In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
M. Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: James Maynard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: : M. Warner Losh wrote:
: : In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: : James Maynard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: : :
No. The article specifically says that after it the system time gets
to ,600, it is decremented by one and there is specific code in the
code that returns the system time to applications that makes it stand
still. The second isn't *NOT* repeated. Repeat: The second is *NOT*
repeated in
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tim Shepard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: But there's a difference between NTP timestamps, and the details of
: the implementation of a system which uses NTP for synchronization.
Ah, I was getting the two confused and didn't quite realize it until
your
So internally, once we hit the leap second time, we step backwards.
Lovely waxing crescent moon last night. I could see it out of the
north facing windows of our family room. It might be simpler in some
sense to pretend that the moon (and the sun for that matter) always
rises due east and set
