In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ed Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: Earlier, I wrote:
: We all know that it (and any other world-wide timescale) is
: postal at the level of the time it takes light to cross a
: moderately small room but for microsecond precision and looser
: this is
On Sun, 22 Jan 2006, M. Warner Losh wrote:
The short answer is that you cannot get a time feed of TAI, so the
So isn't this one of the things we want to fix in the brave new world of
joined-up timekeeping? Distribute (very close to) TAI, keep the kernel
PLLs sweet, move leap second handling to
Mr. Losh and I have apologized to each other, off list. I think we
should now retire the cruel fraud subject line.
--
James Maynard
Salem, Oregon, USA
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peter Bunclark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: On Sun, 22 Jan 2006, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: The short answer is that you cannot get a time feed of TAI, so the
:
: So isn't this one of the things we want to fix in the brave new world of
: joined-up
