[leaf-user] Question on Shorewall/blacklist/DNAT

2003-12-21 Thread Tony
Good Morning, I have the latest version of Bering UlibC with shorewall 1.4.5. I also run a DMZ with an ftp server. The DNAT rule logs at the info level so I can see who is accessing the server. I have blacklisted China and Korea according to http://www.okean.com/asianspamblocks.html Now, last

Re: [leaf-user] Question on Shorewall/blacklist/DNAT

2003-12-21 Thread Victor McAllister
Tony wrote: Good Morning, I have the latest version of Bering UlibC with shorewall 1.4.5. I also run a DMZ with an ftp server. The DNAT rule logs at the info level so I can see who is accessing the server. I have blacklisted China and Korea according to

Re: [leaf-user] Question on Shorewall/blacklist/DNAT

2003-12-21 Thread Tony
Yup, did all that. The actual file reads: net eth0detect dhcp,routefilter,norfc1918,blacklist loc eth1detect dmz eth2detect And the ip's are showing up in the shorewall status under the blacklist column. Thanks Tony Victor McAllister wrote: Tony wrote: Good Morning,

Re: [leaf-user] Question on Shorewall/blacklist/DNAT

2003-12-21 Thread Tom Eastep
On Sunday 21 December 2003 06:00 am, Tony wrote: But, my blacklist includes 210.82.0.0/15 Also, my shorewall log shows no hit which I didn't expect to, and the counter in shorewall status shows one hit for that range. My question is, did he get blocked or allowed access? It looks as

Re: [leaf-user] Question on Shorewall/blacklist/DNAT

2003-12-21 Thread Tony
OK, so what you're saying is the packet was logged up in the pre-routing NAT section before it got dropped by the blacklisting filter at the Forward section? Thanks, Tony Tom Eastep wrote: snip No. Blacklist rules are enforced in the 'filter' table whereas DNAT is logged out of the 'nat'

Re: [leaf-user] Question on Shorewall/blacklist/DNAT

2003-12-21 Thread Tom Eastep
On Sunday 21 December 2003 08:36 am, Tony wrote: OK, so what you're saying is the packet was logged up in the pre-routing NAT section before it got dropped by the blacklisting filter at the Forward section? Yes. If you want to log these connections out of the FORWARD chain, replace your