Re: Unifying Atomic Time and the post-Gregorian calendar corrections

2003-07-03 Thread Steve Allen
On Thu 2003-07-03T18:30:00 +0100, Markus Kuhn hath writ: Thanks for pointing this out! Weekday-continuity is indeed a bit of a problem of this approach. I can't see any other practical solution than skipping one weekday together with the skipped 29 February 5600, in other words, 5600-03-01

Re: making leap hours workable

2003-07-03 Thread Seeds, Glen
Title: RE: [LEAPSECS] making leap hours workable I believe you would get very strong pushback from the POSIX world if you tried to make the time base TAI rather than UTC. Without a strong case for this change (which I haven't seen yet), I would be one of them. /glen -Original

Re: making leap hours workable

2003-07-03 Thread Seeds, Glen
Title: RE: [LEAPSECS] making leap hours workable -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: July 2, 2003 4:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [LEAPSECS] making leap hours workable The second reality is that many existing applications