Re: [leaf-user] Harddisk: Device not configured

2004-07-13 Thread Jon Clausen
On Wed, 07 Jul, 2004 at 00:41:31 +0200, Erich Titl wrote: I have a 2.4.24 kernel environment which I use for the pcengines kernel, you may want to have a look http://www.think.ch/leaf/styx/2.4.20/ Great! (that would be: http://www.think.ch/leaf/styx/2.4.24/) I'm getting

Re: [leaf-user] Harddisk: Device not configured

2004-07-13 Thread Erich Titl
Jon At 14:55 13.07.2004 +0200, you wrote: On Wed, 07 Jul, 2004 at 00:41:31 +0200, Erich Titl wrote: I have a 2.4.24 kernel environment which I use for the pcengines kernel, you may want to have a look http://www.think.ch/leaf/styx/2.4.20/ Great! (that would be:

Re: [leaf-user] Harddisk: Device not configured

2004-07-13 Thread Erich Titl
Jon At 17:23 13.07.2004 +0200, Jon Clausen wrote: On Tue, 13 Jul, 2004 at 16:16:48 +0200, Erich Titl wrote: Jon snip Next step is to get the 'Bering patches' applied. Look into the Makefile it's easy to extend if you like it. Indeed this looks nice. Sadly I don't fully understand

Re: [leaf-user] Harddisk: Device not configured

2004-07-06 Thread Erich Titl
Jon At 23:38 05.07.2004 +0200, Jon Clausen wrote: On Mon, 05 Jul, 2004 at 07:15:03 +0200, Jon Clausen wrote: snip Right. I'm gonna have to look closer at the actual cpu info, when I get off work. I have none of the above set ATM, so maybe the K6* option is the ticket... Recompiled as K6,

Re: [leaf-user] Harddisk: Device not configured

2004-07-06 Thread Jon Clausen
On Tue, 06 Jul, 2004 at 09:03:30 +0200, Erich Titl wrote: I found this http://www.viaarena.com/?PageID=368 and some other sites which look promising. In the end though, I'm beginning to suspect that 2.4.20 may be too 'old'. Main reason being that the SuSE kernel is 2.4.21-something In

Re: [leaf-user] Harddisk: Device not configured

2004-07-06 Thread Erich Titl
Jon At 19:53 06.07.2004, Jon Clausen wrote: On Tue, 06 Jul, 2004 at 09:03:30 +0200, Erich Titl wrote: I found this http://www.viaarena.com/?PageID=368 and some other sites which look promising. In the end though, I'm beginning to suspect that 2.4.20 may be too 'old'. Main reason being that

Re: [leaf-user] Harddisk: Device not configured

2004-07-05 Thread Jon Clausen
On Mon, 05 Jul, 2004 at 01:15:09 +0200, Erich Titl wrote: Jon Thanks for the reply. At 17:51 04.07.2004, you wrote: snip The mobo has a VIA vt82c686b ide-controller, so consequently I have CONFIG_BLK_DEV_VIA82CXXX=y in the kernel config -which I would've thought should cover it.

Re: [leaf-user] Harddisk: Device not configured

2004-07-05 Thread Jon Clausen
On Mon, 05 Jul, 2004 at 07:15:03 +0200, Jon Clausen wrote: snip Right. I'm gonna have to look closer at the actual cpu info, when I get off work. I have none of the above set ATM, so maybe the K6* option is the ticket... Recompiled as K6, no improvement :P Actually it's not a C3, though...

[leaf-user] Harddisk: Device not configured

2004-07-04 Thread Jon Clausen
Hi. I have one of these: http://www.sys-media.it/cv860a.html - which I've succeeded in setting up as a dual WAN router. It boots off a 64MB CF, and runs a self-compiled 2.4.20 kernel with Bering as well as Julian Anastasov's 'dgd' patches applied. Everything works nicely and it performs great,

Re: [leaf-user] Harddisk: Device not configured

2004-07-04 Thread Jon Clausen
On Sun, 04 Jul, 2004 at 17:51:23 +0200, Jon Clausen wrote: Hi. I have one of these: http://www.sys-media.it/cv860a.html - which I've succeeded in setting up as a dual WAN router. ... Bering 1.2 ...I forgot to mention :P /Jon -- Just say know!

Re: [leaf-user] Harddisk: Device not configured

2004-07-04 Thread Erich Titl
Jon At 17:51 04.07.2004, you wrote: Hi. I have one of these: http://www.sys-media.it/cv860a.html - which I've succeeded in setting up as a dual WAN router. It boots off a 64MB CF, and runs a self-compiled 2.4.20 kernel with Bering as well as Julian Anastasov's 'dgd' patches applied. Everything