhclient.conf and data coming from my ISP DHCP server.
I have managed to overide this behaviour with 'prepend' and 'supersede'
and end up with a resolv.conf looking like this:
search nimc1.on.cogeco.ca
nameserver
33 matches
Mail list logo
