please notify the sender by reply transmission and
delete the message without copying or disclosing it.
- -Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sean
Sent: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 12:38
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Charles Steinkuehler';
[EMAIL P
or disclosing it.
- -Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Charles
Steinkuehler
Sent: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 01:01
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Sean'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Dachstein-CD update
> There are other additions
> There are other additions to the netsork.conf file that I have also
made to
> get multilink isdn connections to work here and I would be happy to
supply
> them to anyone who would like them.
Please post them to the list, and I'll look them over. Maybe I'll even
take the opportunity to add the
9:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [leaf-user] Dachstein-CD update
I'll look into adding this. This is the second request for Weblet changes.
I have not been keeping up with Weblet. Can you get back to me with more
details? Is there a new LRP package, or does one have to
This is an update on my progress.
1. diskfree.sh - This may take awhile to incorporate, on the back burner for
the moment.
2. MAC script change(modules/modutils) *DONE!
3. p9100.lrp if Bihn Do tests it and lets me know *DONE! Added p9100 and
modified root.lrp to create lp0 and par0
4. Unknown W
On Saturday 15 June 2002 09:07, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
> Sean =>
>
> A bit pressed for time this weekend; and, this may take more time
> than you anticipated.
> If we push completion of this out to end of month, I can be more help
I would tend to think that Michael is right here. It would be
Sean =>
A bit pressed for time this weekend; and, this may take more time than
you anticipated.
Sean wrote:
>
> diskfree.sh
>
> Ok, I'll bite. I think I must have missed this thread. Where is this
> supposed to go? What was this supposed to fix? I'm trying to add it to the
> new CD.
Look
y, June 14, 2002 10:55 AM
To: Sean; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Dachstein-CD update
> I have added all the new packages as requested so far and included bind-8
as
> well (someone asked for it a long time ago in leaf-user).
Which bind version? IIRC, there are known security p
es Steinkuehler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 10:55 AM
To: Sean; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Dachstein-CD update
> I have added all the new packages as requested so far and included bind-8
as
> well (someone asked for it a long time ago in leaf-user).
.
-Original Message-
--__--__--
Message: 3
From: "Charles Steinkuehler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Sean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Dachstein-CD update
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 09:54:54 -0500
> I have added all
> > > Shall I call it v1.0.3?
> >
> > I'd call it v1.0.3 or v1.0.3rc1 (release candidate 1), depending on
> > confidence level :)
>
> Gads... three levels of versioning isn't enough? :)
Apparently not. :-)
Note the kernel itself, and many other software projects (like bind, for
instance) use a
On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
[...]
> > Shall I call it v1.0.3?
>
> I'd call it v1.0.3 or v1.0.3rc1 (release candidate 1), depending on
> confidence level :)
Gads... three levels of versioning isn't enough? :)
> I have added all the new packages as requested so far and included bind-8
as
> well (someone asked for it a long time ago in leaf-user).
Which bind version? IIRC, there are known security problems with all the
bind's currently packaged for LRP.
> I added the two
> sample .cfg files. I update
Of Charles
Steinkuehler
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 4:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Dachstein-CD update
> Extremely easy usability fix for /usr/sbin/lrpkg:
>
> http://www.geocrawler.com/lists/3/SourceForge/7325/175/8861202/
Yeah, this should be added if you feel up to re
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Charles
Steinkuehler
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 4:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Dachstein-CD update
> Extremely easy usability fix for /usr/sbin/lrpkg:
>
> http://www.geocrawler.com/lists/3/SourceForge/7325/175/8861202/
Yeah, t
> Extremely easy usability fix for /usr/sbin/lrpkg:
>
> http://www.geocrawler.com/lists/3/SourceForge/7325/175/8861202/
Yeah, this should be added if you feel up to re-packaging root.lrp. Note
that the problem only occurs on MSDOS filesystems (where package.lrp.lrp is
the same file as package.l
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> > I'm actually working on an updated cd. I have
> > added/updated ipmail.lrp, udhcp.lrp, sshkey.lrp,
> > sshd.lrp, sshd.lrp, sftp.lrp, and my libz.lrp was
> > updated previously. Any other packages I should
> > update/add? How about recent scr
Got them!
I'll wait until later tonight before making the ISO in
case anyone else has something to add.
Where should I upload the ISO to?
> > I already have psentry.lrp on my CD! Where are the
> > latest .lrp for the other packages? I get lost easily
> > on sourceforge. I'd be glad to add
> I already have psentry.lrp on my CD! Where are the
> latest .lrp for the other packages? I get lost easily
> on sourceforge. I'd be glad to add those other packages.
Jacques Nilo:
libz
ssh* (add sftp)
keyboard.lrp
ez-ipupd.lrp
Michael D. Schelif:
ntpclnt (ntpclient)
> The only request I'd add is to update ipsec and ipsec509 to
> FreeS/WAN 1.97. I'd volunteer to compile them, but my RH 5.2 machine
> blew it's HD about 48 hours after I installed it, so I'm without a
> compatible compile environment. If it would gar-run-tee an update, I
> could throw a new drive
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> > I'm actually working on an updated cd. I have
> > added/updated ipmail.lrp, udhcp.lrp, sshkey.lrp,
> > sshd.lrp, sshd.lrp, sftp.lrp, and my libz.lrp was
> > updated previously. Any other packages I should
> > update/add? How about recent scr
> I'm actually working on an updated cd. I have
> added/updated ipmail.lrp, udhcp.lrp, sshkey.lrp,
> sshd.lrp, sshd.lrp, sftp.lrp, and my libz.lrp was
> updated previously. Any other packages I should
> update/add? How about recent script changes? I'd be
> willing to update those as well if ne
22 matches
Mail list logo
