... which pretty much describes my problem, dear all:
This maybe a typical newbie question, but I still find myself to be chewing
on it. All I did to add a new host to the Demilitarized Zone in an otherwise
stable and running Bering-Leaf configuartion was to update the NAT package
with just one
Hi everyone,
Does any one have any idea regarding the said title? I'm just
trying out the latest rtl8139too driver code from realtek on my
LEAF-based machines. I'm using my own 2.4.x kernel and I noticed
that the stock RTL driver codes are not performing satisfactorily
with my on-board RTL8100C
Hi Giovani,
-Original Message-
From: Giovanni Franza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 7:39 PM
To: Vic Berdin
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] LEAF use of M$ technology: FAT fs
Vic Berdin ha scritto:
Hi everyone,
Just a bit concerned. Look here:
Vic Berdin ha scritto:
Hi Giovani,
-Original Message-
From: Giovanni Franza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 7:39 PM
To: Vic Berdin
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] LEAF use of M$ technology: FAT fs
Vic Berdin ha scritto:
Hi everyone,
Just a bit concerned. Look
Craig Johnson wrote:
The only documentation I can point you to for the
border_router option
is the shell-script source that builds the firewall rules.
So when you use the border_router option, what is the setting for
IPFILTER_SWITCH in network.conf?
I beleive it should be set to router. Look
Hello Everyone,
Started my upgrade (sidegrade?) from Bering 1.2 to uClibc 2.0. I started to
setup dropbear but am having a problem connecting using WinScp3. I can
connect using Putty and pscp but not with WinScp3. When I launch it says
connecting, authenticating, starting the session and then
I'd like to move my Bering 1.2 to this little box. Unfortunately as far
as I can get is:
Loading Linux ... [Sorry, no I didn't count exactly how many
periods.]
Boot failed: please change disks and press a key to continue.
One thing to try is take a 1.44MB floppy, run syslinux on
K.-P. Kirchdörfer wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 28. April 2004 06:41 schrieb Tim Wegner:
I noticed that the just released Bering-uClibc 2.1.1 uses Shorewall
updated to version 1.4.10e. When I recently migrated my three
interface router from Bering to Bering-uClibc I went straight to
Shorewall 2.0.1. I had
waeos wrote:
... which pretty much describes my problem, dear all:
This maybe a typical newbie question, but I still find myself to be chewing
on it. All I did to add a new host to the Demilitarized Zone in an otherwise
stable and running Bering-Leaf configuartion was to update the NAT package
At 04:18 PM 4/28/2004 +0800, Vic Berdin wrote:
Hi everyone,
Does any one have any idea regarding the said title? I'm just
trying out the latest rtl8139too driver code from realtek on my
LEAF-based machines. I'm using my own 2.4.x kernel and I noticed
that the stock RTL driver codes are not
From: waeos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [leaf-user] Added host to DMZ; host sees anything; no one
sees host (ping)
#EXTERNAL INTERFACEINTERNAL ALL INTERFACESLOCAL
212.202.143.196etho 10.22.22.196 Yes
Shouldn't that be eth0? zero, not oh. Don't know
My posts seem to keep getting rejected by the list server. Hopefully this one
will work.
I have run into a huge problem with ipsec.lrp which is preventing an
enterprise-wide deployment of Bering 1.2 with ipsec. I believe the problem
would also exist with the uClibc distro as well, although I
At 18:16 28.04.2004, Paul G Rogers wrote:
...
I'll give it a try. I also need to check my Tom's RootBoot diskette and
see what size it is.
HP/Compaq tells me I have to go to one of their service centers for
anything like swapping the CPU with a classic Pentium, they won't tell me
what the missing
Hi
At 21:07 28.04.2004, Muiz Motani wrote:
My posts seem to keep getting rejected by the list server. Hopefully this one
will work.
I have run into a huge problem with ipsec.lrp which is preventing an
enterprise-wide deployment of Bering 1.2 with ipsec. I believe the problem
would also exist with
Thanks for the reply Eric. Consider this a push :).
Why did you opt to go with OpenSwan rather than Super FreeS/WAN? Does
OpenSwan contain all the patches that Super FreeS/WAN does
(http://www.freeswan.ca/docs/freeswan-2.05/doc/web.html#patch)?
On 28 Apr 2004 at 23:44, you wrote:
I ran into
Sorry to reply to my own post, but I think I partially answered my question by
looking at http://www.openswan.org/docs/feature_comparison.php. The only
things that I need that aren't answered by this comparison are:
1.does OpenSwan support hardware crypto acceleration? I know there
is a patch
Hi
At 23:49 28.04.2004, Muiz Motani wrote:
Thanks for the reply Eric. Consider this a push :).
Why did you opt to go with OpenSwan rather than Super FreeS/WAN? Does
OpenSwan contain all the patches that Super FreeS/WAN does
(http://www.freeswan.ca/docs/freeswan-2.05/doc/web.html#patch)?
Super
At 00:04 29.04.2004, Muiz Motani wrote:
Sorry to reply to my own post, but I think I partially answered my
question by
looking at http://www.openswan.org/docs/feature_comparison.php. The only
things that I need that aren't answered by this comparison are:
1.does OpenSwan support hardware crypto
AL, you need to tell WinScp3 what shell to use. In Environment/SCP
under Shell click the Enter radio button and enter /bin/sh in the edit
box. That will fix that.
You may get some other errors about Groups when you try to connect but
just click ok and it should be fine. Mine is!
HTH
KP asked (referring to the 2.X version of shorewall in my Bering-
uClibc setup):
Sounds good; how big is shorwall.lrp?
My configured three interface Shorewall 2.x version is 83563 bytes .
That is 15000 or so bytes bigger than my 1.4X version. As I said the
upgrade was painless. My Bering
G'day folks.
I am having some difficulty getting a pptp VPN running on my LEAF box.
I seem to be able to connect locally but not remotely. I can see my
remote connection request coming in to my router (I've turned logging
on) but the connection is not made.
Do I need to install conntrack
David Pitts wrote:
G'day folks.
I am having some difficulty getting a pptp VPN running on my LEAF box.
I seem to be able to connect locally but not remotely. I can see my
remote connection request coming in to my router (I've turned logging
on) but the connection is not made.
Do I need to
I apologise unreservedly for that but I certainly didn't mean to do it
and I usually start a new thread with a new subject.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Eastep [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 29 April 2004 12:27 PM
To: David Pitts
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [leaf-user]
David Pitts wrote:
I apologise unreservedly for that but I certainly didn't mean to do it
and I usually start a new thread with a new subject.
And I apologize for being so grumpy -- time to go to bed
-Tom
--
Tom Eastep\ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool
Shoreline,
Dear All
Is there any clue/docs/url about handling whatever input received through
serial-com-port (tty ?)
I need to monitor the usage of PBX.
It'll be great if there is example on using BASH to monitor tty.
Sincerely
-bino-
---
This SF.Net
25 matches
Mail list logo
