RE: [leaf-user] RE: wifi modules

Hi! -Original Message- From: Matija Papec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I will do it, but probably only this weekend. Module will be compiled for the latest Bering uClibc version. Tnx! Meanwhile I haven't got the chance to do it, ie: it has slipped my mind... Luis Correia Bering

Re: [leaf-user] syslog message: firewall kernel: ip_conntrack: table full, dropping packet.

Hello Eric, Thanks for you reply. After increasing the ip_conntrack_max value to 4096 I did find a curious entry in my messages log file : firewall kernel: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation failed (gfp=0x1d2/0) This happened twice about a day ago. According to the bucu-conntrack guide the

Re: [leaf-user] copy Bering floppy to CF card

Hello Eric, Thanks for your reply. Does it make sense to create some swap space on the CF? Regards Chera Bekker Eric Spakman wrote: Hello Chera, The easiest way is to use initrd_ide.lrp (with ide boot modules) from:

RE: [leaf-user] Puzzling Shorewall log entry?

Jim, Since nobody else has replied, I'll take a crack. An rfc1918 packet arrived at your external interface and you have norfc1918 specified on that interface. Most likely originated from your ISP's equipment, hit your firewall, and was dropped by norfc1918. A successful guess of your internal

[leaf-user] OpenVPN

Hi, I would like to get the feedback of people who have succesfully installed/tested openvpn with bering. Thanks Sylvain --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new

Re: [leaf-user] copy Bering floppy to CF card

Hello Chera, Thanks for your reply. Does it make sense to create some swap space on the CF? No, that isn't necessary or used. Bering-uClibc is running in memory, the flash is only used for booting. Regards Chera Bekker Regards, Eric

Re: [leaf-user] syslog message: firewall kernel: ip_conntrack: table full, dropping packet.

Hello Chera, Hello Eric, Thanks for you reply. After increasing the ip_conntrack_max value to 4096 I did find a curious entry in my messages log file : firewall kernel: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation failed (gfp=0x1d2/0) This happened twice about a day ago. I don't know what this

Re: [leaf-user] OpenVPN

Sylvain Sylvain Pelletier wrote: Hi, I would like to get the feedback of people who have succesfully installed/tested openvpn with bering. I am running it on multiple systems without a hitch using Bering glibc cheers Erich --- This

Re: [leaf-user] OpenVPN

Tens of installations using bering uclibc Ciao Gianni Hi, I would like to get the feedback of people who have succesfully installed/tested openvpn with bering. --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log

[leaf-user] RE: wifi modules

-Original Message- From: Matija Papec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I will do it, but probably only this weekend. Module will be compiled for the latest Bering uClibc version. Tnx! Meanwhile I haven't got the chance to do it, ie: it has slipped my mind... LOL Ok, I'll be waiting. :)

[leaf-user] Re: TCP Destination port DPT=2703 Blocked by Bering uClibc 2.3.1

That’s strange! 192.168.73.76 is a Gentoo Linux email (Postfix) and web (Apache) server. Why would this server try to contact 66.151.150.12 (d1.cloudmark.com)? Finally figure out! TCP 7, 2703 and UDP 6277 are used by DCC/Razor. I now have the following rules in /etc/shorewall/rules: #

[leaf-user] What modules are needed for shorewall 3.0 traffic shaping?

Hi, I upgraded to shorewall 3.x and would like to use the built-in traffic shaping. After creating some simple tc-files I started shorewall and I got error Processing /etc/shorewall/tcdevices... RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument and I think that some modules (for HTB?) are missing.

Re: [leaf-user] What modules are needed for shorewall 3.0 traffic shaping?

On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 11:55:23PM -0500, M Lu wrote: I upgraded to shorewall 3.x and would like to use the built-in traffic shaping. After creating some simple tc-files I started shorewall and I got error Processing /etc/shorewall/tcdevices... RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument and