Hi,
Some news of my problem. Finally, I initiated myself with buildtool,
following higher url. When I downloaded source, I could see you had modified
the sources of original kernel with many patch -- as I wanted, natsemi wd
support in particular :p --
(I was surprised to see the conntrack for
Hi David,
Iptables and the kernel are very close bound. If you compile your own
kernel with different patches, you better can compile your own
iptables too. The iptables Makefile looks at the kernel config, so
it's very well possible it doesn't 'match' or you need some iptables
patches.
Eric
Well, I feared a response of this kind. Compile a kernel is easy, compile
iptables with this kernel too, but compile iptables for uclibc, I never yet
made, and I feel I will have much problems…:D :-/
Which manner I can do that? Install buildroot is the better/only solution ?
As I didn't touch the
David,
The preferway to do this is to use buildtool:
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/doc/buc-buildtool.html
You can tune the kernel config to your like in the setup and add your
specific patches to the ones already applied.
But what patches do you use and what kernel config changes did you make?
Hi David,
Looking at you initial mail again:
The last interesting line of syslog is :
Nov 12 00:19:10 Darkvabox kernel: kmod: failed to exec /sbin/modprobe -s
-k ipt_MASQUERADE, errno = 2 . :-S
Normal, modprobe is not available ...
You probably have your private kernel compiled with
Ok thank you. Without this option (kmod), error message in syslog
disappears. However, the option -J MASQUERADE still doesn't work, and
iptables give me the same error. (ipt_MASQUERADE is correctly loaded) I will
try to compile iptables, following your url.
But what patches do you use and what
Hi all,
I need to make some test for iptables on my bering box. I was on
Bering-uClibc 2.3 (i believe) before. When I used shorewall, it crashed on
masquerade rules with an Unknows error -1
I think that maybe, the iptables.lrp didn't correspond with my bering
version. So, I upgraded bering uclibc
Tom
At 15:31 27.05.2003, Tom Eastep wrote:
On Tue, 27 May 2003 15:14:32 +0200, Erich Titl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christophe
At 15:05 27.05.2003 +0200, you wrote:
On Tue, 27 May 2003 14:52:40 +0200
Erich Titl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am not aware that you can use a parameter in the rules
