Paul Rogers wrote:
Please, can you give me pointers to hardware vendors or projects
with such especifications.
How about any old PC you've got? LEAF doesn't put a heavy load
on a system. Any old PC from 486 on up that you can fit whatever
NIC's you have lying around and can get ~32MB of
Tony wrote:
This may be prudent, but it may not be reality. If you were worried
about resiliency, would you be using old or repurposed hardware to begin
with?
I agree that CF's or USB sticks are a better choice, but the user base
seems to be indicating that the floppy isn't dead yet.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lets make a poll to find out how many of us are booting bering from a
floppy and decide from there.
I still favor use Bering 1.2 floppies. I like the security of the
write-protect slider. And part of the idea about Linux, and Bering firewalls
in particular, is
Andrew Gray (Gil) wrote:
Why not just use the MAC Address and have dhcp always assign that machine the
same address. That way all other settings from dhcp will be applied to the
machine every time and changes to the settings applied by dhcp will also be
picked up by that machine. This
Tom Eastep wrote:
On Thursday 01 December 2005 10:59, Jim Ford wrote:
I inserted the following line in my shorewall rules file:
DNATnetloc:192.168.1.1-192.168.1.64tcp6881:6888 -
all
Hoping to solve a NAT problem with my Arureus bittorrent client. I gave the
IP
Tom Eastep wrote:
On Wednesday 30 November 2005 10:09, Jim Ford wrote:
Now I'm all snug and cosy behind my Leaf Bering firewall (thanks to the
helpful folk on this forum), I'd like to see just how secure it appears
from the outside. There are various sites, some of them commercial, that
Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Eric Spakman wrote:
| Hello Jim,
|
On your windows box, try the following at a prompt:
Or, if you really want your windows box to get a consistent IP, just
add a
stanza for it in the dhcpd config file:
~host
Ron Senykoff wrote:
We are now launching a new product (open source - free - GPL) called
QBox. Qbox is a plug and play network appliance for traffic shaping
and uses LEAF as its build and (for now) the PC Engines WRAP board as
the hardware.
If anyone would like to check out the website and
Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
Andrew Nance wrote:
| It is hard to estimate but somewhere around 750 Kbps to 1.5 Mbps total
| bandwidth.
Almost anything fairly modern (ie: Pentium-class PCI based system)
should be
able to handle this kind of bandwidth. Even 486 based systems with EISA
cards
K.-P. Kirchdörfer wrote:
The Bering-uClibc team releases Bering-uClibc 2.2.3 today...
When is the webconf package going to be officially released?
It has been on Beta stage since last year.
-M
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW --
Hi,
I have a Bering-uClibc (V2.2.2) installed between me and the internet
and everything is fine.
but
I have been requested to provide MSN Messenger connection to couple of
machines with the same firewall protection but not my subnet. The
problem that we are now facing is this.
It seems
Nathan Angelacos wrote:
Beta 3 of webconf.lrp for Bering-uClibc is now available. This version splits
out the weblet functions from extra plugins.
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/leaf/devel/nangel/webconf/lrp/webconf.lrp
contains only weblet-like monitoring functions, plus tools to back
There is a minor problem in using these two tools at the same firewall.
Logging in weblet is unable to draw summaries Pretty Shorewal Logs if
I delete logs from webconf side.
This seems to be due to...deleting the log-file.Some other functions are
also miss behaving because of this.
Is there a
Victor McAllister wrote:
Marko Nurmenniemi wrote:
-M
not sure why you delete the logs but what about just
cd /var/log
logfile
That should make logfile an empty file
I'm making trials (running port scans etc.) and logs are filling all of
my 20MB memory (only ~2MB to logs).
So I deleted
Héctor Hoshi wrote:
Esteemed friends:
I am trying to configure 2 ne isa cards with 0x300,5
and 0x320,11 like io,irq.
No matter I do I did not get up those interfaces.
I am configuring bering uclibc 2.2 with an adsl modem
conection through eth0.
Any idea about how to isolate the trouble then
Maybe related to one post earlier but since I'm not sure.
Something broke weblet after the first access. I'm using Mozilla
Firefox browsers and weblet (main page at 192.168.1.254) was fine when
used for the first time. Second time all I get is html (but mozilla will
not display a page from
Martin Hejl wrote:
Hi Marko,
Marko Nurmenniemi wrote:
Something broke weblet after the first access
You're right - what happened was that /etc/sh-httpd.mime was missing
in sh-httpd.conf, which would explain the issues you're seeing.
There's an updated version of sh-httpd.lrp in CVS
Andrew Gray wrote:
Hello all,
Just a quick query to ask if anyone has connected to ADSL using an
RFC1483 Bridged llc connection. I have been investigating possible
suppliers of ADSL and one which seems to show promise tells me their
connection is of this type as opposed to a PPPOE connection.
K.-P. Kirchdörfer wrote:
Due to new linuxrc backupdisk is broken and has been removed.
With scp and dd support it shouldn't be a problem though - will anyone miss
this feature?
I will miss it.
Keep it simple for the common people.
Menu option needs no learning and floppies do break from
I have Bering-uClibc 2.1 setup in a 486/66 with 16MB.
With two ISA (SMC 8216C) 10M cards I have a TESTED ~7M/s download speed
from a company internal FTP server. With 100M connection I was able to
download (without the FW in the middle) 20M/s. Both tests were done in a
ethernet network without
Arnold Wiegert wrote:
Hi,
two of my sons, one at home with his machine behind a Dachstein
firewall, the other on the other side of the firewall, somewhere on
the net, want to play a role playing game over the internet.
I've run the firewall for some time, but am still a newbie in many
Tim Wegner wrote:
Ah so, the solution is to load the crc32 module before the 8390
module. This is probably a FAQ that I missed, but if not, this would
be a good thing to add to the installation docs since it's a
difference from Bering,
It's not in the FAQ. but it is in the dependencies
What does it require to be able to reset the logs to zero from weblet?
What kind of scripting is needed?
The purpose would be to enable the user to erase the logs after they are
seen.
I'm using std. Bering-uClibc 2.1 rc2 (but will soon move to
Bering-uClibc 2.1)
-Marko
Hi,
In Firewall Status windows at
http://192.168.1.254/cgi-bin/checkfw?verbose
There is a typo on the last text line which says
Or check the hits sorted by port or by IP adress I believe the correct
spelling is address?
-M
---
The SF.Net
Hi,
I had a freeze on the system ten minutes ago and found this on the
logs...firewall and the connection was OK after a minute or so. No
booting or any other measures needed.
My connection is blasted with some traffic, there are 1623 denied or
rejected packets in logs and FW has been up
K.-P. Kirchdörfer wrote:
Today, January 15th 2004, the Bering-uClibc team releases
Bering-uClibc 2.1-rc1
As usual it can be downloaded from the FRS area:
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=13751package_id=67534
I downloaded the image and modules with Netscape 7.1 and noticed
Is anyone else seeing the Weblet problem I'm having with the cgi not
finding the scripts?
I'm getting 404 Not Found, File not found: /cgi-bin/add_any_query_here
on scripts that are trying to access firewall statistic on the RC 3 Bering.
The statuslights are also not shown in the 192.168.1.254
27 matches
Mail list logo
