schedule.
-Alberto
On 05/05/2018 21:12, Fernando Frediani wrote:
I didn't mention forcing people at any point. Just having someone to
be in charge in order to organize certain things, get people's
availability and make more thing happen.
With regards schedule the lack of one seems not doing
/05/2018 20:41, Fernando Frediani wrote:
One characteristic from OpenWrt, different from other projects is the
lack of a leader or a person who can gather others together, make
some decisions or push for them to happen. If one doesn't like this
title it can also be "Project Manager" o
One characteristic from OpenWrt, different from other projects is the
lack of a leader or a person who can gather others together, make some
decisions or push for them to happen. If one doesn't like this title it
can also be "Project Manager" or "Project Coordinator". This, in my
view, makes a
Great achievement. Congratulations to all involved.
On the naming topic have in mind the weight OpenWRT has given its
history in all these years. I personally think this point is the
easiest.
Given the agreements continue hopefully there will be a single one
great project again soon with all
That's why I am an adept of hierarchy or at least have well defined
who is responsible for what, otherwise when something is sent to all
nobody will care much to respond unless that affects him/her directly
in some way.
I'm not talking about someone giving orders and others following it,
but just
A while ago in the begining of the project, put my time and myself to
be one of the responsible to set it up, give it LEDE's face, and start
transfering content from OpenWrt but unfortunatelly almost nobody
bored much at the time. It seemed that if you are not a "known person"
you might not get
This is a fantastic thing in OpenWrt and very helpful and I think
should be ported to LEDEas is. And I made myself available to help
with this once a Wiki is defined. However, if I understood correctlly,
someone pointed that "we" don't want specific device page which is
strange in my point of
Has anyone got this message at all ? Or it seems this topic isn't that
important or necessary.
Who is the person in charge of the infrastructure stuff for the project ?
Fernando
On 6 May 2016 at 00:25, Fernando Frediani <fhfredi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So is this on the list to be done
