In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Markus Kuhn writes:
The crudest approach would probably be
I would be all for it :-)
a) N+S America: use local time of Cuba (~ UT =
- 5.5 h)
Unless you substitute something other than Cuba, your proposal will
never get one inch of
On Dec 18, 2005, at 3:58 PM, Markus Kuhn wrote:
Why is it important that our clocks give a +/- 30 minutes
approximation of local astronomical time?
Unimportant for some purposes. Important for others. Who ranks the
relative merit?
The key issue is surely a question of interoperability. As
Poul-Henning Kamp said:
Not strictly on topic but probably of interest - a Bill in the UK House of
Lords which I just came across when looking for something else:
A Bill To
Advance time by one hour throughout the year for an experimental period;
and for connected purposes.
the entire
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote on 2005-12-16 22:44 UTC:
Now that EU got extended way east I think everybody expected the
silly notion of one timezone for all of EU to die a rapid death
but that might just wishfull thinking.
Mankind could go even further, abandon the entire notion of time zones
being
Not strictly on topic but probably of interest - a Bill in the UK House of
Lords which I just came across when looking for something else:
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200506/ldbills/048/06048.1-i.html
A Bill To
Advance time by one hour throughout the year for an experimental
