Re: [leaf-user] dhcp (pump) fails or acquire address after network (cable) outage

2005-03-06 Thread Gene Smith
Jon Clausen wrote, On 02/13/2005 03:27 AM: On Sat, 12 Feb, 2005 at 18:00:05 -0500, Gene Smith wrote: I am running a bering-leaf system with 2.4.18 kernel that I setup about two years ago (not sure of exact version). It has been working fine except for one problem. When the cable goes down

Re: [leaf-user] dhcp (pump) fails or acquire address after network (cable) outage

2005-02-13 Thread Gene Smith
Jon Clausen wrote, On 02/13/2005 03:27 AM: On Sat, 12 Feb, 2005 at 18:00:05 -0500, Gene Smith wrote: I am running a bering-leaf system with 2.4.18 kernel that I setup about two years ago (not sure of exact version). It has been working fine except for one problem. When the cable goes down

Re: [leaf-user] DNS problems?

2005-02-13 Thread Gene Smith
Craig Caughlin wrote, On 02/13/2005 05:22 PM: Hi folks, I'm not sure if this is related to my other hiccups, but I don't think so. My problem is that I don't seem to be able to resolve DNS names. I can connect to web sites if I know their IP address, but I can't ping anyone via FQDN either from my

[leaf-user] dhcp (pump) fails or acquire address after network (cable) outage

2005-02-12 Thread Gene Smith
I am running a bering-leaf system with 2.4.18 kernel that I setup about two years ago (not sure of exact version). It has been working fine except for one problem. When the cable goes down and eventually comes back up the bering-leaf system never recovers (clients can't access internet). I

Re: [leaf-user] dhcp (pump) fails or acquire address after network (cable) outage

2005-02-12 Thread Gene Smith
Tom Eastep wrote, On 02/12/2005 06:04 PM: Gene Smith wrote: I am running a bering-leaf system with 2.4.18 kernel that I setup about two years ago (not sure of exact version). It has been working fine except for one problem. When the cable goes down and eventually comes back up the bering-leaf

[leaf-user] wrt54g (wireless router) between leaf box and lan

2004-12-05 Thread Gene Smith
I have placed a wireless linksys wrt54g router between my bering leaf box and my local network. The ethernet network between leaf and wrt54g I have assigned to network 192.168.10.x and the local network is 192.169.1.x, From the local network (some hosts directly wired to wrt54g eth switch and

Re: [leaf-user] wrt54g (wireless router) between leaf box and lan (solved)

2004-12-05 Thread Gene Smith
Gene Smith wrote, On 12/05/2004 04:40 PM: I have placed a wireless linksys wrt54g router between my bering leaf box and my local network. The ethernet network between leaf and wrt54g I have assigned to network 192.168.10.x and the local network is 192.169.1.x, From the local network (some

Re: [leaf-user] wrt54g (wireless router) between leaf box and lan

2004-12-05 Thread Gene Smith
Ray Olszewski wrote, On 12/05/2004 09:24 PM: Sorry to be dropping into this late; I missed the original posting. At 02:47 AM 12/6/2004 +0100, Arne Bernin wrote: On Sun, 2004-12-05 at 22:40, Gene Smith wrote: I have placed a wireless linksys wrt54g router between my bering leaf box and my local

[leaf-user] ipv6 with bering-leaf and dnscache

2004-04-11 Thread Gene Smith
As indicated by the ipv6 thread visible here, http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.testers/4537 default fedora core 2 is using ipv6 records to do dns queries. The main person in this thread, Randy Schrickel, was using a d-link router and had to upgrade it for it work right with

Re: [leaf-user] Send-only qmail

2004-01-05 Thread Gene Smith
Shed. wrote: Gene Smith wrote: Yes, but that is not really my question. Let me rephrase: Here is my typical df output again. Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/root 6144 5196 948 85% / tmpfs1525616

Re: [leaf-user] Send-only qmail

2004-01-04 Thread Gene Smith
Shed. wrote: Gene Smith wrote: Here is the current df: Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/root 6144 5196 948 85% / tmpfs1525616 15240 0% /tmp tmpfs 2048 1056 992 52

Re: [leaf-user] Send-only qmail

2004-01-04 Thread Gene Smith
the size of the /dev/root filesystem. Default= 6M -gene - Alex Shed. Gene Smith wrote: Shed. wrote: Gene Smith wrote: Here is the current df: Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/root 6144 5196 948 85% / tmpfs15256

Re: [leaf-user] Send-only qmail

2004-01-03 Thread Gene Smith
Ray Olszewski wrote: At 02:18 AM 12/31/2003 -0500, Gene Smith wrote: Presently my users behind my bering-leaf f/w send mail using mozilla via my ISP's smtp server. However, this server is sometime down for short periods and connection cannot be made. In that case, the user either retries the send

Re: [leaf-user] Send-only qmail

2004-01-03 Thread Gene Smith
Ray Olszewski wrote: At 01:52 AM 1/3/2004 -0500, Gene Smith wrote: [old stuff deleted] Thanks for the info. Yes, I am NAT'ing behind the f/w. I was sort of able to get qmail working but it uses a lot more of my ramdisk (only have 32Meg Ram) than I hoped. Numbers would make this easier

Re: [leaf-user] Send-only qmail

2004-01-03 Thread Gene Smith
Ray Olszewski wrote: At 03:24 AM 1/3/2004 -0500, Gene Smith wrote: [...] Here is the reject messages I see often in /var/log/syslog: Jan 2 23:23:07 firewall kernel: Shorewall:all2all:REJECT:IN= OUT=eth1 SRC=66.168.89.166 DST=209.225.8.77 LEN=60 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=12320 PROTO=TCP SPT

Re: [leaf-user] Send-only qmail

2004-01-03 Thread Gene Smith
Gene Smith wrote: With the outgoing smtp rule removed from shorewall, I should be able to find where qmail queues the messages and see what is being sent to mydomain.com. The email being automatically sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] contain just one line in the body: multicron-p Multicron-p runs

Re: [leaf-user] Send-only qmail

2004-01-03 Thread Gene Smith
Gene Smith wrote: Gene Smith wrote: With the outgoing smtp rule removed from shorewall, I should be able to find where qmail queues the messages and see what is being sent to mydomain.com. The email being automatically sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] contain just one line in the body: multicron-p

[leaf-user] Send-only qmail

2003-12-31 Thread Gene Smith
Presently my users behind my bering-leaf f/w send mail using mozilla via my ISP's smtp server. However, this server is sometime down for short periods and connection cannot be made. In that case, the user either retries the send later or saves the message as a draft and tries to send it later.

Re: [leaf-user] Boot Bering from floppy, most Pkgs on CD

2003-12-30 Thread Gene Smith
Charles Steinkuehler wrote: Gene Smith wrote: I am attempting to run Bering from a non-bootable CD which requires booting from floppy. I am presently running fine for over a year from two floppies but would like to have more packages than will fit on my two floppies. Is there explicit

Re: [leaf-user] upgrade sshd w/o reboot ?

2003-10-12 Thread Gene Smith
Dave Hunt wrote: Strange, able to install latest sshd in running system ok using lrpkg -i sshd.lrp w/o reboot and it used new sshd version for new connections. Also copied latest sshd.lrp to boot floppy. When reboot occurred (due to power outage) could not do ssh connection (connection RST

Re: [leaf-user] upgrade sshd w/o reboot ?

2003-10-11 Thread Gene Smith
Eric Spakman wrote: Gene, I want to upgrade to the latest sshd without rebooting my system. I have copied the latest sshd.lrp to my boot floppy and mounted it on the bering-leaf system. After I stop sshd, is it possible to unpack the sshd.lrp on the floppy into /usr/sbin/ and overwrite sshd on

[leaf-user] upgrade sshd w/o reboot ?

2003-10-08 Thread Gene Smith
I want to upgrade to the latest sshd without rebooting my system. I have copied the latest sshd.lrp to my boot floppy and mounted it on the bering-leaf system. After I stop sshd, is it possible to unpack the sshd.lrp on the floppy into /usr/sbin/ and overwrite sshd on the ram disk? I can then

Re: [leaf-user] upgrade sshd w/o reboot ?

2003-10-08 Thread Gene Smith
Alex Rhomberg wrote: Will sshd connection be maintained during the sshd stop/start like when Shorewall is restarted? I would suspect that restarting sshd would cause any existing ssh connections to be dropped, right? I'm not sure about that, but I suspect the connection will be dropped with a sshd

Re: [leaf-user] Bad Bering natsemi.o driver?

2003-01-09 Thread Gene Smith
Craig Caughlin wrote: Hi folks, I'm preparing a new box with the latest, stable Bering and I'm wondering if the driver might be bad? I downloaded the natsemi.o driver for the Netgear FA311 NICs I have from http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bering/latest/modules/2.4.20/net /, and when I use

Re: [leaf-user] Win2K DNS Problem

2003-01-04 Thread Gene Smith
Brad Fritz wrote: On Sat, 04 Jan 2003 11:58:26 EST Kory Krofft wrote: Brad: Output from tcpdump as well as an Ethereal dump are at: http:home.woh.rr.com/kkrofft/etherealout http:home.woh.rr.com/kkrofft/tcpdump.txt FYI: I see the tcpdump.txt but not etherealout when I click.

Re: [leaf-user] Bering /dev/fd0u1760 ???

2003-01-01 Thread Gene Smith
Jacques Nilo wrote: Le Mardi 31 Décembre 2002 07:09, Gene Smith a écrit : I need just a bit more room on my 1680k floppy. Is it possible to build a Bering 1.0 image for a 1760k floppy? Would it work in a typical fd drive? The developer guide seems to produce an output file called linux.upx

Re: [leaf-user] Bering /dev/fd0u1760 ???

2003-01-01 Thread Gene Smith
Jeff Newmiller wrote: On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, Gene Smith wrote: Jacques Nilo wrote: Le Mardi 31 Décembre 2002 07:09, Gene Smith a écrit : I need just a bit more room on my 1680k floppy. Is it possible to build a Bering 1.0 image for a 1760k floppy? Would it work in a typical fd drive

[leaf-user] Bering /dev/fd0u1760 ???

2002-12-30 Thread Gene Smith
I need just a bit more room on my 1680k floppy. Is it possible to build a Bering 1.0 image for a 1760k floppy? Would it work in a typical fd drive? The developer guide seems to produce an output file called linux.upx. It sort of implies it is a disk image (size 1680k?). How do you produce a