Lynn Avants wrote:
I just didn't know how tunneling methods were integrated
into Java other than possibly a call built-into the source.
I think I'm back to my previous question, aren't these
tunnel programs run as seperate apps from the GUI?
What I mean is, there aren't any
I'm referring to only packaging meaning having within the same lrp.
Additionally, the package installer should load all modules that are
tarred within the package as they are deemed necessary for the
utilities to work. I'm not suggesting that the module be compiled or
integrated. Can we do
Lynn Avants wrote:
Matt,
Are lshd,
Sounds new. what's the benefit of lshd?
stunnel,
http://tinyurl.com/63lh
or zebedee also feasible options with Java???
Don't see why not, isn't this, like stunnel, completely
seperate from the application?
It's another thing to compile and make
On Wednesday 19 February 2003 04:18 pm, Matt Schalit wrote:
Lynn Avants wrote:
Matt,
Are lshd,
Sounds new. what's the benefit of lshd?
It is somewhat compatible with SSH, but smaller.
It is available for uClibc-bering and probably Bering as well.
stunnel,
Mosquito and other off-LEAF
GUI Pre-rollout Config
==
We are thinking it'd be cool, if you wanted to, to download
a fat CD of everything LEAF on it, burn the thing, and use it to
build yourself a custom LEAF floppy. You'd do this before you
rollout that floppy to the LEAF box. You could save
Alex Rhomberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is a good place to advertise my work: I have written a bunch of
scripts
Could you add a link please?
Regards, Frank
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
Watts/austin/Nlynx)
Subject: [leaf-user] Update: Short term LEAF project goals
This is an unofficial message to let folks know what
the short term goals are for the LEAF project, the hot
topics being developed, just in case you're not monitoring
the leaf-devel list. I wasn't asked to write
S Mohan wrote:
I'd also suggest a change in lrp packaging by which the modules required
for a package to run is bundled with the lrp. Installing the lrp will
also insmod the module automatically. A depmod kind of facility will
make it easy to use/ configure LEAF.
Give me an example please of
S Mohan wrote:
I'd also suggest a change in lrp packaging by which the modules
required
for a package to run is bundled with the lrp. Installing the lrp
will
also insmod the module automatically. A depmod kind of facility will
make it easy to use/ configure LEAF.
Give me an example
On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Matt Schalit wrote:
S Mohan wrote:
I'd also suggest a change in lrp packaging by which the modules required
for a package to run is bundled with the lrp. Installing the lrp will
also insmod the module automatically. A depmod kind of facility will
make it easy to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You asked for comments:
I long ago created my own database, wherein
Thanks for posting your information about the
db you created. In our discussions, we've called
this a flat databse, meaning that the entire
database is a single bash sourceable text file
containing
]
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Update: Short term LEAF project goals
On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Matt Schalit wrote:
S Mohan wrote:
I'd also suggest a change in lrp packaging by which the modules
required for a package to run is bundled with the lrp. Installing
the lrp will also insmod the module
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Update: Short term LEAF project goals
I think that in most cases coupling the base user-level package with an
application-specific set of kernel modules makes more sense than
integrating the two. If you really want idiot-level integration, then
fall back
S Mohan wrote:
While I'm not that aware of various options, I think a few modules are
mandatory or have to go with some packages. E.g. ipsec.o with
ipsec(509).lrp, bridge.o with bridge.lrp, netfilter with tc.lrp etc. I
was looking at this. In addition, 90-95% of the users would use a common
On Tuesday 18 February 2003 09:19 pm, Tom Eastep wrote:
I rather favor a mechanism whereby package-module dependencies can be
expressed in the package. Including kernel modules in .lrp's like ppp,
pppoa or shorwall (just to name one) will yield nightmarish results when
we try to introduce a
On Tuesday 18 February 2003 12:36 pm, Matt Schalit wrote:
Java has ssh support built in. The LEAF system requirements
are: sshd.lrp. That presents a space issue for any single
floppy rollout, our classic format.
Matt,
Are lshd, stunnel, or zebedee also feasible options with Java???
--
.
Mohan
-Original Message-
From: Tom Eastep [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 19 February 2003 08:49
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Update: Short term LEAF project goals
S Mohan wrote:
While I'm not that aware of various options, I think a few modules
This is an unofficial message to let folks know what
the short term goals are for the LEAF project, the hot
topics being developed, just in case you're not monitoring
the leaf-devel list. I wasn't asked to write this, but I
figured it'd might help a bit. Please toss in your comments
if you'd
On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 10:39, Matt Schalit wrote:
This is an unofficial message to let folks know what
the short term goals are for the LEAF project, the hot
topics being developed, just in case you're not monitoring
the leaf-devel list. I wasn't asked to write this, but I
figured it'd might
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matt Schalit
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 12:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [leaf-user] Update: Short term LEAF project goals
This is an unofficial message to let folks know what
the short term goals are for the LEAF project, the hot
20 matches
Mail list logo
