On 29 May 2017 at 13:45, Imre Kaloz wrote:
> On 2017-05-29 13:10, Jamie Stuart wrote:
>>
>> See another iteration, with:
>>
>> - correct capitalisation
>> - antenna to the side (will not work with lowercase ’n’)
>> - open sans typeface (open source)
>> - mockups of website
I understand that and I had no intention to restart such discussion.
I'm sorry if what I wrote was misinterpreted as such. I didn't mean to.
On 5 June 2017 at 02:08, David Lang wrote:
> the vote on the name was held several months ago, please stop trying to
> re-do the vote just
the vote on the name was held several months ago, please stop trying to re-do
the vote just because it didn't come out the way you wanted it to.
k
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
Julian, thank you for the correction. I truly thought that WRT was
from Wireless Router. I stand corrected :)
Bill, I understand that it would be a risk to change the name. I don't
mind that the project continues to use the OpenWRT brand. I just was
pointing out that it doesn't truly reflects
Can we add “Powered by LEDE” in little tiny letters underneath? ;-)
> On May 29, 2017, at 4:11 AM, Jamie Stuart wrote:
>
> Hi,
> First of all, I’m glad to hear the process of remerging LEDE with OpenWrt is
> moving forward.
> For what it’s worth, if prefer the LEDE name
Carlos-
I don't think it matters what it's called to the OpenWrt/LEDE community
- we have exhibited, shall we say, remarkable flexibility in the last
few years, I think... ;-)
And, in fairness, I don't disagree with you - I think OpenWrt is a
terrible name, one we would never choose if we
Hi Carlos,
the Wrt in OpenWrt comes from the Linksys WRT54G(L) which was the first
supported device. WRT devices from Linkys still exist however they aren't
that relevant anymore.
Maybe we can find a good backronym for Wrt/WRT which describes the current
state of the project better. My first
@Mirko and @Bill
I had the same thoughts in the past. OpenWRt has evolved into a much
more diverse and generic embedded development environment.
It no longer serves only the Wireless community interests or used just
in Wireless Routers. It goes much beyond that.
Also, in my opinion, LEDE would
On 5/30/2017 12:15 PM, Mirko Vogt wrote:
Huhu,
looks great to me and it's definitely the right timing for a logo change :)
Me who came to OpenWrt for porting it to a mobile phone and continued
with pictures frames, mini-notebooks and landline phones, I never
considered OpenWrt as a plain wifi
Huhu,
looks great to me and it's definitely the right timing for a logo change :)
Me who came to OpenWrt for porting it to a mobile phone and continued
with pictures frames, mini-notebooks and landline phones, I never
considered OpenWrt as a plain wifi router distribution/toolchain but one
for
Jamie-
As, perhaps, the only (or at least one of the few) "marketing guys" on
this list, I want to agree with Adrian - this is great. I think it
conveys a very good, clean image.
There was a suggestion of building a "standard, corporate" color scheme
to go with it and make sure we have that
Keeping the name after remerge but with a new logo, helps convey the notion
that there has been a change.
An modernizing the look is great
+1
> El 29/05/2017, a las 12:32, Jamie Stuart escribió:
>
> Tried that Moritz - it just wouldn’t work unfortunately. Neither does
On 05/29/2017 07:45 AM, Imre Kaloz wrote:
> On 2017-05-29 13:10, Jamie Stuart wrote:
>> See another iteration, with:
>>
>> - correct capitalisation
>> - antenna to the side (will not work with lowercase ’n’)
>> - open sans typeface (open source)
>> - mockups of website header
>> - accent colours
On 29/05/17 19:31, Jamie Stuart wrote:
Tried that Moritz - it just wouldn’t work unfortunately. Neither does adding
the antenna afterwards
All - see another set of designs. I’ve opted for Roboto Condensed as the logo
typeface.
Personal favorite is the green as OpenWrt is targeted towards
Tried that Moritz - it just wouldn’t work unfortunately. Neither does adding
the antenna afterwards
All - see another set of designs. I’ve opted for Roboto Condensed as the logo
typeface.
Personal favorite is the green as OpenWrt is targeted towards low-power devices.
http://imgur.com/a/TfWxr
Looks nice.
random idea, merge antenna with O of OpenWrt?
On 05/29/2017 01:10 PM, Jamie Stuart wrote:
See another iteration, with:
- correct capitalisation
- antenna to the side (will not work with lowercase ’n’)
- open sans typeface (open source)
- mockups of website header
- accent colours
On 2017-05-29 13:10, Jamie Stuart wrote:
See another iteration, with:
- correct capitalisation
- antenna to the side (will not work with lowercase ’n’)
- open sans typeface (open source)
- mockups of website header
- accent colours
http://i.imgur.com/ZKtcFXo.png
Nice :) Personally I like the
See another iteration, with:
- correct capitalisation
- antenna to the side (will not work with lowercase ’n’)
- open sans typeface (open source)
- mockups of website header
- accent colours
http://i.imgur.com/ZKtcFXo.png
> On 29 May 2017, at 13:52, John Crispin wrote:
>
>
On 29/05/17 12:11, Jamie Stuart wrote:
Hi,
First of all, I’m glad to hear the process of remerging LEDE with OpenWrt is
moving forward.
For what it’s worth, if prefer the LEDE name (it’s friendlier - ‘leddy’ - and
not tied to the name of an old router!)
However, it seems the consensus is
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 12:11 PM, Jamie Stuart wrote:
> Hi,
> First of all, I’m glad to hear the process of remerging LEDE with OpenWrt is
> moving forward.
> For what it’s worth, if prefer the LEDE name (it’s friendlier - ‘leddy’ - and
> not tied to the name of an old
Hi,
First of all, I’m glad to hear the process of remerging LEDE with OpenWrt is
moving forward.
For what it’s worth, if prefer the LEDE name (it’s friendlier - ‘leddy’ - and
not tied to the name of an old router!)
However, it seems the consensus is that the OpenWrt name should remain. I
21 matches
Mail list logo