Sorry to disagree with Lynn, but the magic words here are quite a while.
This strongly suggests to me that an earlier guess, that the observed
failures actually are DNS-based delays, is the right guess ... and that
quite a while is around 3 minutes.
What to do about it?
First, maybe your mail
Thanks to Erich Titl K.P. for their useful suggestions.
Commenting out line 14 in /etc/init.d/dnscache (UID=1001) works fine,
dnscache ezipupdate are now working together with the bash shell.
Robert von Knobloch.
---
This SF.net email is
Does anyone know a simple way to set a couple of static dns entries on my
LEAF Bering (uClib) box?
I'm running DNSCACHE for resolving Internet names and have an MS Win2000
Domain controller as internal DNS (it needs it's own dynamic DNS for active
directory).
All this works just fine until I power
Im trying to connect several offices, and I decided to use Bering uClib
because it seems to be the most up to date branch.
After several problems with network drivers its starting to work, but
now I have to decide about security: ipsec or openvpn. It seems that
openvpn is easier to
Hello,
I use openvpn since 1 year with bering ( glibc) to connect 2 subnets through
adsl ( pppoe) lines
It's a wonderfull product. ( the easiest one to configure if both ends of
the tunnel are connected with changing extrnal addresses). I only used
static keys so far.
I'm working on building a
Hi
At 09:52 22.12.2003 +0100, you wrote:
Does anyone know a simple way to set a couple of static dns entries on my
LEAF Bering (uClib) box?
I'm running DNSCACHE for resolving Internet names and have an MS Win2000
Domain controller as internal DNS (it needs it's own dynamic DNS for active
Hello LEAF World!
My earlier mail was too hasty, another problem has emerged when using bash.
Backup of any or all package (backup... c... L...)results in each package
reporting a line number and terminated ticker.
A reboot produces simply a kernel panic and everything is completely dead.
Robert
At 14:57 22.12.2003 +0100, Robert Sabine von Knobloch wrote:
Hello LEAF World!
My earlier mail was too hasty, another problem has emerged when using bash.
Backup of any or all package (backup... c... L...)results in each package
reporting a line number and terminated ticker.
A reboot
Hi folks,
I can't get my NICs to initialize. I'm using Bering-uClibc (from
Bering-uClibc_2.0_img_bering-uclibc-1680.exe) and 3 Netgear FA310TX
(Rev-D2)cards. I've tried using both the natsemi.o tulip.o drivers by
themselves and with the pci-scan.o driver, none of which work. I would
be happy to
hi
i'm looking for isdn.lrp package for bering uClibc distribution, can
anybody help me please?
thanks
jakub urban
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up
On Mon, 2003-12-22 at 05:05, Erich Titl wrote:
Hi
At 09:52 22.12.2003 +0100, you wrote:
Does anyone know a simple way to set a couple of static dns entries on my
LEAF Bering (uClib) box?
I don't see how these entries would solve the problem you describe
below. They would help the LEAF box
hi all
does anybody have last version of zebra (0.94) or quagga (0.96.4)
compiled for bering-glibc distro?
when I try to compile this on my UML debian/slink machine, I've got
segmentation fault messages ;-( (immediately after running .\configure)
thanks
jakub urban
Craig Caughlin wrote:
Hi folks,
I can't get my NICs to initialize. I'm using Bering-uClibc (from
Bering-uClibc_2.0_img_bering-uclibc-1680.exe) and 3 Netgear FA310TX
(Rev-D2)cards. I've tried using both the natsemi.o tulip.o drivers by
themselves and with the pci-scan.o driver, none of which
Does anyone have the compiled e1000 module (version 4.3.15) for the Intel
Pro/1000 MT Dual Port nic? I believe that the 4.3.15 version of the driver
is the most recent one for 2.2 kernels.
I'm using Dachstein v1.0.2, which has version 3.0.16. Unfortunately when I
try and load the module I get
I don't have specific info for that card, but when I've had cards that have
been acting that way, it's either been that the card was conflicting with
another device, or that the module needs the io address specified.
Hope that helps somewhat.
Tony
- Original Message -
From: Miguel De
Hi there,
I have problems making a sftp/scp from my LEAF Bering 1.2 to a local
host. Connecting from a sftp client on the host to router works fine.
When connecting from router (192.168.22.1) to host (192.168.22.3) I get
the error message shown below.
firewall: -root-
# sftp 192.168.22.3
Am Montag, 22. Dezember 2003 19:12 schrieb jakub urban:
hi all
does anybody have last version of zebra (0.94) or quagga (0.96.4)
compiled for bering-glibc distro?
look for zebra.lrp (which is in fact quagga) at:
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/mod.php?mod=userpagemenu=91017page_id=51
when I
does anybody have last version of zebra (0.94) or quagga (0.96.4)
compiled for bering-glibc distro?
look for zebra.lrp (which is in fact quagga) at:
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/mod.php?mod=userpagemenu=91017page_id=51
i know this, but this is zebra.lrp for Bering-uClibc, but i looking for
Miguel De Avila wrote:
Does anyone have the compiled e1000 module (version 4.3.15) for the Intel
Pro/1000 MT Dual Port nic? I believe that the 4.3.15 version of the driver
is the most recent one for 2.2 kernels.
I'm using Dachstein v1.0.2, which has version 3.0.16. Unfortunately when I
try and
This email is just an FYI to Ray and Tom who where helping me out last week.
I was able to solve my problem from last week with traffic not being
forwarded over port 27015. You guys were correct that some traffic was
passing but only a small amount about 1 in 5 if I did my math correct. Once
I
Hi folks,
I'm trying to set up a new Bering-uClibc v 2.0 firewall, and I'm getting
an error message(s) that I think are related to dnscache (which, of
course, scroll by so quickly I can't be sure :-). How do find out which
package(s) I'm having problems with? I wrote the dmesg to a file, and
then
On Monday 22 December 2003 03:20 pm, Dalziel, Josh wrote:
the rule I had was..
DNATnet loc:192.186.1.3:27015 udp 27015
I changed the rule to..
DNATall loc:192.186.1.3:27015 udp 27015
And everything started to work.
Now look at the output of shorewall status and
On Monday 22 December 2003 05:46 pm, Craig Caughlin wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm trying to set up a new Bering-uClibc v 2.0 firewall, and I'm getting
an error message(s) that I think are related to dnscache (which, of
course, scroll by so quickly I can't be sure :-). How do find out which
package(s)
Michael,
Thanks for the response. See below...
Kory Krofft [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003:12:21:12:53:56-0500] scribed:
Snip
I now need to get Qmail up and running so I can host my own email.
I followed the qmail LEAF/LRP user's guide but I am missing
something. If I use a windows mail client to send
Ray,
See below
snipped
failures actually are DNS-based delays, is the right guess ... and
that
quite a while is around 3 minutes.
It takes about a minute and a half to get a response with telnet.
What to do about it?
First, maybe your mail server can be configured not to do reverse
Hello All,
Please be patient with me, I am new to the Linux world and I am not a
security expert.
I built a uClibc firewall version 2.0 Linux firewall kernel 2.4.20 from the
image Bering-uClibc_2.0_img_bering-uclibc-1680.exe and I have been
compromised. I have included a lot of information here
I have finally released a new WISP-Dist build 2634 with beta Atheros
support (using madwifi driver). I was waiting for madwifi to mature,
and it is finally stable under my tests (so far). On a 100 Mhz Soekris
board I'm able to get around 16 megabits/sec. I didn't test it on more
powerful
On Mon, 22 Dec 2003, Ken wrote:
Please be patient with me, I am new to the Linux world and I am not a
security expert.
Then big red flashing lights should have been going off in your head
before you posted. I'm not going to respond -- when you can provide
conslusive evidence that your
Kory Krofft [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003:12:22:20:24:44-0500] scribed:
snip /
I believe as Ray has mentioned that the major issue may be a reverse
lookup that qmail is doing which causes the timeout error on the mail
client. I am still looking into what dns settings I need to change to
fix that
Kory Krofft [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003:12:22:20:24:44-0500] scribed:
snip /
What is in these files:
/var/qmail/control/defaultdomain
kroffts.com
/var/qmail/control/locals
kroffts.com
/var/qmail/control/rcpthosts
kroffts.com
Try watching output from the following while you attempt to
At 09:47 PM 12/22/2003 -0600, Michael D Schleif wrote:
[...]
Currently, you are *NOT* authoritative and *CANNOT* assume authority for
the kroffts.com domain:
Actually, he can ... in a limited sense. In a way that matters, DNS is just
a shared delusion, and as long as he lies about it only when
Lynn,
See below
I believe as Ray has mentioned that the major issue may be a
reverse
lookup that qmail is doing which causes the timeout error on the
mail
client. I am still looking into what dns settings I need to change
to fix
that possibility.
I was assuming that all the qmail doc I've
Michael,
cat /etc/tcp.smtp gives
127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=
192.168.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=
Kory
On Mon, 22 Dec 2003 21:51:31 -0600, Michael D Schleif wrote:
Kory Krofft [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003:12:22:20:24:44-0500] scribed:
snip /
What is in these files:
/var/qmail/control/defaultdomain
I understand much better now. I will try your suggestions tomorrow and report back.
So the DMZ domain should NOT match the internet domain since the name itself ti
registered at dnsexit.
I take it then that the domain on the dmz could be kroffts.dmz as well as anything
else I could choose to
On Monday 22 December 2003 08:16 pm, Ken wrote:
Hello All,
Please be patient with me, I am new to the Linux world and I am not a
security expert.
I built a uClibc firewall version 2.0 Linux firewall kernel 2.4.20 from the
image Bering-uClibc_2.0_img_bering-uclibc-1680.exe and I have been
Ray Olszewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003:12:22:20:08:14-0800] scribed:
At 09:47 PM 12/22/2003 -0600, Michael D Schleif wrote:
[...]
Currently, you are *NOT* authoritative and *CANNOT* assume authority for
the kroffts.com domain:
Actually, he can ... in a limited sense. In a way that matters,
Kory Krofft [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003:12:22:23:30:12-0500] scribed:
I understand much better now. I will try your suggestions tomorrow and
report back.
So the DMZ domain should NOT match the internet domain since the name
itself ti registered at dnsexit.
I take it then that the domain on the
Preliminary comment: Tom is right. You've provided here nothing to indicate
that your router/firewall has been compromised, so there is no way we (or
anyone) can tell you how they did it.
Some more specific comments appear inline. I hope you consider them
patient ... you are unlikely to get
38 matches
Mail list logo
