Re: Leap-seconds, the epsilon perspective

2003-01-29 Thread John Cowan
Mark Calabretta scripsit: > >Mean solar days don't affect me to speak of. > > We're looking for a solution which will satisfy the broadest spectrum > of users with the least inconvenience. I meant "me as random citizen", not "me as me". > >What for? Why should we (the people of the Earth) care

Re: Leap-seconds, the epsilon perspective

2003-01-29 Thread Mark Calabretta
On Tue 2003/01/28 23:10:07 CDT, John Cowan wrote in a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >I at least care that a *civil* day be 86400 SI seconds in length. This begs the question of why you care. >Mean solar days don't affect me to speak of. We're looking for a solution which will satisfy the broade

Re: Leap-seconds, the epsilon perspective

2003-01-29 Thread John Cowan
Steve Allen scripsit: > Which is more important... > for civil time to be counted in SI seconds? > for civil time to track the rotation of earth smoothly? IMHO the former. > Mark's alternative resembles the civil time solution adopted by the > martian colonists in Kim Stanley Rob

Re: Leap-seconds, the epsilon perspective

2003-01-29 Thread Ken Pizzini
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 12:33:48AM -0800, Steve Allen wrote: > > What for? Why should we (the people of the Earth) care about mean > > solar days? For some purposes, apparent solar time is important, but > > most of the time it's civil time that counts. Why should that be tied > > to mean solar

Re: Leap-seconds, the epsilon perspective

2003-01-29 Thread Steve Allen
On Tue 2003-01-28T23:10:07 -0500, John Cowan hath writ: > Dr. Mark Calabretta scripsit: > > > Much of the problem boils down to the question of why we would want > > to continue to pretend that a mean solar day has exactly 86400 SI > > seconds when in fact, it has 86400+epsilon SI seconds. > > I at

Re: Leap-seconds, the epsilon perspective

2003-01-28 Thread John Cowan
Dr. Mark Calabretta scripsit: > Much of the problem boils down to the question of why we would want > to continue to pretend that a mean solar day has exactly 86400 SI > seconds when in fact, it has 86400+epsilon SI seconds. I at least care that a *civil* day be 86400 SI seconds in length. Mean s

Leap-seconds, the epsilon perspective

2003-01-28 Thread Dr. Mark Calabretta
On Mon 2003/01/27 18:21:02 -, Ed Davies wrote in a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Everything would be a lot simpler and more reliable if all systems >could work with a single simple "universal" time scale which: > >1. Has SI length seconds. > >2. Has minutes of 60 seconds, hours of 3'600 secon