Re: [leaf-user] leaf-user Digest, Vol 52, Issue 4 : How to install Bering uclibc to HDD

2011-01-19 Thread kenneth joachim llanto
> > Hello all, > > > > Good day! > > > > I'm quite new in linux and in LEAF. > > > > What I'm trying to do is install the bering uclibc 4.0 to a > > harddisk. And truthfully I'm a little lost.. > > > > This is what I was able to do as of now.. > > -run the iso in a cd rom.. > > The problem is I don

Re: [leaf-user] Shorewall and Bering-uClibc 4.0

2011-01-19 Thread Tom Eastep
On 1/19/11 5:08 PM, marvin horst wrote: > Sorry, I was mistaken. After remembering to reboot after uploading the > latest shorwall.lrp I found that 4.4.15 does not have any underscores in the > date format. Everything is working great. Thanks for the help KP and Tom. > > I have a question about th

Re: [leaf-user] Shorewall and Bering-uClibc 4.0

2011-01-19 Thread marvin horst
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 8:08 PM, marvin horst wrote: > Sorry, I was mistaken. After remembering to reboot after uploading the > latest shorwall.lrp I found that 4.4.15 does not have any underscores in the > date format. Everything is working great. Thanks for the help KP and Tom. > > I have a ques

Re: [leaf-user] Shorewall and Bering-uClibc 4.0

2011-01-19 Thread marvin horst
Sorry, I was mistaken. After remembering to reboot after uploading the latest shorwall.lrp I found that 4.4.15 does not have any underscores in the date format. Everything is working great. Thanks for the help KP and Tom. I have a question about the swping script that I'm using for fail-over. It i

Re: [leaf-user] Shorewall and Bering-uClibc 4.0

2011-01-19 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Mittwoch, 19. Januar 2011, um 21:17:05 schrieb marvin horst: > Version 4.4.15 still has the date format with underscores. They shouldn't > cause any problem other than the date output will look odd. So essentially shorewall works? My shorewall looks like: Jan 19 18:41:22 gatekeeper kernel: [ 5

Re: [leaf-user] Shorewall and Bering-uClibc 4.0

2011-01-19 Thread marvin horst
Version 4.4.15 still has the date format with underscores. They shouldn't cause any problem other than the date output will look odd. On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 1:31 PM, KP Kirchdoerfer < kap...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 19. Januar 2011, um 19:07:23 schrieb Tom Eastep: > > On 1/19

Re: [leaf-user] bering uclibc 4.0

2011-01-19 Thread Andrew
19.01.2011 19:10, kenneth joachim llanto пишет: > Hello all, > > Good day! > > I'm quite new in linux and in LEAF. > > What I'm trying to do is install the bering uclibc 4.0 to a > harddisk. And truthfully I'm a little lost.. > > This is what I was able to do as of now.. > -run the iso in a cd rom.

Re: [leaf-user] Shorewall and Bering-uClibc 4.0

2011-01-19 Thread marvin horst
Okay, I'll try the newer version. On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 1:31 PM, KP Kirchdoerfer < kap...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 19. Januar 2011, um 19:07:23 schrieb Tom Eastep: > > On 1/19/11 7:33 AM, marvin horst wrote: > > > I am having some issues with the shorewall module distributed

Re: [leaf-user] Shorewall and Bering-uClibc 4.0

2011-01-19 Thread marvin horst
Here is the output from my trace. It looks like some output to the screen is "leaking" and getting assigned to SW_ETH2_ADDRESS. + date +%b %d %T + timestamp=Jan 12 21:13:11 + echo Jan 12 21:13:11 Processing /etc/shorewall/params ... + g_stopping= + [ -d /var/lib/shorewall ] + [ -n /var/log/shorewa

Re: [leaf-user] Shorewall and Bering-uClibc 4.0

2011-01-19 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Mittwoch, 19. Januar 2011, um 19:07:23 schrieb Tom Eastep: > On 1/19/11 7:33 AM, marvin horst wrote: > > I am having some issues with the shorewall module distributed with Bering > > 4.0. > > > > Shorewall appears to NOT be using the perl version of the firewall by > > default. Where do I chang

Re: [leaf-user] Shorewall and Bering-uClibc 4.0

2011-01-19 Thread Tom Eastep
On 1/19/11 7:33 AM, marvin horst wrote: > I am having some issues with the shorewall module distributed with Bering > 4.0. > > Shorewall appears to NOT be using the perl version of the firewall by > default. Where do I change this? I'm having problems with the shell version. > See below... > > I

[leaf-user] bering uclibc 4.0

2011-01-19 Thread kenneth joachim llanto
Hello all, Good day! I'm quite new in linux and in LEAF. What I'm trying to do is install the bering uclibc 4.0 to a harddisk. And truthfully I'm a little lost.. This is what I was able to do as of now.. -run the iso in a cd rom.. The problem is I don't know how to transfer the files to the HD

Re: [leaf-user] Shorewall and Bering-uClibc 4.0

2011-01-19 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Mittwoch, 19. Januar 2011, um 17:18:03 schrieb marvin horst: > version 4.4.14 This is a shorewall perl version. Tom Eastep wrote in the Release Notes: " a) In shorewall.conf, if you have specified "SHOREWALL_COMPILER=shell" then you must either: - change that specification to

Re: [leaf-user] Shorewall and Bering-uClibc 4.0

2011-01-19 Thread marvin horst
version 4.4.14 On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:09 AM, KP Kirchdoerfer < kap...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 19. Januar 2011, um 16:33:12 schrieb marvin horst: > > I am having some issues with the shorewall module distributed with Bering > > 4.0. > > > > Shorewall appears to NOT be usin

Re: [leaf-user] Shorewall and Bering-uClibc 4.0

2011-01-19 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Mittwoch, 19. Januar 2011, um 16:33:12 schrieb marvin horst: > I am having some issues with the shorewall module distributed with Bering > 4.0. > > Shorewall appears to NOT be using the perl version of the firewall by > default. Where do I change this? I'm having problems with the shell > versi

[leaf-user] Shorewall and Bering-uClibc 4.0

2011-01-19 Thread marvin horst
I am having some issues with the shorewall module distributed with Bering 4.0. Shorewall appears to NOT be using the perl version of the firewall by default. Where do I change this? I'm having problems with the shell version. See below... I had some issues with the shorewall scripts were the date