On Tue 2015-01-13T11:03:35 -0500, Brooks Harris hath writ:
This year's Y2K: 'Leap second' threatens to break the Internet
http://money.cnn.com/2015/01/13/technology/leap-second/index.html
In that article is a link to a recent version of the Draft CPM
document with the options that are being
If I understand the provenance, BIPM is responsible for maintaining atomic
time and TAI, IERS is responsible maintaining for UT1 and Leap Seconds, and
ITU is responsible for time dissemination. Whats not so clear, and it
would be reassuring to know, is how the information is officially
Brooks Harris bro...@edlmax.com wrote:
|This year's Y2K: 'Leap second' threatens to break the Internet
|http://money.cnn.com/2015/01/13/technology/leap-second/index.html
I liked very much that one of the first things Jobs' widow did was
to spend money for high quality journalism.
Oh man, *how*
In message AF8BF6DCD7234A3489E799728A5F4D01@pc52, Tom Van Baak writes:
I'm more of a minimalist. Try this 40-line text file instead:
http://maia.usno.navy.mil/ser7/tai-utc.dat
This simple file has been around since the 90's and is always right.
Ehh
It may be in a purely
On Tue 2015-01-13T07:44:42 -0500, Brooks Harris hath writ:
That's what I meant - there needs to be multiple ways, appropriate
to each architecture or purpose, to obtain the information. So,
that's why I suggested it as an API: a clearly defined set of
metadata that could be implemented in
On Jan 13, 2015, at 6:10 AM, Brooks Harris bro...@edlmax.com wrote:
On 2015-01-12 06:42 PM, Rob Seaman wrote:
On Jan 12, 2015, at 2:53 PM, Martin Burnicki martin.burni...@meinberg.de
wrote:
I've suggested at various occasions that the IERS should be the
authoritative source for a leap
Hi Rob,
On 2015-01-12 06:42 PM, Rob Seaman wrote:
On Jan 12, 2015, at 2:53 PM, Martin Burnicki martin.burni...@meinberg.de
wrote:
I've suggested at various occasions that the IERS should be the authoritative
source for a leap second file.
There were discussions at both the 2013 and 2011
On 2015-01-12 02:03 PM, Tom Van Baak wrote:
If would really be good if there was one authoritative soure for this,
and that there was a uniform format. Ideally there would be multiple
ways to access it, via text and binary for different architectures. The
might be thought of as a UTC Metadata
The ITU-R is what social scientists call a supranational institution. These
are institutions that make recommendations that have a tendency to trump
national sovereignty. The manner in which this trumping of national laws
occurs is that users tend to follow the supranational recommendation
This year's Y2K: 'Leap second' threatens to break the Internet
http://money.cnn.com/2015/01/13/technology/leap-second/index.html
-Brooks
___
LEAPSECS mailing list
LEAPSECS@leapsecond.com
https://pairlist6.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs
On 2015-01-13 01:44 PM, Hal Murray wrote:
If I understand the provenance, BIPM is responsible for maintaining atomic
time and TAI, IERS is responsible maintaining for UT1 and Leap Seconds, and
ITU is responsible for time dissemination. Whats not so clear, and it
would be reassuring to know,
11 matches
Mail list logo
