Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 1/4] kernel: add missing config symbols

On 02/01/2018 11:35 PM, Tim Harvey wrote: > Signed-off-by: Tim Harvey > --- > target/linux/generic/config-4.14 | 9 - > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/target/linux/generic/config-4.14 > b/target/linux/generic/config-4.14 > index

[LEDE-DEV] tools/mkimage: copy mkenvimage to bin directory

For some boards u-boot binary environment file is required, which is generated by mkenvimage utility. But in OpenWrt there is no separate support for mkenvimage, which is a part of u-boot tools. mkenvimage gets built in u-boot/tools as well as mkimage anyways. So lets just copy mkenvimage to

[LEDE-DEV] pistachio target

Hi, the imgtecs pistachio target is apparently EOL'ed and there is no support for it anymore. imgtec promised to maintain the target inside our tree but with their current situation don't appear to be able to do so in future. I'd like to drop the target ASAP.     John

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 2/4] imx6: add support for Linux 4.14

On 2018-02-01 23:35, Tim Harvey wrote: diff --git a/target/linux/imx6/patches-4.14/300-fix-enumeration.patch b/target/linux/imx6/patches-4.14/300-fix-enumeration.patch new file mode 100644 index 000..ce9e815 --- /dev/null +++ b/target/linux/imx6/patches-4.14/300-fix-enumeration.patch @@

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 1/4] kernel: add missing config symbols

On 2018-02-01 23:35, Tim Harvey wrote: Signed-off-by: Tim Harvey --- target/linux/generic/config-4.14 | 9 - 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/target/linux/generic/config-4.14 b/target/linux/generic/config-4.14 index fa389bf..89f2f43

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH mountd 2/2] mount: drop duplicated rmdir() call from the mount_enum_drives()

From: Rafał Miłecki Call to rmdir() for the same path is already executed in the mount_dev_del(). Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki --- mount.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/mount.c b/mount.c index aa346ff..bf5fbfd 100644

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH mountd 1/2] mount: drop duplicated unlink() call from the mount_dev_del()

From: Rafał Miłecki There is no need to call unlink() there as mount_enum_drives() does it too, soon after calling mount_dev_del(). Also mount_enum_drives() does that for STATUS_EXPIRED - which is expected - as there is no unlink() call when device expires. Signed-off-by: