Re: 24:00 versus 00:00

2006-02-17 Thread Markus Kuhn
"Clive D.W. Feather" wrote on 2006-02-17 05:58 UTC: > However, London Underground does print 24:00 on a ticket issued at > midnight, and in fact continues up to 27:30 (such tickets count as being > issued on the previous day for validity purposes, and this helps to > reinforce it). The tickets of

Re: 24:00 versus 00:00

2006-02-17 Thread Rob Seaman
Clive Feather wrote: London Underground does print 24:00 on a ticket issued at midnight, and in fact continues up to 27:30 An even better example. We cannot expect to dissuade such usage. Deploying systems that require it be avoided is folly. Wouldn't think the modulus operator would be cont

Re: 24:00 versus 00:00

2006-02-17 Thread John Cowan
Clive D.W. Feather scripsit: > However, London Underground does print 24:00 on a ticket issued at > midnight, and in fact continues up to 27:30 (such tickets count as being > issued on the previous day for validity purposes, and this helps to > reinforce it). Airlines in the U.S., where the doubl

Re: 24:00 versus 00:00

2006-02-17 Thread John Cowan
Ed Davies scripsit: > No, it amounts to saying that some days are 24 hours and 1 second > long. When you're half a second from the end of such a day you > are 24 hours, zero minutes and half a second from the start. I grant that. Nonetheless, the third-from-last figure in a broken-out timestamp

Re: 24:00 versus 00:00

2006-02-17 Thread Ed Davies
Ed Davies scripsit: If only the 24:00 for end of day notation wasn't in the way we could look at positive leap seconds as just being the result of deeming certain days to be a second longer than most and just use 24:00:00. We wouldn't have to muck with the lengths of any of the hours or minutes