Re: [LEAPSECS] Never mind DUT1, what happened to dX ?

2022-03-06 Thread Steve Allen
On Mon 2022-03-07T06:57:02+ Poul-Henning Kamp hath writ: > I'm not talking about the two spikes, I'm talking about the oscillation > disappearing, > and that seems to be in all the data sources ? ah, yes. I think we need another nutation cycle worth of high precision data, but I suspect

[LEAPSECS] problems with early TAI

2022-03-06 Thread Steve Allen
Becker had a lot of opinions about atomic time, and he laid out the pictures of just how bad things were. Note figures 4 and 5 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/phbl.19830390302 Those show how the rate of TA(BIH) was way off as of the 1969 rearrangement that did not attempt to

Re: [LEAPSECS] Never mind DUT1, what happened to dX ?

2022-03-06 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
Steve Allen writes: > On Mon 2022-03-07T06:33:31+ Poul-Henning Kamp hath writ: > > I looked at the Bulletin A plots this morning to see how DUT1 is > > developing, but then I noticed the 'dX' term plot: > > > > > >

Re: [LEAPSECS] Never mind DUT1, what happened to dX ?

2022-03-06 Thread Steve Allen
On Mon 2022-03-07T06:33:31+ Poul-Henning Kamp hath writ: > I looked at the Bulletin A plots this morning to see how DUT1 is > developing, but then I noticed the 'dX' term plot: > > > https://datacenter.iers.org/singlePlot.php?plotname=BulletinA_All-DX=6 > > What happened in late 2019 ?

[LEAPSECS] Never mind DUT1, what happened to dX ?

2022-03-06 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
I looked at the Bulletin A plots this morning to see how DUT1 is developing, but then I noticed the 'dX' term plot: https://datacenter.iers.org/singlePlot.php?plotname=BulletinA_All-DX=6 What happened in late 2019 ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20