On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 16:35 +, Jim Ford wrote:
I posted this earlier last year, but never got any responses. I'd still
like to get Leaf running on an old laptop, so I don't have the desktop
Leaf roaring away under the desk!
I'm trying to get a laptop running with 3.1-beta1. I've got a
Since nobody has answered this...
On Sat, 2007-05-19 at 13:11 -0700, Brent Gardner wrote:
I want to set up an authoritative DNS server that listens on both UDP
and TCP for one of my domains. I'm using tinydns with dnscache and
daemontools on Bering uClibc v3.0.2. I've got it working
On Tue, 2004-07-20 at 10:58, Thomas Wille wrote:
Dear Richard,
Thanks for the quick answer.
I got the following results:
ttyS00 at 0x03f8 (irq = 4) is a 16550A
ttyS01 at 0x02f8 (irq = 3) is a 16550A
It is correct, isn't it? Anyway, all my other linux boxes have the same
output. I
On Thu, 2004-07-08 at 14:44, Frank Dauer wrote:
Hello!
Is there any preferred/default way to work with iptables rules?
As far as I can see there's no rc script to set up rules
automatically if I don't use shorewall. And I don't want to
use shorewall on every single leaf-router when I just
On Thu, 2004-06-10 at 12:01, Victor McAllister wrote:
I have been running Bering 1.2 without a reboot for 270 days - had to
take it down for network changes so decided to try uClibc 2.2.0_b3
I have two internal networks - both of which are served by dhcpd
I am trying to get dhcpd running
On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 18:16, Tony wrote:
I have a few questions regarding this...
Now, if I have this figured correctly, the bridge is transparent to your
ISP, so you would need another host behind the bridge to have an
address, correct? The use I have in mind would be statically
] tinylogin
From: Richard Doyle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 13:32:47 -0800
On Thu, 2004-03-11 at 09:21, Brian Fisher wrote:
Hi all,
I realize this question is beyond the scope of what LEAF is designed
for
and is a major security risk but any help
On Thu, 2004-03-11 at 09:21, Brian Fisher wrote:
Hi all,
I realize this question is beyond the scope of what LEAF is designed for
and is a major security risk but any help would be greatly appreciated.
I login into my bering firewall via ssh and use ping, dig traceroute etc. I
Try
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bering/1.0-stable/development/kernel/2.4.18/Bering_1.0-stable.config
-Richard
On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 06:26, Henning Jebsen wrote:
Hi folks,
I would like to compile my own kernel (2.4.18) for
my Bering 1.0 stable glibc-based Box.
It would be nice
If memeory serves, you may need to load the serial.o module; setserial
is not needed in for most configurations.
-Richard
On Sun, 2004-02-22 at 05:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been very happy using the Dachstein-CD. I have configured 1
for broadband, and also 1 for dialup with an
On Sun, 2004-02-01 at 12:08, joah moat wrote:
There is no /lib/modules/2.4.24/kernel/drivers/net/ directory, do I need to
create a directory for this 8390.o module?
Module.dep file included with Bering-uClibc 2.1:
/lib/modules/2.4.24/pcmcia/pcnet_cs.o:
I believe your pcnet_cs.o module depends on 8390.o module. Always check
the modules.dep file for your LEAF distro.
-Richard
On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 18:55, joah moat wrote:
I have installed Bering-uClibc 2.1 on my P90 notebook with PCMCIA.lrp for:
3Com 3C589D
D-Link DFE-670TXD
I have placed
On Thu, 2004-01-22 at 12:37, Jeff Newmiller wrote:
snip
Short answer: no.
Long answer: dhcpd doesn't actively share information with dns. By fixing
the ip address, you obtain a common reference you can put in tinydns,
BIND, or whatever other dns service you happen to run.
I'm not sure
On Wed, 2004-01-14 at 11:01, Timothy J. Massey wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 01/14/2004 01:23:48 PM:
At 10:43 AM 1/14/2004 -0500, Timothy J. Massey wrote:
[...]
If you want more details than this ... for example, if you want
the actual
URLs logged, not just the IP
On Wed, 2004-01-14 at 13:01, Tom Eastep wrote:
On Wednesday 14 January 2004 12:47 pm, Richard Doyle wrote:
guess there isn't such a system...
Tim Massey
Transparent proxying is implemented by configuring iptables/netfilter to
redirect packets to the squid server. The Squid logs
On Mon, 2003-12-22 at 05:05, Erich Titl wrote:
Hi
At 09:52 22.12.2003 +0100, you wrote:
Does anyone know a simple way to set a couple of static dns entries on my
LEAF Bering (uClib) box?
I don't see how these entries would solve the problem you describe
below. They would help the LEAF box
On Mon, 2003-11-17 at 09:35, Paul G Rogers wrote:
Too bad, there's another issue I noticed with pppd. I haven't checked in
v1.2 yet, and I don't know if this is the right place to report it, but I
did notice another issue with pppd: it didn't always terminate the link
after the idle period
Please follow How do I request help at
http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=1891group_id=13751
On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 22:55, Paul G Rogers wrote:
I'm trying to customize Bering 1.2 to replace a 1.0 dialup firewall I've
been using. I've put both on side-by-side computers and been
On Thu, 2003-09-25 at 21:37, Mark Bynum wrote:
All,
It shouldn't be this hard. All I'm trying to do is route between my two
internal networks of 192.168.1.0 and 192.168.2.0. Here is what I have:
INTERN_NET=192.168.1.0/24 192.168.2.0/24
eth1_ROUTES=192.168.2.0/24_via_192.168.2.254
On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 06:39, Julian Church wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 15:09:46 +0200 (CEST), Alexander Borghgraef
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to get Bering 1.2 with the 2.4.20 kernel to work. I have
a D-link D nic which is supposed to work with the via-rhine driver.
On Sun, 2003-07-13 at 11:29, RS Peterson wrote:
Ray -- Thanks for your kind, helpful reply. I hope all this info is helpful.
Questions/responses -- embedded
On Saturday 12 July 2003 10:10 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Message: 2
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2003 13:14:23 -0700
To: [EMAIL
On Tue, 2003-07-01 at 05:36, Nicolas Riendeau wrote:
Sorry, I forgot to mention that I'm talking about the ones for the
Broadcom chips (Homepna 2.0?).
A quick google would have led you to
http://www.homepna.org/support/faqs.asp#FAQ6, which provides directions
for compiling the il.o modules used
On Mon, 2003-06-09 at 19:19, Greg Playle wrote:
My thanks to Tom Eastep and Ray Olszewski, who pointed out some information
that would help.
I'm working on LEAF Bering 1.2, using a PPP serial modem (as ppp0) and a
PCMCIA NIC as eth0 for the internal network. The host is a Toshiba
Please reply to the list.
On Mon, 2003-06-09 at 20:49, Greg Playle wrote:
I guess I'm a bit puzzled at this. The messages at boot appear to indicate
that insmod is throwing unresolved symbol errors when it tries to load
3c589_cs. The things it's trying to refer to appear to be the modules
leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
--
Richard Doyle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This sf.net email
/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
--
Richard Doyle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and
disoriented
On Wed, 2003-02-26 at 19:18, Greg Playle wrote:
On 19 Feb 2003 13:11:07 -0800, Richard Doyle wrote in reply:
--- snip ---
Post a log segment showing a complete sequence of chat and pppd entries.
In general it is helpful to post unedited logs (but replace passwords
leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
--
Richard Doyle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This SF.net email is sponsored
leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
--
Richard Doyle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This SF.net email is sponsored
: Richard Doyle [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, 17 February, 2003 22:18
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Testing dial-up modem
Check your logs. pppd should let daemon.info know when the serial
connection is established. Should also show up
As far as I know, all LEAF variants use version 2.0pl5 of the ISC dhcp
implementation, including the relay and server. The current (3.0)
versions of these programs are significantly larger. The security
advisory applies to the 3.0 versions, but the 2.0 versions are obsolete
and unmaintained.
In
Brad Fritz has already pointed you to
http://leaf-project.org/pub/packages-list.html
n Fri, 2003-01-17 at 11:51, Samuel Abreu wrote:
Hi, i get Bering stable and the binary dhcrelay don't exist in the distro,
or in dhcpd.lrp, so, u can say me what package i find dhcrelay??? Thanks
On Fri, 2003-01-17 at 11:55, Brad Fritz wrote:
snip
There is also a dhcpreli.lrp package in
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bering/latest/contrib/
that appears to be v0.3.1 of:
http://www.strongsec.com/freeswan/dhcprelay/
$ tar -xzf /tmp/dhcpreli.lrp -O
the blankl line, which apparently confused klogd. The standard
Debian hostname command works properly, returning the expected string.
-Richard
On Fri, 2002-12-13 at 19:04, Jeff Newmiller wrote:
On 13 Dec 2002, Richard Doyle wrote:
Using Bering 1.0 stable, there is a long pause during startup
Using Bering 1.0 stable, there is a long pause during startup while the
system log daemon starts.
I see:
Starting system log daemon: syslogd
then a pause for a minute or more, after which klogd is appended to the
line above, and startup proceeds normally.
I'm using the stock 1680 image with
On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 04:32, Matthew Pozzi wrote:
Could someone please help me here, I have upgraded to Dachstein v1.02 and
would like to run pppd for a dialin service.
However I have the following message coming back at me when I try to run
# /usr/sbin/pppd
ioctl(TIOCSETD(PPP)): Invalid
On Wed, 2002-10-23 at 13:06, Kevin wrote:
I have a fully working network using DHCP, Dachstein 1.02 two floppy
version.
Work just gave me a laptop with WinXP installed. In the documents, I see
where you can have two ip stacks and WinXP will use the correct stack.
Well, sort of. Your mail
On Thu, 2002-10-10 at 07:18, Jon Clausen wrote:
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 02:28:33PM +0200, Elmar Gerwalin wrote:
Hello,
I'm looking for lrp packages that contain rshd and/or telnetd.
The configuration is described somewhere, but I can find no binaries for my
bering box.
CMIIW but
On Wed, 2002-09-18 at 09:23, Brad Fritz wrote:
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002 09:42:13 EST you wrote:
Hello!
I can't seem to find which LAN module I should use with this chipset. Could
someone please point out the correct module?
Is that an ethernet controller chipset number? I thought it
On Tue, 2002-07-09 at 09:56, Troy Aden wrote:
I am running dhrelay. So it is getting hit with quite a few lease requests
being forwarded to our DHCP servers. About once a week when our leases get
renewed I get the following error. Eth1 : Too much work during interrupt.
Csr5=0xF0630040. (This
On Mon, 2002-07-08 at 11:39, Ray Olszewski wrote:
I sent the prior reply you quote below. The reasons I said it depends is
because it does. There is no single *right* answer to the follow-up
question you ask. What is best for you depends on a detailed view of the
network that the Dachstein
On Thu, 2002-07-04 at 10:06, Jeff wrote:
I am running eigerstein 3.1.0 and wish to be able to telnet in to from
my local (192.168.2.x) network. I installed /usr/sbin/in.telnetd and
uncommented it in /etc/services. I added:
in.telnetd: 192.168.2.0/255.255.255.0
to hosts.allow
I get
On Thu, 2002-06-06 at 15:35, Nachman Yaakov Ziskind wrote:
Omar D. Samuels wrote (on Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 05:09:49PM -0500):
| What do you mean, I still don't understand.
|
| | One learns something new everyday... does PAT stand for Private Address
| | Translation?
|
| NAT = Network
I suspect you can, but you are most likely to get knowledgeable help on
the LARTC list: http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc
-Richard
On Tue, 2002-06-04 at 11:13, Kim Oppalfens wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to do some traffic shaping and it appears to be working.
Just have one
I suspect the startup script in the dhcrelay package you used calls the
route command (I have no idea why it would do this), but your distro
doesn't provide route.
I don't call route or ip in my dhcrelay startup script, so I can't tell
you how to fix it (if that is your problem), but look for a
This was a problem with old kernels (2.1 and earlier), and should not a
affect you. See
http://www.isc.org/products/DHCP/dhcpv3-README.html#linux4
-Richard
On Fri, 2002-05-24 at 14:56, Troy Aden wrote:
I did some digging and came up with this little nugget that has me
more confused
Hmm, the package in CVS seems to contain dhcpd not dhcrelay.
-Richard
On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 09:51, Mike Noyes wrote:
On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 09:23, Richard Doyle wrote:
If you like, I can send you a copy of the dhcrelay.lrp I used to use
with an LRP 2.9.8 firewall, which should work on any
Check http://www.homepna.org/support/faqs.html#FAQ6
This must be fairly new.
-Richard
On Wed, 2002-05-22 at 06:11, steve crowl wrote:
From http://www.digit-life.com/articles/homepna2/ publication date unknown:
Unfortunately, since Broadcom hasn't released the official specification of
its
I can't see anything in the snipped output to suggest your firewall is
blocking port 25, but a quick check on Google suggests that Verizon DOES
block port 25. It might be worthwhile to dig a bit deeper.
-Richard
On Wed, 2002-05-22 at 09:50, Jim Van Eeckhoutte wrote:
i cannot telnet out via
dhcrelay is your friend. See
ftp://ftp.isc.org/isc/dhcp/dhcp-2.0pl5.tar.gz
(version 3 is much bigger).
-Richard
On Wed, 2002-05-22 at 17:34, Troy Aden wrote:
Hi I am working with Dachstein in a basic router setup. I would like
to know how to set up DHCP request forwarding between
Well, /usr/src/linux/net/ipv4/route.c implements the rules, but won't help
tell you what is generating the martians. For that, don't you need a packet
sniffer like tcpdump?
-Richard
On Thursday 02 May 2002 05:16 am, Sergio Morilla wrote:
Thanks, but no.
I have identified the offending
DHCPD v.3 provides dynamic DNS services. Unfortunately, tinydns does not support this,
but BIND (versions 8 and 9) does. Consider running DHCPD v.3 and BIND on an internal
server, behind your firewall. I've run DHCPD, BIND and dnscache together at two sites
for more than a year with no
As for the 864K vs 294K, v3 vs v2 dhcp source package sizes -
that would
sure be a material reason why it wasn't in leaf. However it's worth
clarifying those numbers a bit (damned lies statistics :)
In order to discern that the existence of the release
functionality in
fact was not
On Mon, 2002-03-25 at 21:11, Richard Doyle wrote:
Run telnet over a secure zebedee tunnel between the
internal box and the
firewall. It is much smaller than any current sshd tunnel
(my zebedee +
telnetd package weighs 66896 bytes, compiled under uClibc).
That's cool. Is there an lrp
On Mon, 2002-03-25 at 13:02, Jacques Nilo wrote:
Has anyone managed to make a 1.68M Bering floppy image
with SSH and
TinyDNS? This was possible under Eigerstein.
It will be very hard.
sshd.lrp is about 312K
snip
Thanks. Unfortunately most of my routers are only accessible
via
If you don't absolutely have to use ssh, consider zebedee. A tunnel.lrp
with zebedee and an (archaic) telnetd masses just 66702 bytes (compiled
with uClibc, so glibc versions might be larger).
-Richard
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
snip
The ipup package is in my opinion to old for 2.4.xx
and iproute based systems
Well I do not know what you mean by too old. It is the
latest sid debian version and I adapted it to replace
the ifconfig/route commands by the ip addr/ip route combo.
snip
Jacques
Would you
I haven't used the bwidth22.lrp package, but am playing around with HTB
queuing (which requires kernel and iproute2 patches). If you are
willing to try a 2.4 kernel, you should consider the Bering
distribution. It includes Shorewall, which has some support for traffic
control
Ugh. Console messages about martians almost always tell you there is
something seriously wrong with your network. Turning them off is like
disconnecting a burglar alarm. In your case, these messages indicate
that an unguarded (?) backdoor to your network is currently open.
This will disable
FWIW, a quick check on google for securemote linux nat turned up
http://www.phoneboy.com/faq/0372.html and
http://www.phoneboy.com/faq/0141.html.
-Richard
Got my ip aliasing/forwarding and all working on dachstein.
Very happy
about that. Great piece of work!
Now for an interesting
Well, in the first case the source is bizarre, and suspicious; in the
second, the destination is bizarre. I'm not sure what would happen if
both source and destination were bizarre: maybe two messages. In any
case, these messages are pretty well documented in the kernel source, if
I recall
I have a dhcrelay package that should work under Dachstein, if Koon
Wong's does not. Let me know if you need it and I'll send it to you.
-Richard
Hi Reginald, hi all
There is a dhcrelay.lrp package on Koon Wong's package
archive. But Koon
Wong's archive seems to be offline. But Rick is
I need to setup a firewall for my office. There is already a
router/gateway box
but we dont have access to it in order to put a firewall on.
I would like to
use a LEAF box as a firewall directly behind the router. Is
You should provide lots more information about your existing setup. I'll
I'm a little confused about how to set up the network.conf to
work with
diald and ppp. Diald sets up a proxy interface called 'sl0'
to monitor for
network traffic. This is the default route until diald
starts up ppp. Then
the default route switches to 'ppp0'.
My question is how does
Why do you need diald? Recent versions of pppd support dial-on-demand.
If my experience is any guide, get pppd working, then try diald if
needed.
-Richard
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Mark Lubratt
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002
I want dial-on-demand during non-business hours, but I also
want the link
always up during business hours. I understand that pppd can now do on
demand dialing, but will it also do a scheduled link? With
diald I can
force the link up in the morning during the week and then let
it go back
You might want to check the dhcp server mailing list:
http://www.isc.org/services/public/lists/dhcp-lists.html.
Dhcpd 3 lets you define arbitrary options, but I don't know whether that
will suffice.
AFAIK dhcpd 3 has not been lrp'd; it is much bigger than dhcpd 2.
-Richard
Microsofts new dhcp
to test this. Also important to determine: does the
dhcpd, as packaged in
LRP support the full command set?
I'll take a look at this, and report back what I find.
Dan
Quoting Richard Doyle [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
You might want to check the dhcp server mailing list:
http://www.isc.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you ping various IP Addresses accross the link? Can
you connect to systems with \\ip.ad.dre.ss\c$ and get a
username/password prompt? If not, then look at routing. If
so, then it becomes a WINs/lmhosts issue.
Currently, on one end I am using an NT4 server
Well, I'm not sure why you think port 1024 is netarx (their docos refer
to port 1040), but port 1024 is the lowest dynamic port in most (?)
linux systems. Somewhat more interesting is destination port 514, which
is normally used to receive incoming UDP syslog messages (search Google
for port
Debian Slink is the original basis of LRP and its descendants. It is now
available at http://archive.debian.org/dists/slink/
-Richard
-Original Message-
From: Martin Schulze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 6:09 AM
To: Debian News Channel
Subject: Debian Weekly
Is your ramdisk full, by chance?
-Richard
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ryan P.
Matijcio
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 10:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Leaf-user] Syslog not loggin on Oxygen
Anyone have this
The 486 dlc was an odd beast without an fpu. You need a kernel
with built-in 387 emulation.
-Richard
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Robert
Chambers
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2001 8:22 PM
To: leaf
Subject: [Leaf-user] Dachstein
http://www.networkice.com/advice/Exploits/Ports/21157/default.ht
m says that port 21157 is used by the Activision gaming protocol
(UDP). The source IP, 192.168.0.1 is odd; are you connected to a
cable modem, or a university or some other large network?
-Richard
-Original Message-
This
Debian potato stores network configuration information in
/etc/network/interfaces for use with compiled ifup and ifdown
programs.
-Richard
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Charles Steinkuehler
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 6:58
snip
Background material here:
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/dnscache6.html
Aha! That's exactly why I didn't want to trust my
first reaction ;
I misread those links and thought that it was an
either-or scenario.
Now, I understand where I need *both* dnscache and
tinydns;
I haven't used the multi298 package, but you should tell us what you did
in detail, not just that you followed the instructions. In particular,
describe how you modified syslinux.cfg.
-Richard
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ahmad
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/thc/dox/martian.txt is the FM
By the way, the FM at lrp.c0wz.com, seems to be down, at least on ports
80 and 81.
Yes, I know what martians are. Yes, I know how they can occur.
No, I do not know how to locate and eradicate this one ;
martian source
Dnscache+tinydns can be configured to do exactly what you
describe. Bind
dnscache to the internal interface of your LRP box and
configure your
internal hosts to use it as their DNS server. Bind tinydns
to localhost
(127.0.0.1) on the LRP box and load it with information on your
Richard,
Thanks for the reply. I was hoping to find a method
where I didn't have to run a master DNS, though tinydns
sounds like the best solution.
I'm not sure one could run it on their LRP without paying
extra to Wacbell.
But a cacheing dns server that could somehow be loaded
Thank you, my routing problem is over now.
The PPPD problem remains. There seems to be a
misunderstanging about that (my fault, didn't supply enough info).
I'm using a package called ADSL.lrp, it contains a few
scripts, some other stuff that my ISP requires and PPTP and PPPD.
So I DON'T
Um, I already suggested a fix for your pppd startup problem. Did you try
it?
There are several well known bugs in the 2.9.8 scripts. One of them is
in
##
#
# Gateways (Default Routes)
Maybe, if you run it low and slow (low voltage and slow speed, that is).
-Richard
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Binh Do
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 12:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Leaf-user] Could the CPU fan removed?
Please send messages in plain text, not HTML
From my last message on this subject:
Since the original poster isn't firewalling, he may need to add
ipchains -A forward -j ACCEPT to /etc/network_direct.conf
-Richard
-Original Message-
From: Ahmad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday,
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/content.php?menu=1105page_id=19 reveals
all. Look for FAQs sec13: Developer Questions Answered near the bottom
of the page.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001
85 matches
Mail list logo
