> Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 14:21:38 -0600
> From: "Doug Hite" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [leaf-user] Current Source for DLink - DFE-570TX ???
>
> Does anybody have a current US source for the=20
> DLink - DFE-570TX 4 port Tulip based card ? This
> card doesn't seem to
Hi there,
I've recently had a cable modem installed at my house, shared between 3
users.
I've got it all working nicely with the default policies of
Net loc REJECT
Loc net ACCEPT
And I have added the following rules to allow my pc (192.168.1.1) to use
Direct Connect in Active mode behind th
Support Requests item #669688, was opened at 2003-01-17 11:24
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=213751&aid=669688&group_id=13751
Category: Release/Branch: Bering
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Gerd Niemetz (gniemetz)
Assigned to: Mi
Hi!
First i want to thank the bering-team for the great work
they do!
Now to the problem:
I'm having a Samsung Cablemodem connected via a
Accton-Ethernet card to my ISP and i'm not able to
get an IP-Address via dhclient/pump, only when i use
the dhcpcd package (older one, found it somewher
Hi,
Yes, There is a Package and it works quite well.
My dhcprelay in /etc/init.d looks like that:
#!/bin/sh
# This shell script takes care of starting and stopping dhcrelay.
RCDLINKS="2,S41 3,S41 6,K41"
# Add interfaces or servers, separated by a space.
ifs="eth1 eth2 eth3 eth4"
servers="172.16
Hi Gerd
At 06:26 17/01/03 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having a Samsung Cablemodem connected via a
Accton-Ethernet card to my ISP and i'm not able to
get an IP-Address via dhclient/pump, only when i use
the dhcpcd package (older one, found it somewhere in
the net :-)).
Pump and dhclient
Hi Julien!
Thanks for your reply, but you have misunderstood my question, i asked about dhcpcd,
as you can see :-)
regards
Gerd
Julian Church <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi Gerd
>
>At 06:26 17/01/03 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>I'm having a Samsung Cablemodem connected via a
>>Accton-Et
Hi,
I'm getting the following error in my logs :
sshd[1986]: channel 3: open failed: connect failed: Remote port is not
recognised
Can anyone tell me what this error means and/or what is causing it ?
My guess is it has something todo with portforwarding, but searching Google
doesn't give me any
More in the saga of wireless network connectivity. =)
Someone mailed me off-list to report that they had enjoyed success with their
Orinoco card using the 8.10 firmware revision. So I downgraded the firmware
in both of my cards. Again, everything appears to work at first. Now,
however, the
--On Friday, January 17, 2003 8:56 AM + James Neave
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi there,
I've recently had a cable modem installed at my house, shared between 3
users.
I've got it all working nicely with the default policies of
Net loc REJECT
The default as shipped is actually "net loc
Support Requests item #669688, was opened at 2003-01-17 11:24
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=213751&aid=669688&group_id=13751
Category: Release/Branch: Bering
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Gerd Niemetz (gniemetz)
>Assigned to: J
James,
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003 08:56:27 GMT James wrote:
> I've recently had a cable modem installed at my house, shared between
> 3 users.
> I've got it all working nicely with the default policies of
>
> Net loc REJECT
> Loc net ACCEPT
A lot of people use DROP rather than REJECT for net->loc .
Scott,
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003 09:34:24 EST Scott wrote:
> More in the saga of wireless network connectivity. =)
>
> Someone mailed me off-list to report that they had enjoyed success with their
> Orinoco card using the 8.10 firmware revision.
I have also had success with firmware 8.10 (and 6.16
On Friday 17 January 2003 10:16 am, you wrote:
> Never seen those error messages before. Something is defintely wrong,
> but I'm not sure what. You might get better help on the orinoco-user
> list:
> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=orinoco-users
>
> or in the samba wireless a
Scott,
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003 10:25:36 EST Scott Merrill wrote:
> On Friday 17 January 2003 10:16 am, you wrote:
> > Never seen those error messages before. Something is defintely wrong,
> > but I'm not sure what. You might get better help on the orinoco-user
> > list:
> > http://sourceforge.ne
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 17:19, wispdist wrote:
> I am running build 2397 on some of our routers now. I have noticed that I
> cannot ping them. They do not respond to a ping. I can ping from them and
> through them though.
>
> Anyone else seen this?
wispdist,
This resource may answer your questio
Any one know if a linux router can act like a token ring bridge?
Will it handle source routing?
Error monitoring? replacing tokens? all that token ringish stuff.
I a card working with the olympic driver, but don't know whether I
should try to spend the time to replace some old bridges we have
> --On Thursday, January 16, 2003 4:52 PM -0800 Brock Nanson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Googling suggested that this was a firewall issue
> > so I played about with that for a while - finally got it to stop by
> > adjusting the Shorewall rules to ACCEPT UDP 67 and 68
> between the Bering
--On Friday, January 17, 2003 8:37 AM -0800 Brock Nanson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--On Thursday, January 16, 2003 4:52 PM -0800 Brock Nanson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Googling suggested that this was a firewall issue
> so I played about with that for a while - finally got it to stop by
>
As far as I know, all LEAF variants use version 2.0pl5 of the ISC dhcp
implementation, including the relay and server. The current (3.0)
versions of these programs are significantly larger. The security
advisory applies to the 3.0 versions, but the 2.0 versions are obsolete
and unmaintained.
In e
Yeah, but, what package is?? and where can i get it
I install dhcpd.lrp but the dhcrelay don't exist in the package! =(
Samuel Abreu
Hi,
Yes, There is a Package and it works quite well.
My dhcprelay in /etc/init.d looks like that:
#!/bin/sh
# This shell script takes care of starting and st
Brad Fritz wrote:
IIRC, Matt built his from scratch, but that's not really necessary.
Just grab the kernel (linux-2.4.20.upx), pcmcia_orinoco.lrp and
modules.lrp from
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bering/latest/contrib/2.4.20/
> http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bering/late
WISP-Dist does not use Shorewall.
Mike Noyes wrote:
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 17:19, wispdist wrote:
I am running build 2397 on some of our routers now. I have noticed that I
cannot ping them. They do not respond to a ping. I can ping from them and
through them though.
Anyone else seen this?
On Fri, 2003-01-17 at 11:18, Vladimir I. wrote:
>
> WISP-Dist does not use Shorewall.
Vladimir,
I stand corrected. I apologize for providing incorrect information.
> Mike Noyes wrote:
> > On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 17:19, wispdist wrote:
> >
> >>I am running build 2397 on some of our routers now.
Matt,
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003 10:54:47 PST Matt Schalit wrote:
> Brad Fritz wrote:
>
> > IIRC, Matt built his from scratch, but that's not really necessary.
>
> To be clear, I built mine entirely from .lrps available above,
> following the guides 98% to the letter. I didn't compile anything.
Tha
wispdist,
> > On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 17:19, wispdist wrote:
> >
> >>I am running build 2397 on some of our routers now. I have noticed that I
> >>cannot ping them. They do not respond to a ping. I can ping from them and
> >>through them though.
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003 21:18:11 +0200 Vladimir I. w
Samuel,
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003 18:21:12 GMT Samuel Abreu wrote:
> Yeah, but, what package is?? and where can i get it
> I install dhcpd.lrp but the dhcrelay don't exist in the package! =(
There are a few listed in the leaf package list at:
http://leaf-project.org/pub/packages-list.html
T
Gerd,
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003 08:25:26 EST gniemetz wrote:
> >At 06:26 17/01/03 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >>I'm having a Samsung Cablemodem connected via a
> >>Accton-Ethernet card to my ISP and i'm not able to
> >>get an IP-Address via dhclient/pump, only when i use
> >>the dhcpcd packa
Please give more information about network - interfaces, IP addresses
etc. Do you get "network unreachable" messages? Did you tweak iptables
configuration?
wispdist wrote:
I am running build 2397 on some of our routers now. I have noticed that I
cannot ping them. They do not respond to a ping.
Brad Fritz has already pointed you to
http://leaf-project.org/pub/packages-list.html
n Fri, 2003-01-17 at 11:51, Samuel Abreu wrote:
> Hi, i get Bering stable and the binary dhcrelay don't exist in the distro,
> or in dhcpd.lrp, so, u can say me what package i find dhcrelay??? Thanks
>
> S
--On Friday, January 17, 2003 12:50:57 PM -0800 Richard Doyle
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Brad Fritz has already pointed you to
http://leaf-project.org/pub/packages-list.html
As far as Shorewall goes, simply specify the 'dhcp' option in
/etc/shorewall/interfaces for all interfaces involve
On Fri, 2003-01-17 at 11:55, Brad Fritz wrote:
> There is also a dhcpreli.lrp package in
> http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bering/latest/contrib/
>
> that appears to be v0.3.1 of:
>
> http://www.strongsec.com/freeswan/dhcprelay/
>
> $ tar -xzf /tmp/dhcpreli.lrp -O ./var/lib/lrpkg/
Hi Tom,
You asked what version I'm running... Not too sure - I don't have access
to the box at the moment. However, the snippet you included in your
message to the list jogged my memory. I was working on doing something
along the lines of WISP-Dist for a local group a year or so ago and was
chas
--On Friday, January 17, 2003 01:31:45 PM -0800 Brock Nanson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The good news is I solved the problem! ;-) But I still don't know how
I was able to get the lease in the first place!
I don't know either -- sometime when I'm bored, I'll look into it since
I've seen
Hi,
New WISP-Dist test build 2493 is available. Mostly it is a couple of
bugfixes to the previous test build. The major change is that ext2 is
used instead of minix on the rw partition, this freed up considerable
amount of space as it seems that minix is not efficient when storing
symlinks.
I
Le Vendredi 17 Janvier 2003 14:25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
I have compiled the dhcpcd client from Debian.
It is untested. Give it a try and let us know.
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bering/latest/packages/
I still find it strange that you can succeed with it and not with pump or
dhc
Chris wrote:
Two things:
1) Is this bad or normal:
Jan 16 15:23:05 Nimrod kernel: The PCI BIOS has not enabled the device at
0/48! Updating PCI command 0003->0007.
Jan 16 15:23:05 Nimrod kernel: eth0: RealTek RTL8139 Fast Ethernet at
0xfe00, IRQ 9, 00:90:47:01:98:80.
Jan 16 15:23:05 Nimrod ker
I'm trying with little success to get PCMCIA NICs working with Dachstein.
Does anyone know of a Dachstein pcmcia.lrp package?
Roger
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Thawte.com - A 128-bit supercerts will
allow you to extend the highes
Brad Fritz wrote:
#1 occurs because etc/pcmcia/wavelan2_cs.conf is included in the
pcmcia_orinoco.lrp package.
Ahh, yes, when I rename that file, and svi restart pcmcia,
then it loads with orinoco_cs, rather than wavelan2_cs.
Now I'll have to get the laptop to test.
Matt
Support Requests item #669688, was opened at 2003-01-17 12:24
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=213751&aid=669688&group_id=13751
Category: Release/Branch: Bering
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Gerd Niemetz (gniemetz)
Assigned to: Ja
Replying to my own post...
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003 15:07:53 EST I wrote:
> > Thanks for your reply, but you have misunderstood my question, i asked about
> > dhcpcd, as you can see :-)
^^^
> Your first "question" was a statement, and a confusing one at that.
> What exactly is your question,
I just got my Feb. 2003 issue of SysAdmin, and was pleased to see an
article about LEAF.
In "Increasing Bandwidth with Wireless Devices", Henry Psenicka nad Bob
Pocius go over the details of migrating their WAN from 128Kbit/s ISDN
links to point-point wireless using 802.11 wireless devices and
42 matches
Mail list logo
