I've renamed and reorganized the proposed timescales of CCT to reflect
the responses I've gotten and to hopefully make the intentions clear. I
had used the terms proleptic UTC and proleptic TAI and these are now
renamed.
There are other important elements the CCT proposal, including counting
Brooks Harris wrote:
The main objective of the CCT design is to recast TAI and UTC into a
more unified specification appropriate for time-keeping from 1972
onward.
Just so we're clear about scope, your message doesn't actually respecify
TAI and UTC. You've defined your PAT and CCT, for the
On Sun 2014-01-19T23:53:44 +, Zefram hath writ:
I'm not familiar with PTP, but I see a number of documents saying that it
uses an epoch of 1970-01-01 00:00:00 TAI. If so, unlike the NTP origin
this is a perfectly well-defined real instant.
Yes, well-defined, but not defined in a
On 2014-01-19 03:53 PM, Zefram wrote:
Your definitions are generally poor. There is much that you omit or
make horrendously unclear.
There really aren't any definitions yet. Its an informal email. I'd
hoped I could make a little progress without completing the entire
document. Maybe not.
