Re: civil time = solar time

2006-01-05 Thread Steve Allen
On Thu 2006-01-05T08:18:11 +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp hath echoed Rob:
 Which is why the longitude conference decided on a 1 hour quantum.

No, they did not.

The delegates gratuitously offered existing schemes (the US railroads
being one touted long and hard by some guy named Allen) along with
proposed schemes (one for Europe had zones on meridians spaced 10
time-minutes apart).

All of those schemes were withdrawn after being entered into the
official record.  The reasoning was that their conference could not
pretend to assert any authority over local civil time in any
jurisdiction.

Only the local civil authorities can decide what passes for local
civil time.  In the US the result of this will be seen this year as
many embedded devices start making daylight time transitions on the
wrong dates.

I remain in awe of McCarthy's indication that predicting leap seconds
might be acceptable over decade timescales.

I remain in dismay that said point is moot for embedded devices, for
the local civil authorities are more whimsical than the earth with
larger amplitude deviations at less predictable intervals.

--
Steve Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED]WGS-84 (GPS)
UCO/Lick ObservatoryNatural Sciences II, Room 165Lat  +36.99858
University of CaliforniaVoice: +1 831 459 3046   Lng -122.06014
Santa Cruz, CA 95064http://www.ucolick.org/~sla/ Hgt +250 m


Re: civil time = solar time

2006-01-05 Thread Ed Davies

Rob Seaman wrote:

I said:


all parties must certainly agree that civil time (as we know it) IS
mean solar time.



Ed says:


saying that it IS civil time is probably a bit strong.



Probably a bit strong is not precisely a staunch denial.


It's not meant to be a staunch denial.  I'm mostly supporting
your argument - just trying to tone down one aspect which I think
is overstated to avoid giving rehetorical ammunition to those
who see things otherwise.

Ed.


Re: civil time = solar time

2006-01-05 Thread Clive D.W. Feather
Rob Seaman said:
 Rather, the often repeated canard that civilians don't give a fig for
 the actual position of the sun in the sky implies that it is
 precisely apparent solar time that only queer ducks like astronomers
 care about.  Mean solar time is what civilians DO care about.

Only *very* *very* approximately.

In the UK, sunset varies from about 15:30 to about 22:30 LCT. Sunrise isn't
an event most people even care about (for me, it shifts from happens at
work to happens before I get up on an annual basis but, during the
winter, on a weekly basis as well).

Provided that astronomical noon is between about 08:00 and 16:00, most
people won't care.

For unless they see the sky,
But they can't, and that is why
They know not if it's dark outside or light.

--
Clive D.W. Feather  | Work:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   | Tel:+44 20 8495 6138
Internet Expert | Home:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  | Fax:+44 870 051 9937
Demon Internet  | WWW: http://www.davros.org | Mobile: +44 7973 377646
Thus plc||


Re: Longer leap second notice

2006-01-05 Thread Clive D.W. Feather
John Cowan said:
 Barry gules and argent of seven and six,John Cowan
 on a canton azure fifty molets of the second.   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 --blazoning the U.S. flag   http://www.ccil.org/~cowan

You don't get odd numbers of barry. It's Gules, six bars argent.

--
Clive D.W. Feather  | Work:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   | Tel:+44 20 8495 6138
Internet Expert | Home:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  | Fax:+44 870 051 9937
Demon Internet  | WWW: http://www.davros.org | Mobile: +44 7973 377646
Thus plc||


Re: civil time = solar time

2006-01-05 Thread William Thompson

Clive D.W. Feather wrote:

Rob Seaman said:


Rather, the often repeated canard that civilians don't give a fig for
the actual position of the sun in the sky implies that it is
precisely apparent solar time that only queer ducks like astronomers
care about.  Mean solar time is what civilians DO care about.



Only *very* *very* approximately.

In the UK, sunset varies from about 15:30 to about 22:30 LCT. Sunrise isn't
an event most people even care about (for me, it shifts from happens at
work to happens before I get up on an annual basis but, during the
winter, on a weekly basis as well).

Provided that astronomical noon is between about 08:00 and 16:00, most
people won't care.


People certainly seem to care in this country (USA).  There's always a lot of
discussion about it when shifting between standard and daylight savings time,
and especially when discussing the date on which that switch should take place.
 The biggest effect that people seem to be worried about is whether the Sun
will be up when children are going to school in the morning.

Similarly, many people with small farms also have other jobs, and have to
complete their chores in the morning before going off to work.  To them it's
very important what time the Sun comes up.  I have this on good authority from
one of my colleagues who is in just this situation.  It's also figured in
discussions about DST in the media.

Finally, there's a very good reason why politicians spend so much time worrying
about DST--there's a distinct impact on the economy, especially in terms of
energy use.

People definitely care about the relationship between civilian time and apparent
solar time.  The amount of fiddling with the dates of DST to get it just right
tells me that people care about apparent solar time to somewhat better than one
hour accuracy.

--
William Thompson
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
Code 612.1
Greenbelt, MD  20771
USA

301-286-2040
[EMAIL PROTECTED]