On 2 August 2017 at 06:36, John Crispin wrote:
> On 31/07/17 18:11, John Crispin wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I rebased my ages old kernel patch cleanup series. It can be found here
>> [1].
>>
>> the series annotates all patches and splits them up into 3 folders
>> backports/pending/hacks.
>>
>> I'd lik
On 31/07/17 18:11, John Crispin wrote:
Hi,
I rebased my ages old kernel patch cleanup series. It can be found
here [1].
the series annotates all patches and splits them up into 3 folders
backports/pending/hacks.
I'd like to push this asap if there are no mayor issues as it will be
a pai
On 01/08/17 21:37, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
From: Rafał Miłecki
Detecting UBI superblock may be useful for tools wanting to simplify or
automate attaching UBI. Please note it's not directly related to the
ubifs support which is just a filesystem working on top of UBI volume.
This patch adds simp
On 08/01/2017 02:00 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> Packages are allowed to specify dependency configs in their
> PKG_CONFIG_DEPENDS. Any value change for any dependency should result
> in rebuilding the package.
>
> This feature is handled with STAMP_CONFIGURED in package.mk. For every
> package we ha
Packages are allowed to specify dependency configs in their
PKG_CONFIG_DEPENDS. Any value change for any dependency should result
in rebuilding the package.
This feature is handled with STAMP_CONFIGURED in package.mk. For every
package we have something like:
build_dir/target-*/fstools-*/.configur
From: Rafał Miłecki
Detecting UBI superblock may be useful for tools wanting to simplify or
automate attaching UBI. Please note it's not directly related to the
ubifs support which is just a filesystem working on top of UBI volume.
This patch adds simple code reading UBI version and unique numbe
I would recommend two options and break this into two steps or concepts.
(1) A new option removes default servers. This option is independent of
option 2. For implementation, an inline awk script might have more
robust syntax then sed. (2) Current list server option adds servers to
the list. E
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 4:58 PM, Val Kulkov wrote:
> I am requesting feedback on how to make LEDE/OpenWrt a little more
> friendly to end users where an outdated version of opkg cannot install
> a package properly. A few possible approaches I can think of are:
Some approaches I've seen around thi
