In the news.google this week is a press release for a clock that
automatically tracks leap seconds. The PR glowingly touts how the
clock traceable to NIST, so it is useful for timekeeping in all sorts
of processes that need ISO 9000 certification.
http://news.thomasnet.com/fullstory/488673
It
Steve Allen wrote:In the news.google this week is a press release for a clock thatautomatically tracks leap seconds.Anybody volunteering to tell these guys that their product is about to be orphaned? Sounds like a lawsuit in the making. Would think the ITU lawyers would be interested in their
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], John Cowan writes:
Rob Seaman scripsit:
Most troubling would be if two moving platforms are depending on GPS
units with differing delays, e.g., two airplanes following neighboring
flight paths. How far does an airplane move in 2 seconds? What is
the minimum
- Original Message -
From: Steve Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LEAPSECS@ROM.USNO.NAVY.MIL
Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 7:27 AM
Subject: [LEAPSECS] PT Barnum was right
(gesnippt)
Finally, I've been spending a lot of time in the LA region lately.
The CBS radio affiliate in the SF Bay area
On Jul 6, 2006, at 12:46 PM, Brian Garrett wrote:
I was told that the station delays their broadcast in order to
enable on-the-spot editing of objectionable material.
Surely the requirement is to permit review of *potentially*
objectionable material. A time signal is no such thing and need
