On Wed, 07 Jul, 2004 at 00:41:31 +0200, Erich Titl wrote:
I have a 2.4.24 kernel environment which I use for the pcengines
kernel, you may want to have a look
http://www.think.ch/leaf/styx/2.4.20/
Great! (that would be: http://www.think.ch/leaf/styx/2.4.24/)
I'm getting
Jon
At 14:55 13.07.2004 +0200, you wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jul, 2004 at 00:41:31 +0200, Erich Titl wrote:
I have a 2.4.24 kernel environment which I use for the pcengines
kernel, you may want to have a look
http://www.think.ch/leaf/styx/2.4.20/
Great! (that would be:
Jon
At 17:23 13.07.2004 +0200, Jon Clausen wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jul, 2004 at 16:16:48 +0200, Erich Titl wrote:
Jon
snip
Next step is to get the 'Bering patches' applied.
Look into the Makefile it's easy to extend if you like it.
Indeed this looks nice. Sadly I don't fully understand
Jon
At 23:38 05.07.2004 +0200, Jon Clausen wrote:
On Mon, 05 Jul, 2004 at 07:15:03 +0200, Jon Clausen wrote:
snip
Right. I'm gonna have to look closer at the actual cpu info, when I get off
work. I have none of the above set ATM, so maybe the K6* option is the
ticket...
Recompiled as K6,
On Tue, 06 Jul, 2004 at 09:03:30 +0200, Erich Titl wrote:
I found this http://www.viaarena.com/?PageID=368 and some other sites which
look promising.
In the end though, I'm beginning to suspect that 2.4.20 may be too 'old'.
Main reason being that the SuSE kernel is 2.4.21-something
In
Jon
At 19:53 06.07.2004, Jon Clausen wrote:
On Tue, 06 Jul, 2004 at 09:03:30 +0200, Erich Titl wrote:
I found this http://www.viaarena.com/?PageID=368 and some other sites
which
look promising.
In the end though, I'm beginning to suspect that 2.4.20 may be too 'old'.
Main reason being that
On Mon, 05 Jul, 2004 at 01:15:09 +0200, Erich Titl wrote:
Jon
Thanks for the reply.
At 17:51 04.07.2004, you wrote:
snip
The mobo has a VIA vt82c686b ide-controller, so consequently I have
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_VIA82CXXX=y in the kernel config
-which I would've thought should cover it.
On Mon, 05 Jul, 2004 at 07:15:03 +0200, Jon Clausen wrote:
snip
Right. I'm gonna have to look closer at the actual cpu info, when I get off
work. I have none of the above set ATM, so maybe the K6* option is the
ticket...
Recompiled as K6, no improvement :P
Actually it's not a C3, though...
Hi.
I have one of these:
http://www.sys-media.it/cv860a.html
- which I've succeeded in setting up as a dual WAN router.
It boots off a 64MB CF, and runs a self-compiled 2.4.20 kernel with Bering
as well as Julian Anastasov's 'dgd' patches applied.
Everything works nicely and it performs great,
On Sun, 04 Jul, 2004 at 17:51:23 +0200, Jon Clausen wrote:
Hi.
I have one of these:
http://www.sys-media.it/cv860a.html
- which I've succeeded in setting up as a dual WAN router.
... Bering 1.2 ...I forgot to mention :P
/Jon
--
Just say know!
Jon
At 17:51 04.07.2004, you wrote:
Hi.
I have one of these:
http://www.sys-media.it/cv860a.html
- which I've succeeded in setting up as a dual WAN router.
It boots off a 64MB CF, and runs a self-compiled 2.4.20 kernel with Bering
as well as Julian Anastasov's 'dgd' patches applied.
Everything
11 matches
Mail list logo