Re: Problems with GLONASS Raw Receiver Data at Start of New Year

2006-01-17 Thread Steve Allen
On Tue 2006-01-17T18:26:49 +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp hath writ: As far as I recall GLONASS was messed up for hours on the previous leapsecond, so there is a good chance it is because of the leap seconds that it fell out this time. Not according to the Russians:

Re: Monsters from the id

2006-01-17 Thread Mark Calabretta
On Mon 2006/01/16 00:40:28 CDT, John Cowan wrote in a message to: LEAPSECS@ROM.USNO.NAVY.MIL I realize the ALHP has severe problems with this, but I don't approve of the ALHP anyhow (save perhaps tactically, as explained). Agreement! But does anyone think that the leap hour proposal is anything

Re: Monsters from the id

2006-01-17 Thread Neal McBurnett
On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 02:09:20AM -0700, Rob Seaman wrote: On Jan 13, 2006, at 12:46 AM, John Cowan wrote: In the end, it will be impossible to maintain the notion that a solar day is 24h of 60m of 60s each: we wind up, IIRC, with the solar day and lunar month both at about