Re: what time is it, legally?

2006-12-12 Thread Magnus Danielson
From: Steve Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [LEAPSECS] what time is it, legally? Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:45:58 -0800 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This history is apparently not lost to folks at NIST, for the US senate continues to consider legislation which would explicitly rewrite US

Re: what time is it, legally?

2006-12-13 Thread Magnus Danielson
From: Peter Bunclark [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [LEAPSECS] what time is it, legally? Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 10:05:00 + Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rob, On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Ed Davies wrote: Rob Seaman wrote: I'm given to wonder how much of the friction on this mailing list is

Re: Introduction of long term scheduling

2007-01-01 Thread Magnus Danielson
From: Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term scheduling Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 19:29:19 + Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Poul-Henning, In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Steve Allen writes: McCarthy pretty much answered this question in 2001 as I

Re: A lurker surfaces

2007-01-01 Thread Magnus Danielson
From: Michael Sokolov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [LEAPSECS] A lurker surfaces Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 22:22:23 GMT Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ashley Yakeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd like to see an elastic civil second to which SI nanoseconds are added or removed. Ditto! I have

Re: A lurker surfaces

2007-01-02 Thread Magnus Danielson
From: Ashley Yakeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [LEAPSECS] A lurker surfaces Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 15:21:14 -0800 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ashley, Magnus Danielson wrote: The detailed introduction of the frequency corrections in various sources was different, and getting

Re: A lurker surfaces

2007-01-02 Thread Magnus Danielson
From: Ashley Yakeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [LEAPSECS] A lurker surfaces Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 16:40:23 -0800 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ashley, Magnus Danielson wrote: The budget isn't there and the govrements already pay good money for the systems in place and is looking

Re: A lurker surfaces

2007-01-02 Thread Magnus Danielson
From: Rob Seaman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [LEAPSECS] A lurker surfaces Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 20:45:14 -0700 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rob, Magnus Danielson wrote: If you do want a new timescale, I think rubber seconds isn't going to be the solution. One might point out

Re: A lurker surfaces

2007-01-02 Thread Magnus Danielson
From: Steve Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [LEAPSECS] A lurker surfaces Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 21:35:24 -0800 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Tue 2007-01-02T22:16:19 -0700, M. Warner Losh hath writ: changed in later revisions to be the same as GPS time. There's an extreme reluctance

Re: Introduction of long term scheduling

2007-01-03 Thread Magnus Danielson
From: Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term scheduling Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 11:45:52 + Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Peter Bunclark writes: Without the Moon, the Earth could nod through large angles, lying on

Re: Introduction of long term scheduling

2007-01-03 Thread Magnus Danielson
From: Tony Finch [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term scheduling Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 17:38:35 + Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Wed, 3 Jan 2007, Magnus Danielson wrote: Assuming you have corrected for another gravitational field, yes. The current SI