Clive D.W. Feather scripsit:
John Cowan said:
Barry gules and argent of seven and six,John Cowan
on a canton azure fifty molets of the second. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--blazoning the U.S. flag http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
You don't get odd numbers of barry. It's
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 08:24:39PM +, Ed Mirmak wrote:
Those who have submitted data, plots, or descriptions of system response to
the leap second addition may want to forward those messages to ITU WP-7A.
Related to the Nov 2005 U.S. proposal to the ITU to redefine UTC and
abandon leap
My VLF/LF capture has started to yield information now.
I captured the antennasignal from my home-brew loop antenna
(http://phk.freebsd.dk/loran-c/Antenna/) with an Adlink 9812
ADC card at 12 bits and 5 million samples per second.
In total I have 400GB of capture, almost 8 seconds around
the
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Rob Seaman writes:
Perhaps what we need is simply to define our terms. A lot of the
friction on LEAPSECS undoubtedly comes from conflicting meanings.
Good point.
Civil Time = the common basis for diverse time usage worldwide
No.
Civil Time is a legal
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
Universal Time = confusing term which comes handy when trying to
manipulate discussions about leap second futures.
I have to take issue with this one. It's obvious from the current definition
and terminology used with Coordinated Universal
On Sat 2006-01-07T00:32:44 +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp hath writ:
TAI
Owned by BIPM / Metre Convention
This is indisputably agreed to be true since the demise of the BIH.
I know of no endorsement for the use of TAI outside of metrological
circumstances.
UTC
